• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Disgruntled caravan owners demand alternative site

Baħar iċ-Ċagħaq: The picture says a thousand words. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi

Caravan owners who were ordered to leave Baħar iċ-Ċagħaq by today are signing a petition requesting the authorities to provide them with an alternative site.

The decision to sign the petition was taken yesterday evening during a meeting called on site by the Safari Camping Club after the Government Property Division (GPD) served over 100 caravan owners with a notice giving them 48 hours to remove their mobile homes from Baħar iċ-Ċagħaq.

The GPD told the caravan owners they are not entitled to stay on the land they were occupying as it is not designated as a caravan site and they do not hold the necessary permits.

Safari Club secretary Athilio Montebello said the caravan owners were disappointed at the manner in which they had been slapped with the notices and given such a short deadline to leave.

The club frequently corresponded with the authorities so it was disappointing that there had been no advance warning about the action that came "like a bolt out of the blue".

The club will be meeting the Parliamentary Secretary for Lands, Jason Azzopardi this month, he said, adding that yesterday the club sent an email to the Prime Minister asking him to clarify the situation and explain why the decision had been so sudden.

Mr Montebello explained that caravan owners had been going to the area in question for the past 20 years or so. Previous governments had started processes to convert the area into an official caravan site but plans were not finalised.

Mr Montebello said that according to the club statute, its members were to have mobile caravans equipped with the necessary facilities. Unfortunately, he agreed, there had been a lot of abuse in the Baħar iċ-Ċagħaq area, with people building permanent structures such as rubble walls and tiling the areas in front of their caravan. This cast a bad light on all campers, Mr Montebello said, condemning such illegal actions and adding that the club could not control such abuses as it had no authority to do so.

As the caravan owners gathered for the meeting many voiced their anger at the sudden enforcement action. Some pointed out the electricity sub station and toilets and showers built by the government for the campers adding that this could not lead them to suspect they were there illegally.

Clearly upset by the notices, attached on each caravan, owners stressed that this was their only pastime. One woman, a pensioner, said she did not afford renting an apartment in summer and her caravan was her only source of recreation.

A spokesman for the GPD insisted that the area is not a caravan site, adding that a stop and enforcement notice had already been issued by the planning authority as none of the structures on the site has the required permits.

"With this enforcement notice, the government is giving back to the public yet another area. It is the government's policy to render back to the public what is theirs by right," the spokesman said.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Angelica Attard-Bossert (on 5/10/08)
Brian Calleja: Visitors to the area use "Your" toilet facilities??? As a child growing up in Sliema, my folks owned a cottage at Bahar-ic-Caghaq. All of us neighbourhood kids used to have a ball swimming at the White Rocks. On my last visit to the area I was aghast at the sight of the developing shanty town. Look buddy, you and your club of squatters, stop "hiding behind your finger". Even if some "authority" may have implied tacit approval, that was then, but NOW IS NOW. So just get out.
Charles Micallef (on 2/10/08)
@Brian Calleja,

I do not think that anyone who contributed to these comments is against you or any other Caravan Club having an 'orderely' seasonal summer site to enjoy your pastime / holidays or whatever.

However as you admit the site was abused as can easily be seen by the photograph published on The Times and the area had been turned into a shanty town as there is no other word to decribe it.

You say that your association is a responsible one, why then did you not report the abuse of to the authorities as a bona fide association would have done !

Now you are paying the price, for outstaying your welcome from a couple of months to all year round, and as an association you did not stand up to those who raped and abused the site !!!

You were a golden opportunity to practice your hobby on a very beautiful site, however the site was abused big time as have been other sites in the north of the Island, and the Government is right to call it a day!
Brian Calleja (on 1/10/08)
We wish to inform members of the public who are corresponding about this subject that there are several misconceptions and which we would like to clarify. Below is a list of clarifications.

At the Bahar ic-Caghaq Caravan Site there was no power and water supply at the individual caravans but at the centralised public toilets and showers. Members of the general public who were having a barbeque on the beach also benefitted from our toilet facilities.They also benefitted from the skips which we commission for our rubbish disposal. We transported our water from home or commissioned a water supplier to replenish our water tanks. As regards to electricity supply we used either photovoltiac panels or small generating sets.

