
Tuesday, 30th September 2008 - 16:18CET
UPDATED: Government makes 'take it or leave it' offer to lecturers - unions disappointed
The Finance Ministry has warned trade unions representing university lecturers that it would withdraw a packet of pay increases offered to them in the past few weeks if they continue to refuse it. The ministry said its proposals would substantially improve the pay of the university academic staff and cost the country more than €55 million over six years.
Reacting to comments made this morning by the leaders of the Malta Union of Teachers and the University of Malta Academic Staff Association, the Finance Ministry said the pay demands being made by the unions were unrealistic. Were they to be accepted, they would cost the country €140 million over six years.
In publishing the union requests, the ministry pointed out that in some grades, they would amount to an immediate increase of 80%.
The unions earlier today revealed part of the governemnt offer and ordered the lecturers to strike tomorrow. See http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20080930/local/university-lecturers-to-strike-tomorrow
Trade unions’ request
|
Grade |
Current package |
Packet requested for 2009 |
Packet requested for 2014 |
|
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
Professor |
37,806 |
69,285 |
85,993 |
|
Associate Profs |
34,466 |
64,203 |
79,350 |
|
Senior Lecturer |
31,118 |
57,677 |
70,514 |
|
Lecturer |
27,371 |
48,851 |
59,514 |
|
Asst Lecturer (MA) |
24,251 |
32,955 |
39,720 |
|
Asst Lecturer |
22,635 |
31.249 |
37,672 |
Government offer
|
Grade |
Current package |
Packet offered for 2009 |
Packet offered for 2014 |
|
|
€ |
€ |
€ |
|
Professor |
37,806 |
41,560 |
64,800 |
|
Associate Profs |
34,466 |
37,376 |
55,843 |
|
Senior Lecturer |
31,118 |
32,311 |
44,156 |
|
Lecturer |
27,371 |
28,377 |
38,066 |
|
Asst Lecturer (MA) |
24,251 |
25,392 |
31,417 |
|
Asst Lecturer |
22,635 |
23,584 |
29,263 |
In a reaction to the government statement, the UMASA and the MUT in a joint statement this evening said they were asking academic staff to study the offered remuneration carefully.
"Take senior lecturers for example, who constitute a significant proportion of the academic staff at the University. The remuneration in 2008 of €31,118 (Lm13,358) is based on a collective agreement that expired in 2003, with a slight correction in 2007 to keep us in line with the civil service salaries to which the old agreement had been pegged. Now, five years after expiry of this collective agreement, and in the context of wide-ranging reforms at the University which will directly affect the working conditions of the academic staff, adding a significantly increased commitment that they have to give to the University, the government offers in 2009 a total package of €32,311 (Lm 13,871), a “generous” increase of €1,193 (Lm 512) or 3.8%.
"This assumption is based on the further shaky assumption that all deserving academic staff members will receive the full performance bonus, as has been the case to date, but for which there is no guarantee in the future.
"The offered package will increase to €44,156 (Lm 18,956), but this over six further years (i.e. a full eleven years after the expiry of the existing collective agreement)!
"If one calculates the increases from the total 2003 salary over the eleven years, this works out to an annual increase of about 4.5%. All of this is being offered to academics who were already underpaid in 2004."
The unions said they were surprised and disappointed that after two years of intense negotiations over a comprehensive package intended to reform the University, the government was now threatening to withdraw the whole package and decline to support its investment in Malta’s most valuable asset – its human resources and future generations.







RSS
Comments
Do we need Computing Teachers in our Schools? Why these students did not manage to graduate?
