
Tuesday, 30th September 2008 - 19:33CET
Healthy liquidity, local funding profile, shields banks from overseas turmoil
Finance Minister Tonio Fenech said today that while the international financial turmoil was being closely followed, the local banking system was unlikely to suffer a major impact and depositors and investors had no cause for alarm.
Mr Fenech told Parliament that the local banks held liquidity levels well in access of regulatory requirements although they were being extra careful over where they invested. Indeed, the banks had started building their liquidity reserves as far back as the collapse of Northern Rock Bank in the UK.
He pointed out that last month, at a time when the current storm was already brewing, the IMF assessed the Maltese banks and found they had a low risk of direct contagion because of strong domestic franchises.
Domestic banks had liquid assets that were well above the 30 percent prudential requirement and thus they had no need for wholesale money market funding, relying instead on a strong domestic deposits base.
The banks had strong capital levels that are well in excess of capital adequacy requirements.
Overseas investments were mostly in Europe and well diversified. The investments which had been affected were small.
Mr Fenech said the local banks' exposure to overseas subprime exposure, which was the cause of the current turmoil, was negligible.
He said the banks and the authorities would continue to monitor the situation, and while there was no cause for concern, the government would not shirk from taking the necessary action should it be required.
Opposition finance spokesman Charles Mangion said he had made his own inquiries and agreed witht he minister's assurances.







RSS
Comments
I am sorry to say that you are talking out of ignorance and do not know what the phrase sub prime mortgage really works. In malta if you do not have a good credit rating there is no way that any of the Maltese banks will forward to you any type of loan.
The only way that any of the Maltese banks would have got hit with sub prime mortgages is if they repurchased them on hte international money market. Most banks that extended these sup prime mortgages re packaged them and re sold on the world money market to other institutional investers.
I am not quite sure your statement that the subprime collapse was due to falling prices. From the vast material i have been reading on the subject, the falling prices are due to a lack of easy credit availble for people to buy houses. Therfore driving the prices down to affordable levels in an absence of easy credit.
That would make the price fall a symptom of the collapse not the cause. The supbrime collapse is where lenders have given out mortgages easily to people, who in all probability, should never have benn given a loan. In some cases tehe loans where for 100%. In effect these lenders brought a huige section of the populatoin, previously not able to get on the property ladder due to not having a large enough deposit saved. This brought up the demand for housing, and theefore the prices where inflated due to easy money available. In many cases, the price of the mortgage given, well exceeds the true market value of the house.
Once the subprime market started defaulting en masse - you get the crisis we are currently in.
Also add that the subprime crisis also had a bad economy performance to push it further. If people cannot pay up their loans, banks reposses the property and then they sell it. In case where no one can buy property and where the property market is now full with unsold properties, their price will fall and thus banks cannot sell them.
Can we have statistics from banks on what's situation right now in regard to properties which have been taken due to defaulting loans? IF we have situations of a mass layoff, for example if ever ST pulled out, are the banks prepared to a potential rise in loans not being met?
I think what started the problem in the USA is not the slide in property values but the loose credit mentally that banks and mortgage companies operated under. In other words mortgages were extended to individual home buyers who didn't qualify for one in the first place. The drop in property values is the result of the foreclosures brought about by many homeowners who could not afford to make the monthly mortgage payments.