There were several comments about us not paying any rent for the land that we occupied for several years. It was no fault of us but the fault of past authorities who could have easily imposed an annual fee from our members
Brian Calleja (on 1/10/08)
. The government authorities could easily have contacted our club's committee to demand payment since we regularly correspond with them. They are in possession of our club's particulars through our letterheads or through the Police from whom we were granted a Club's permit and which is renewed annaually. We definately are not faceless squatters or gypsies as some correspondents are labelling us. Even the Naxxar Local Council with whome we met on occasions and with whome we have a good working relationship are aware of our identity. It is also worthewhile to mention that on past occasions we tried to obtain a title over the land in question. We wrote to the highest Government Authorities and asked them to lease the land for a number of years. We only received acknowledgements to our letters but no definate reply regarding the matter, but now strangely enough the present Government Authorities opted to expose us to redicule by misinformed members of the general public who are making sweeping statements and bunching together good intentioned persons and evil squatters.
Brian Calleja (on 1/10/08)

As a responsible authority our Club regularly applied, on an annual basis, for a permit to use the Bahar ic-Caghaq site two months before the summer camping season starts in May. We used to apply for a permit to camp from the beginning of May up to mid September. Generally the Lands Department used to issue a permit with the imposition of certain conditions such as keeping the area clean and accessible to the public. On occasions we only received an acknowledgement to our application but we never received a no as an answer. Up to 5 years ago all our members used to comply with the permit conditions, such as removing the caravan by mid September but only recently did the habit of leaving the caravan all year round become so widespread. The Authorities could have easily issued a warning to our Club's Committee to stop the practice, but no one intervened.
Adrian Allain (on 1/10/08)
This is how shanty towns begin.
Do you want one in Malta?
anna ellul (on 1/10/08)
@Brian Calleja
you are squatters whether you like it or not. You don't own the land. You never paid for it. It is simply not for sale. And if any politician gave in to your demands, demands which you had no right to make, they were wrong to do so. Thank G-d such wrongs are now being made right. That land belongs to the public and by what stretch of the imagination do you think you should have a right to use it to the detriment of the rest of us. Enough already. If anything you should all be given a very very large bill for all the time you have occupied land and for any damage caused. So just go away and thank your lucky stars for having got away with so much for so long.
joe morana (on 1/10/08)


Squatters at Bahar ic- Caghaq, Armier and other localities know very well that they do not posses any legal tiltle to occupy public land ,much less to build illegaly on it. That is why this public outrage against their abusive actions. PS Jason Azzopardi in a TV news interview rightly dismissed past malpractices by successive political adminsitrations and public entities stating that such malpractices do not give sqautters any rights beyond the rule of law. It is so simple
Charles Micallef (on 1/10/08)
The plot thickens.............................and The Nation keeps wondering

I hate to get involved in politics, BUT we now know that Hon Jason Azzopardi (PN) can speak with the ex Hon Michael Falzon (PN) and they can then consult the ex Hon Michael Refalo (PN) and between them they can come to a conclusion as to why they are now not just evicting the caravans, but also the shacks, including the one's who have been put up for sale!,

We also wonder who sanctioned the Electricity?
Olina Tretyak (on 1/10/08)
@Charles Micallef

:-)))) Let us give it some time and read the amazing news :-))))


@Brian Calleja

Tell us more!
Did you pay for water and electricity used, or it was considered to be used by public in public place?

When Dr.Michael Falzon officially opened the caravan site with one sample, was that sample similar to those on the picture we are looking at?
Charles Micallef (on 1/10/08)
@Olinia Tretyak

I can think of at least one politician who we can ask if this site is being cleared to be turned into a Disco!
Brian Calleja (on 1/10/08)
we want to make it clear that we are not squatters as the government brought us here from qalit marku when it prepered the site with toilets, showers,(fossa) and a substation. Around 1990 minister micheal falzon (pn goverment) came and officially opened with one sampel of how the next part of the project is going to continue and we have been waiting since then for the project to continue. the project was coodinated betwen the minister of tourism Dr. michael refalo and the ministry of micheal falzon and also when the labor party was elected it also did his part by doing the tarmac in the main road of the caravan site. If you think we are squtters whats the use of building twelve showers and twelve toilets in the middle of nowhere with two attendants during the summer period.
I also would like to say that for all the words i said we have all the documents and photos needed to prove who is lying.