If you think academics work 3 hours a day....then you are very misinformed. It *may* be true that students interact with lecturers for only 3 hours a day....but you seem to be unaware of what an academic career involves. We do not only lecture......to undergraduate students. We also supervise postgraduates (MPhils, MSc and PhDs)....we setup new courses, we apply for EU funding, we negotiate project agreements, we administer projects awarded, both technically and many times from a financial perspective, we attend project meetings, we attend board meetings for which Government appoints us due to our expertise (and many times and nil fees), we manage our labs and meet our well-trained lab officers to plan and do so, we meet foreigners visiting our University and also host delegations from eg Malta Enterprise to help them attract FDI to Malta, we plan labs, we select equipment, we prepare presentations of research work we present at international conferences, we interact with various stakeholders such as FOI, MCST, Malta Enterprise, Ministries, we try to find time to do our own research etc.& you think this is done in 3 hours? Please: distinguish between part-time & full-time academics!
No. 1---->I quote: "Isn't a Univ lecturer equal to a CEO". On what grounds?? In what way?? In that they have a 50/50 chance of sharing the same gender possibly. Everything that their job entails is different. There is no argument as to what is more "useful" or "difficult" because that is for no one to judge- certainly not me or you.....Yet the fact is that the CEOs that do get paid better than lecturers do so because they are a rarer commodity, and/or are more sought after. Plain economics (not too confusing I trust).
No.2---> I quote: "Why not compare wages with counterpart EU countries". First of all you can go on wikipedia and check it out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor#Salary_of_professors_.28Europe.29
.
according to the above, turns out our dear professors already earn more than those in Belgium, France and Sweden. Their requested package would make them the best paid professors in Europe. Out of all the countries mentioned, Malta has the LOWEST GDP per capita.....so how on earth are the proposed wages even fathomable? In any case, it is ridiculous to demand what academics get in other countries without considering the cost of living.
These Lecturers (and unions) remind me of Aladdin rubbing on his magic lamp and requesting his wishes to the genie. As if the government can afford paying the wages requested and really and truly why should lecturers earn that kind of money when other professionals working in Malta are earning far less. If other countries are offering high remuneration, go work abroad. Now you can.
Personally I would change the whole academic system and invest in a broadband infrastructure where virtual professors can teach students at the comfort of their own home. Let's move ahead. This will save government, students, parent’s and taxpayers a heap load of money.
I just spent over 1000 euro on my two boys on uniforms and books. For God's sake, they are still 5 year old (twins) attending year 1.
Well done to the government for sticking to your guns but ...
move on.
Not even in the EU, because they earn MUCH less than what the unions are expecting.
The problem is (and present in most of the Maltese system) THERE IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY. Check how many lecturers miss lecturers, get some feedback from students and see for yourselves.
Please be realistic in your salary requests, getting 14.9% MORE in 2009 than a UK counterpart is a bit over the top. You deserve a comesurate salary BUT remove those bad apples, because as I see it that's the only chance you have.
In the end it is not the lecturer who makes the student get the grades and excel in his/her studies, but the student him/her-self. If a student wants something they strive for it, and beat the system...Thats the idea....you never allow the system to beat you. You work your guts out and the results are produced!
A lecturer can't always try to g ain the credit for a student's achievments. The lecturers may use this as an excuse a lot, they don't spoon feed the students. To me it'sanother way of saying, hey I'm just there to talk, it's up to the student to understand what I'm saying, not myself. But the very worst part of being in Univesity in Malta, is putting up with the disastrous syllabus. Where you learn a lot of useless (out_of_date) nonsense, all for nothing, just to answer a single question in the_exam if it_even_comes_out.
A better pay will not make lecturers any better then they already are. It will help motivate you, to be better, but then it's all down to the passion you have for teaching that subject and your ability to teach.
I can attest to the fact that there are some lecturers who are excellent teachers and others who are overworked but still approach their job with passion. However, others are a disgrace to the profession. According to my 5 year long research (sitting on my behind in lecture rooms), it appears that the higher the grade, the lower the quality.
Some senior lecturers and professors don't have the very first idea about teaching. I hate to have to say this, but teaching does not involve reading from a book. I can do that perfectly fine on my own at home, thank you very much. Similarly, reciting slides and mumbling incoherently while students are trying to write down a copy of said slides (because you do not provide a copy), does no good because it is impossible to concentrate on both writing and listening to the lecturer at the same time.
Do these people deserve the pay rise they are asking for? Sure, preparing those slides took time, but surely not €80k worth of time! Go tell that to all those who failed exams due to their lecturers' negligence and incompetence.
Where does the ability to teach come from? You gain it with experience but also you usually are born with that ability. It is not an ability one decides to take on when their pay is heavilly increased....
All a pay increase does is motivate, but there are other ways of motivating employees. Lecturers should be motivated to provide a good lecture by their passion to teach a subject they are experienced in, as well as their interest in that subject. Without the passion for teaching that subject, you have a bad lecturer. And I've come across many, and heard about many.
What I'm saying is, a pay increase of that exageration is not going to make a difference.
Wake up, to the real world please.
Can the Honourable Minister Tonio Fenech explain how he came up with that amount ?
Can we get some real facts here ?
Can we safeguard our University and not run the risk of what happened in the health sector when Malta lost such precioius expertise because of a feud with the government ?
Since when has a member of the FLIMKIEN KOLLOX POSSIBLI group given such an arrogant ultimatum ?
Again, please could someone provide me with fresh data regarding the average wages in Malta? Please? Thank you
@ Mr. Buhagiar
Dear Sir, I am still waiting for an answer from you regarding how many hours you work a week / year? Full time, part time? One has to compare peer with peer.
@ Mr. Noel Cutajar
Many thanks. This is a very good example and I can have a better picture now regarding what is happening regarding the Maltese Police Forces. You see, one of my favorite Uncle, now retired, also used to be a Police Officer (in Rennes, a big city North West of France) and he unfortunately also always complained about the same. Police do a great, difficult, sometimes dangerous job and, as such, should also be rewarded accordingly. You have my full support.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professor#Salary_of_professors_.28Europe.29
Leave University, leave Malta and as a result improve your quality of life and standard of living.
I've been there.
One of the reasons for the lecturers pay comes from the fact that the goverment gives money to students via stipends and this is not done anywhere else..
Students abroud have to pay for university or work hard for a scholaship with no funding from the government. Hence why the lecturers probably would have a higher wage abroud. . I am not saying that the government should remove stipends because I agree with them 100%.
All I am saying is that these lecturers need to be realistic... and yes if you want a higher wage then what this country has to offer.. then why not move abroud.. and goodluck to you after..
Not even in the commercial industry highly qualified persons are paid that much. And what are the number of hours done by these professors at the unviversity and at home (if any) and therefore what would be the rate.
Now I will not talk about the quality of material and lectures being done by these lecturers because from what I hear from students some of the material is either copied from books or else the subject matter is not clearly taught.
However the demands are just out of this world. One cannot compare the salaries abroad with Malta just for one sector and if the government gives in this could ripples on all the other industries...and would be just a disaster.
My message to the lecturers would be "remember the famous doctor's strike in the past?"...please don't let the same happen.
Double the payroll Double the teachers' laziness.
Most of the lecturers at University have a part-time job apart from the primary job thus they surrely do not have any problems with regards to money. Most of the teachers teach private lessons also.
The goverment should keep his stance and not pay the amount requested by the MUT which is causing unneccessary trouble just to show that the union is doing "something" for its members once in a year.
What a total plonker... compared to England and Germany, almost all of us are getting peanuts here and not just lecturers!! Besides I have not seen many people improve their motivation via a payrise only. How many hours in the year do these people work??
which is out of proportion with the standard wages.
However, i think i know from where these lecturers got the idea. My son , who decided to take up residence in Luxemburg , who incidentally Is a teacher and worked his way through 2 B EDUCS earns euros 2000 per month for working only 25 hours per week.
How is that for wages?