Charles Micallef (on 1/10/08)
@Joe Morana,

I appreciate that at law, providing a water and electricity supply does not translate into title of the site, on the other hand if we knew that these caravans / shacks are sited illegally, how do you then explain that a Government Department (the administrators who we elect to administer the affairs of the country wihout fear or favour) assisted these supposedly mobile caravan owners to obtain utilities? by doing so, is one not condoning their actions?

Allow me to be a bit blunt, somewhere along the line, be it a politician, party activist or someone at Enemalta has assisted / sanctioned utlities on an illegal site.

If you have ever had to go through the application process to apply for W & E services for a residence where you even have to provide site photogragphs aswell as a host of other legal documentation to prove that the site is legal, therefore it does not take a genuis to realise that the site is illegal!

So why sanction it?
Olina Tretyak (on 1/10/08)
@Anthony Miggiani

Let her write a book "How to cheat Government for 20 years".
With such bestseller she will afford to rent a summer apartment for recreation.
Olina Tretyak (on 1/10/08)
@Charles Micallef
Agreed. The Enemalta explanations are required. If no person of caravans paid those electricity and water bills, this means that TAXPAYERS were paying them. In such case I would strongly suggest that costs of electricity and water, used since such service was provided, would be collected from the occupants and returned to the government to be used where our taxes were supposed to be used. It is not only question WHO SIGNED the petition to provide water and electricity, it is more question of WHO PAID for all this during the years.

@All
It is a pleasant thought that our Government would decide to clear the coastline to build the decent caravan parking for really mobile caravans for short term stay. But...while the ideal picture of it is pleasing my fantasy, some experience is telling me that clearing the coastline at one forceful move could have been dictated by some permit for building 'whatever' has been recently issued by MEPA on the place of those caravans...Anyone heard about? New disco? Hotel? Golf Pool? Block of apartments?
Anthony Miggiani (on 1/10/08)


Who are these SQUATTERS? Are they Gypsies? What a disgrace for Malta to allow such lawless squatters, gypsies or not, to just simply claim a plot and build a shelter on it on prime vacation land!!! Watch the illegals creating their own ghetto-by-the Mediterranean, complete with their own flag! See what happened in Italy? Wake up Malta. Save the Islands from becoming a third world ghetto! What? She can't afford "to rent a summer apartment"? - UNBELIEVABLE!
joe morana (on 1/10/08)
The supply of electricity and water by itself does not translate into tiltle of property or lease to anyone . Nor does the supply of these services legalise illegal buildings on public and private property. Is this too difficult to understand?
Charles Camilleri (on 1/10/08)
They occupy illegally public property and they have the cheek to demand alternative accommodation to move. Is there a limit to their arrogance? .
Noel Enriquez (on 1/10/08)
"One woman, a pensioner, said she did not afford renting an apartment in summer and her caravan was her only source of recreation."

I also do not afford to buy a Lamborghini, but that does not give me the right to steal one either, even were it be my only recreation!!! Stay at home, and next time you want to go to the sea catch a bus!
Noel Enriquez (on 1/10/08)
Kick them out, they have no right to demand anything! If the government decides to make a caravan site, it should be made through alotted spaces rented out so that everyone gets a chance to go there. If I had a caravan and went to Bahar ic-caghaq, picked a spot of my pleasing with tiles and concrete a disgruntled person who occupied that spot for years on end would definately lock horns with me. So if it's public land eradicate all forms of abuse being committed on it. And with 'all' I also refer to Armier rooms, Ghajn Tuffieha Barracks and other areas littering our coastline.
Charles Micallef (on 1/10/08)
When we apply for water and electricity meters, one have to fill in various forms which will carry the authorisation signatures, and although I appreciate that this has been a number of years since, one would expect that these will be sitting in Enemalta Arhcives.

I do not think that it will be so difficult for Hon Austin Gatt the Minister responsible for Enemalta to try and find out why and who by these installations have been authorised by !

I bet that those files will tell a story,

I also realise that someone who was in very senior position at the time, would have been an accomplice in this babuljata!

Let us now hope that Enemalta archives are very well secure..............and fire resistant.
l Galea (on 1/10/08)
@Wilfred L Camilleri
And who was in government for the last 20 years except for a short 22-month period?
Wilfred L Camilleri (on 1/10/08)
These caravan owners and their club have absolutely no right to demand anything. I have no issue with them lobbying the government for more controlled and fee-for-service caravan and camping sites. However, they must first vacate the site and restore it to its natural state. Mr Montebello's admission that they have been abusing public property for 20 years says it all. Mr. Montebello also referred to "a lot of abuse in the Baħar iċ-Ċagħaq area" with the building of walls and other permanent features. It's typical of squatters to do this and then claim that they have the right to continue on forever and treat the land as their own.

The government should clear these squatters out and take them to court to recoup the cost of cleaning up the area and restoring it to its natural state!
Anna Ellul (on 1/10/08)
Fantastic news!!! Finally a government that has found its spine!!! I too cannot afford a summer house so I just go to the beach for the day towel in hand. Please Jason and dear PM do not give into their demands. People like them are the scourge of this nation. If anything they should be made aware that they are fortunate that they are not going to be penalised. That should be the extent of any negotiations with them. That they have gotten away for it so long doesn't mean that they have the right to do so. The downright cheek of these people! If a caravan site is going to be set up, then all should have the opportunity to apply for a spot and it should be in a place which (i) is not an eyesore (ii) is of no inconvenience to the public at large and (iii) is at a real cost to the users. Again prosit prosit great move and I hope that the Govt will have the courage to do this with all the illegal squatters across the country - Armier, mellieha, the various beaches around Malta and Gozo -
Olina Tretyak (on 1/10/08)
@Michelle Caruana

Electricity/showers/toilets/drains were built by authorities not for those few people who occupied that public land for ages, but for all of us who should have come there camping for a day or a week.

Opinion of those occupants that electricity and showers were provided solely for them is highly mistaken...unless...they were receiving electricity and water bills. Were they?
R. Camilleri (on 1/10/08)
The picture looks likes some slum area in Naples !
Mark Fenech (on 1/10/08)
They should consider themselves lucky that the government moved at the end of summer rather than at the beginning,
J.Micallef (on 1/10/08)
Clear the whole place and don't forget the "Splash and Fun". The whole area must be left clear to be enjoyed by the public.
Joanne Micallef (on 1/10/08)
Just as the authorities made headlines reclaiming public land in certain localities by confiscating any abusive tables and chairs, likewise these squatters must be cleared. Unfortunately the Goverment has created a very dangerous precedent by accommodating the Armier boat houses.


Charles Sammut (on 1/10/08)
These squatters have absolutely no right to be there and should be removed as soon as possible.

But the authorities have been grossly negligent and incompetent to have allowed this eyesore to fester for 20 or so years. It was not as if they were not in full public view.

One wonders how MEPA spends so much money on "ensuring" compliance, even utilising aerial photography and yet it is only now that these illegal structures are discovered.

But, you have to give it to these caravan owners. Justifying themselves because it is their only form of recreation. The fact that it also happens to be against the law does not dawn on them.

Can you imagine that sort of defence in court? "But your honour, shooting heroin is my only form of recreation." Or "Touching up little children is my only form of recreation." No, I don't think it will stand the test.
A. CAruana (on 1/10/08)
Re The picture a thousand words indeed. I 'd say a million words. Where are the caravans ?
What a good excuse to occupy public land. These people have no shame. Like a reader wrote yesterday if you try to have a stroll on the Bahar IC Caghaq front these people throw you out saying it is private property. !!

Remove them the sooner the Better !!

Also Caravans like Speedboats should not be allowed to be parked in the streets. They should put them away in a garage and if they don't have one put them in a compound.



Jean-Pierre Aquilina (on 1/10/08)
"...One woman, a pensioner, said she did not afford renting an apartment in summer and her caravan was her only source of recreation..."

If one cannot afford to rent an apartment in summer, then this does not automatically translate into a right to occupy public property. Unfortunately, this has been the case in many areas and one should not forget Armier.

Oh, and seeing the picture, I was of the impression that caravans have wheels...
Christian Abdilla (on 1/10/08)
The picture says it all.....is that a picture of a caravan in this supposedly 'caravan' site ? Is that plastic fencing and plants ? A wooden door ? Modern caravans must be really wonderful to have everything built in !!
steve busuttil (on 1/10/08)
i suppose us mere mortals should have a right to demand that these people remove themselves and their property from public land!

Or should we all take up some public land close to the sea such as Exiles or Qui-Si-Sana and call it our summer home!