As one of the "lawyers" who don't practice in Court, I can firmly assure you that I do serve my country (and yourself) with committment and dedication in such a way that I'm giving you back your "investment" in my education. As you said, law is a "profession" and therefore I believe that 18 (when one generally chooses one's area of study) it is too young to decide what one is to do with the rest of one's life, leading to what you seem to so vehemently condemn - a change of mind and heart. The law course gives you the education and aptitude necessary for many areas of work, and it would be highly restrictive to limit the outcome of 6 years of study to whether one litigates in Court. The law graduate who works in other areas still uses the knowledge acquired in the law course, such as writing skills and legal interpretation, and in general makes a very good job out of what he or she would be doing. The law course does not produce merely litigators, but mostly young professionals with a quick mind who are able to use it in many areas!
It's sad that society no longer values educators or education. These Lecturers are shaping the next generation of professionals, show them some respect. On the flipside, some lecturers need to fixup themselves, as some are a joke. Maybe if the university offered better pay, the best intellectuals would teach instead of going to make money in the private sector. Think about it.
you seem to be quite informed about the whole situation in Malta. Could you please tell me the way you reached the conclusions (amongst others) that maltese teachers and communication studies are "not really needed by the country" and that law students study law not for the profession but because it is a status symbol??? You should seriously consider becoming a psychologist since you know why more than hundreds of students study law or else...why not consider taking up the post of Minister for Education? Let's say the government takes up your very bright idea of not giving stipend to law students...who would consider taking up the law course if it is one of those underprivileged courses? It would be much more difficult for you (being a psychologist or whatever) to find a suitable young lawyer to defend your rights! But...then who cares...i think you don't need a lawyer because you already know your rights...
If the Academic staff think they have low wages they really do not know what life can offer!!
I'd like to see some lecturers write in and justify the wage increases they are asking for. That would really be interesting to read!
As many have said the lecturers' service leaves much to be desired, but it is not only about turning up late or not being available for their students or using decades old notes. How much research do these lecturers do? How many papers do they publish? And I mean work that they do themselves. Slapping their names on the results of their PhD students' hard work just so they can head of to a conference in some exotic destination doesn't count!
Dear Sir, thank you for answer. Are salaries talks a taboo in Malta? Again I cannot find any relevant data even on European websites. I agree with you that 738 euros a month is not much considering the spiraling local prices.
May I ask you if you work full time (like 8 to 5 or more) and the whole year long?
Thanks, Loïc
- there are some Lecturers who become such with practically no working experience in their field
- there are some Lecturers who rarely go to give lectures
- WE pay stipends to students in some courses whose graduates are not really needed by the country (such as teachers of Maltese and the Communication studies)
- WE pay stipends to students who take courses to graduate in a profession which is more of a status symbol than a profession for them ( such as many of those who chose law and then never go to the law courts in their lives, becoming Media Officers, Editors, Journalists, presenters, violin players, etc ) or else leave the country as soon as they graduate
AND THEN IT SEEMS THAT THE DRYDOCKS WORKERS WERE THE ONLY CLASS OF WORKERS WASTING PUBLIC FUNDS !!!
Why not remove stipends for courses which are not really needed and increase the stipends for those courses needed by the country ?? Or else bind graduates to work in their profession in Malta for a number of years otherwise they would have to refund stipends ?
Hm.....Government salary....well mine is Euro 738 a month after taxes are cut.....not to mention that I have a post grad qualification.....shouldnt we get a consistent payrise?? Truth is that with the Government you just have a rubbish job......and a rubbish salary.
The whole tertiary sector needs a radical rethink. While the university is starved of resources as can be witnessed by such facilities as the library, millions are frittered away in stipends. I concede that there are students who need financial assistance but such assistance should be targeted to the really needy cases.
Perhaps the best manner to resolve this dispute is to refer it to industrial arbitration. Certainly, academic staff deserve a better salary package but there should not be automaticity in the performance bonus as this renders it ineffective. The bonus should be bolstered and given to those who really deserve it, not across the board. As it happens, deserving academics are being lumped with less deserving ones.
Whereas resources have been found to finance a 60m euro early retirement scheme for dockyard workers (on top of another 100 m euro debt incurred over 4 years), the country should not be stingy with those who form our intellectual capital.
Wake up to reality of the present situation and stop trying to milk the sacred cow with the rest of them!
You hit bull's eyes mate. Certain people still think that Educators (Professors, lecturers and so on) aren't as much needed as those positions you did mention. No such grumbling, (sometimes made just so to say something) was made in their regards. People must start understanding the fact that these people (Lecturers) are forming the people of tomorrow. Those who will eventually will be governing this island, thus many of your children and nephews. I'm sure you want the best for them. Well, to have really qualified people in the future, they must have had the best of people lecturing them.
People seem to agree that we need a state of the art University, but want that to happen miraculously. No input is to be made, according to them. It isn't the building that makes the University, but the lecturers and the students. Ours is quite a good Univ and that is thanks to our lecturers as well. But this is not appreciated as it should be.
In fact, some lecturers are actually there to HINDER students' progress, from my personal experience at University.
As Mr. John Borg well said ... are all professors, qualified? What is being linked with this deal? Will lecturers become more efficient? I don't think so ..... just money down the drain.
one last thing....the gov. is playing a dirty game here, if the payment increase issue is seen out of context then it may sound really high, I am curious to see what else has the gov. asked out of these lecturers, which restrictions has he imposed on them for their unions to request such increases. I don't think that UMASA and MUT are a crazy, irresponsible lot....think ppl...think
Let us look at the respective increases proposed. The increases proposed by the Government are those in brackets.
Assistant Lecturer: 38% (4.2%), Asst Lecturer (MA): 35.9%, (4.7%), Lecturer: 78.5% (3.68%), Senior Lecturer: 85.4% (3.83%), Associate Prof: 94.9% (8.44%), Prof: 83.26% (9.93%)
Perhaps, they need to realise that in industry such meteoric salary raises (proposed by Trade Unions) are inexistent! Nevermind the starting points (which, yes are unjustifiably low), it's a no go. And the Government is right in not accepting such increase in salaries.
While highly qualified and offering an important contribution to our society, most lecturers do not have the same pressures as industrial professionals. Fact.
A stratification of lecturers is important - ICT/Engineering lecturers are sacrificing notable opportunities in industry while other lecturers are happy to cling on where they are since they would struggle to find posts outside. Others may top up their salary with consultancy posts(medicine, law, architecture).
On the other hand, the Government should commit to invest a substantial amount in University facilities and research. There's no use increasing lecturers' salaries if the facilities are poor.
Most probably, the govt. ommitted indirectly the extra perks and benefits, such profession brings over ... e.g. private consultancy, reimbursed travel to EU conferences, discounted deals with textbook suppliers, sponsorships, sabatical leave and so on, so forth.
Their services are indeed required by our society, but one needs to look into the whole present economic scenario before requesting astronomical figures! In no way, i am trying to downgrade their profession. But we need to be as realistic as possible and stop "bargaining for more" and sabotage the government all the time. Firstly, we need to improve our productivity, considerably, before embarking on new negotiations. Society demands that everyone is treated equally and with respect. Noone will take this deal unnoticed and eventual repercussions are defenitely expected, and in the pipeline on other industries and union controlled environments.
If the unions' demands are unrealistic than a sensible government would aim to reach a sensible compromise before threatening an entire industry (incidentally one of the most important industries in the state) in such a manner. This is disrespectful to a society who only ask to have a much better education. It is a shame that government does not really care about seriously investing in a better education for all. Building quality schools is a step in the right direction but what about investing in quality service?
Let it put it straight I see that time for unions these days is over and the only solution for their survival is to migrate to Africa and fight workers rights' there. Here now we have good legislation to favour workers rights .......Unions than never talk of OBLIGATIONS & DUTIES.
Govt. must propose extra bonuses based on productivity. simple as that.
Probably to add insult to injury lecturers in economy tell us that presently we are in a global financial crisis....who are the culprits than??
Do we want a first class university or a third world one?
If you really think that you can get more money elswhere why not just leave?