How can these people even consider demanding something when they are nothing but squatters?
Michelle Caruana (on 1/10/08)
Just because they've been there for 20 years or more they seem to feel they have the right to stay! The authorities made the mistake in giving them showers / toilets / drains, thereby seemingly sanctioning this mess. Good riddance I say!
Olina Tretyak (on 1/10/08)
Oh, yeah, clear the place from gypsy live-in boxes! Their presence embarrasses "good Catholics" who accustomed the site in question as dating motel in their parked cars. If you stop for an ice-cream at Tony's kiosk, you have a great deal to answer to your children questions where does this road go with such a traffic in and out.
Martin Galea (on 1/10/08)
Diddums. Who the devil do they think they are? If they wanted to enjoy the seaside. then they either save some money, and buy a place somwhere, or else, do what the rest of us mere mortals do, and go for the day. Alternative site indeed. If all else fails, why not use a legal camping site? Oh no, that would mean that money would have to be spent. Dear, dear!!

However, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander, and all illegally built shanty towns ( caravan sites indeed!), should be bulldozed, and the areas encroached upon, rehabilitated. This, as is so often mentioned, would, and should, include ALL places where such eyesores have taken hold, including Mellieha bay, Armier bay, and St Thomas bay, amongst others.

The people in power should realise that a firm stance with these people is what the general populace needs, or rather, expects, from them. Taxpayers' money should not be wasted on mollifying the feelings of squatters, providing them with essential services etc, and rather, spent on getting rid of all encroachers, without exception and any further delay.
Oliver Cardona (on 1/10/08)
I've been a tax cheat for the past 20 years. Now that the the government has caught up with me I demand an alternative tax evasion loophole and I'm going to organise a petition




















.
B Agius (on 1/10/08)
Why are these shacks referred to as 'caravans'?
Chris Ripard (on 1/10/08)
What I find incredible is the attitude of the squatters. Instead of being humble and saying "At least we got away with the (illegal) borrowing of common property for 20 years", they actually complain!

Well done Dr Jason Azzopardi. Keep up the good work.
Anton Spiteri (on 1/10/08)
I fully agree with Mr Abdilla in that Caravan Sites should be only for mobile caravans and permission to use the site should be conditional to using it not more than six months in a calendar year with no option for return in that year. Caravans must be mobile and must be removed from the site when this period is up. In this way no one can start to claim ownership just because they've been (illegally) there for years. I would like to thank the authorities in the name of all law abiding citizens for these long overdue actions.
Mark Vella (on 1/10/08)
I don't blame the authorities for doing so, all Bahar ic-Caghaq (behind Splash and Fun) was occupied last summer, and year after year the site seems to get bigger, and bigger, with some also doing permanent and wall structures. The same case applies to Armier. Not to mention the noise, from generators, stereos, BBQ's, etc.

In Maltese they say 'Mis subgha jiehdu l'id!'

l Galea (on 1/10/08)
Caravans and other big and heavy vehicles should also not be allowed to be parked in the streets but in a garage.
Charles Micallef (on 1/10/08)
The picture says it all..................................

It is clear proof that some people will not only occupy public land in one of the most idyllic sites on the Island,

but as it is proven, some will soon turn it into a third world shunty town..................

and when finally action is taken to clear the mess, then they have the cheek to start petitions,
in the UK they are known as gypsies
Joe Cordina (on 1/10/08)
I too do not afford to rent a holiday apartment for the whole summer. However I have never taken the law into my hands and encroached government land to set up a caravan or take part in a shanty town complex. I too pay my taxes. So I believe that caravan sites are first to be established according to law, then a call for applications is made so anyone interested would apply, and then pay a requisite fee to get and occupy a site.

So please Mr Government remove ALL illegal sites be it in Bahar ic-caghaq, Armier, Ghadira or elsewhere
John A. Azzopardi (on 1/10/08)
For Heaven's, and our own sakes, when are we going to start doing things right ? Why create the need to go from one extreem (supplying water and electricity) to another (a 48 hour notice).
Public land is for the public enjoyment and public use. Most of these "squatters" add insult to injury when they shoosh you off "their land" if you , even nicely, demand a share of that use.
G Abdilla (on 1/10/08)
Wow, about time Lands decided to ACT! get these squatters from public land out immediately. and whilst at it, keep on the work t Armier, little Armier, St Tumas and all other sites. we do not need shanty towns with the excuse of boat houses.

if these people want a caravan site, proper caravan sites should be built, but a caravan means it is movable and not that a container, or a stone room is built and left there for eterity.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku