Ivan Camilleri, Brussels
Brussels wants liquidation of Malta Shipyards
File photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
The European Commission is piling pressure on the government to declare Malta Shipyards bankrupt and liquidate the company before continuing the process of privatisation of all or parts of its assets.
Commission sources told The Times yesterday that the Commission's position did not change following last week's visit to Malta by Commissioner Neelie Kroes and that Brussels still feels that the best formula to be adopted in order to start a new shipyards operation with a clean sleet is liquidation.
"Under normal commercial circumstances, a company that is no longer viable and is registering losses, like Malta Shipyards, is declared bankrupt and put to liquidation. Although we see this as the most logical step forward, we will not impose it on the government as long as the privatisation process does not involve further state aid."
This rigid position by Brussels has been adopted in view of plans by the government, announced earlier this year, to absorb about €100 million in losses that are expected to accumulate by the end of this year when the seven-year restructuring deal agreed with the EU ends. Despite almost €1 billion pumped into Malta Shipyards over the past years, the company remains in the red.
At the meetings in Malta between the government and Ms Kroes, the government reiterated its intention to absorb the accumulated losses of the shipyards before passing over the company to the new operator, The Times was told. The commissioner insisted that could not be done under state aid rules and that a different solution had to be found.
This stand was reiterated yesterday, although in more diplomatic terms, by the commissioner's spokesman who wanted to further clarify the comments Ms Kroes made to the press prior to her departure from Malta.
"Ms Kroes said that the present restructuring plan, launched in October 2001, has failed to restore the viability of the shipyards and, therefore, cannot be the basis for the grant of further state aid," the spokesman said.
He pointed out that the European Commission agrees with privatisation "as long as this does not entail the grant of state aid either to the purchaser(s) or to Malta Shipyards Ltd".
If Malta Shipyards is liquidated, as the Commission is suggesting, the company will be declared bankrupt and all workers remaining on its books will be declared redundant with no right for compensation other than stipulated by law.
A senior government official said yesterday that talks with the Commission were ongoing in order to try to find a more "socially acceptable solution". However, he admitted that the position adopted by the Commission "is not being taken lightly".
"The government wants to ensure that all workers who apply to leave their job at the shipyards will be given a decent compensation and not just what is due to them by law if the company is declared bankrupt. That is why we are insisting to take a different approach from that suggested by the Commission," the official said.
He explained that, so far, the government has not made any formal privatisation plan to Brussels and will only do so when the bidder/s are chosen by the government. "Only at that stage will we know how the new operator(s) plan to manage the shipyards and it will be only then that plans can be given to Brussels for approval."
Meanwhile, Polish shipyard workers are facing the same difficult situation as their Maltese counterparts.
Hundreds of dockers protested outside Ms Kroes's office in Brussels last Tuesday in view of a Commission decision, expected later this year, on the restructuring of three shipyards in Poland.
Polish workers fear that their shipyards in Gdansk, Gdynia and Szczecin will be forced to close down if the European Commission rules that they must repay the state aid given to them illegally over the past years by the Polish government.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Petrol price up 6c
'No need for early election if PM's...
In Discussion
54 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
philip pace
Sep 20th 2008, 20:42
To Mrs Mary Pace,
You are right in a naive way re the rules of economics as written in the book but here we are dealing with a bigger problem that involves us whether we like it or not. A problem that a rule book never mentions as it is just theory.
Re the rest of your writing, I couldn't see the point by what you meant re the 95% surcharge and blaming it all on the GWU.
What was your point exactly? Maybe you can explain in a straight and clear way whay you really mean.
G.HOARE
Sep 20th 2008, 19:19
How come every time there is a problem in malta with what ever IT IS ,it turns politically wether its the PN or MLP it would still be our problem , our problems comes from greedy outsiders they rather take thier work to cheap CHINA then using europeans shipyards like MALTA , i am sure the maltese done alot of good work but the greed won over , the amont of jobs lost to China ,factorys that shut down in MALTA all the job losses we suffered , maybe if us MALTESE BELIVE AND BE PROUD IN MALTESE PRODUCT we would not have to suffer nor will the ship yard employees, they had the chance to change to allternative work and manifacture other work withen the ship yard but they rather sat on thier back side or sleeping all day ,Never bite the hand that feeds you , MAYBE JUST MAYBE THE FUTURE CAN BE BRIGHT GET ON OUR FEET AND SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS FIRST ,
Frank Cachia
Sep 20th 2008, 17:40
Everyone is missing the point that successive maltese governments used the malta shipyards for their political agenda. I remember times when workers who were made redundant from other companies where thrown in at malta drydocks. Without even doing the apprenticeship that I have to do for 4 years. They are mixed with the yard's skilled workers and it ended up in a huge skilled and unskilled workforce!!!! Who will carry the wrong doing now the workers or the governments?
a.dalli
Sep 20th 2008, 15:26
Suspect that there is a local government hidden agenda on this issue. Italy has a much bigger problem with Alitalia and no such pressure yet has been exherted. In the passed Alitalia has been saved from the brink of bankruptcy on a number of occassions - with government money one must add. Then why us, why Malta. If the shipyrds do close down, who is to gain - will it be the Italian yards?
Mary Pace
Sep 20th 2008, 10:38
To Mr. Philip Pace.
The rules of economics apply to all industries indiscriminately.The Goverment can nt continue to subsidize the docks according t EU regulations and because of it's responsabilities to Taxpayer's money. Other industry workers who became redundant were not given compensation above what the law stipulates. Therfoe what makes the dock workers more privilidged.
Where is the GRTU's voice in all this farce? It's members have been persecuted by Tax compliance for the past four years in a natonal effort to regularize the deficit and now after so much sacrifice by our self-employed, Government is arrogantly going to squander all those millions to cover the Docks and It's workers.
Furthurmore, The Nationalist Govermnet imposed a 95% surcharge on utilities because it was unable to cushion the inflated price of crude oil. Inspite of the drop in the price of crude, the surcharge is still at it's maximum while simultaneously it offers the hundred million euro write-off to the dockyards and arrogantly offers a handsome compensation to a bunch of workers who have been fleecing us dry for decades.
The core problem of the Malta Drydocks was the GWU. Let them pay the compensation!!!
philip pace
Sep 20th 2008, 09:40
To N. Azzopardi,
Your latest statement was very factual and can be understood!
One has to understand that a company like the Dockyard is a very different company like those formed from the1970s up to yesterday, leaving out the banks, Airmalta, Seamalta and other Govt related companies. Of course the same rules apply but the Drydocks is a giant of a company, for many reasons and therefore one has to tread very carefully here as it has a large workforce, many sections, etc and most of all a very large area.
If a company does not perform well for a large number of years and the company knows that the workers are doing their best to their professional capabilities then where did it go wrong? Have a guess!
Just compare the skills of a tradesman from the Dockyard to any other tradesman coming from the Govt/Private and see the difference.
What would happen to the Drydocks workforce and area once it has been closed down? Have another guess!
I can understand the problems of the Dockyard as I worked there. Got the point now?
Joseph Ellul
Sep 20th 2008, 00:46
@m.Zamit. You sure spit the dummy and I do not blame you but when workers misbehave and get away with it , this means bad supervision and management. The truth is that some workers abused the system and also others produced private work. This happens all over the world and the worst offenders are politicians who divide the workers by showing preferential treatment to some but not to others.Malta Hydo were closed and people lost their jobs becuase there were no contracts to get etc. That was a simple procedure. The MDD was used as a national exchange bank.The losses made were paper losses. Look at the current financial situation. The Maltese banks are feasible and in the black but the short sellers are harming the banking system. Consider that in the case of the MDD the short sellers were the politicians, then what chance has the MDD of survival? Consider if the maltese govt. takes the contract as the agent for MDD for 100 units and takes its commision of say 25% but leaves the payments in central bank in foriegn currency and then pays MDD when the exchange rate is in favour of the agent? Sliem ghalikom
Martin Zamit
Sep 19th 2008, 11:36
May I remind Mr Axisa that in their 30 or so years of existance as the Malta shipyards very little was actually produced and as for them employing people it would have been better if they were all sent home and payed a wage to do nothing as it would have cost the tax payer a lot less money in the long run. Hundreds did nothing productive for years on end yet had the cheek to use Malta ship yards tools and materials for their own private gain. As for Mr Micallef's comments I can safely say that it was a very small nucleus of workers that actually did any real work and most of the highly skilled employees left the yards years ago. What are you suggesting? We continue to subsidise a failed industry with our hard earned cash? When Malta Hydrofoils of Marsaxlokk shut its gates due to lack of productivity and all 30 or so employees including myself were made redundant not a single voice was raised. We weren't making money so we were shut down. Simple. And so should the ship yards. Its good riddance to bad rubbish.
Daniel Russell
Sep 19th 2008, 11:15
What a reminder of the 1980s here in Britain, with mass privatisation! We are paying for it now and we dont own anything anymore. In Malta as here, I am sure this deal will make a few people very rich and a lot will lose out. Don't do what we did and squander our heavy industry, spoken like a true Black Countryman!
J Micallef
Sep 19th 2008, 10:46
This version is somewhat different from what Hon. Tonio Fenech said yesterday at the Fossos.
Anyway, I can only blame the politicians for the state of the MDD. They are the ones that appointed the management, and they are the ones that politicised the workers at the MDD.
An now, even if a different political party in govt, the politicians feel guilty and wat to give the MDD employees a 'decent payoff'.
What gives them this special right?
What should the govt do to all those employees that lost their job after a career of hard work, paying the NI and taxes?
This is an offence to all decent citizens. So whether MDD employees are productive or not - the taxpayer still carries their weight!
Unfortuantley, many MDD staff are highly skilled and very busy people, and we, in Malta, were unable to create a niche market for their work.
This has happened over and over again - we are unable to market our skills, instead, we close up all the places where we have most value added and instead start importing and retailing.
Why can't we cater for upmarket, niche clients instread?
What's next after MDD - Airmalta?
Ray Axisa
Sep 19th 2008, 09:46
I can't see why the shipyards cannot be saved, all they have to do is change its name to BANK and there should be no problem for the government to buy it?? after all what is the difference in saving a Bank or Insurance company?? at least the Shipyards produced something and employed a lot of people, can the same be said of a bank or Insurance company??
Joseph Ellul
Sep 19th 2008, 09:18
FYI. The tender system at the MDD was in foriegn currency: always. Wages were paid in local currency. Now for the nitty gritty. If you have ever worked in sales you would know that there is a factor (%) called COMMISION. This is very popular and was extremely used in the case of the MDD. The workers were told that a certian ship was coming in for repairs but it had to be out by a certian time. For a while all went well and sometimes a small bonus was given out. Then came the bad part. The MDD started loosing money again. I worked at the MDD and believe me when I tell you that every worker deserves every penny,cent or eura that he got. Why don't you ask how many people died from work related illness from the MDD. Do not blame the workers. The PN and MLP did not close MDD because it was always used as a foriegn exchange bank but now it is all EURO!!!! Malta DOES NOT need it any more. Yes close the MDD but give the workers the redunduncy payments. Its only money. Sliem ghalikom.
Mike Jones
Sep 19th 2008, 09:02
I love it how some people are taking it out on the EU! Like an ostrich Malta has kept it's head in the ground, I guess in hope that the shipyards problem would fly away. This is the usual irresponsible finger pointing attitude that plagues our country. There was over 20 Years to figure this one out!
1Billion euros later the government insists on taking the burden of years of mismanagement . The EU's reaction is to slap the idiots in power in the face and ask to take the more sensible approach. How much MORE do we want to spend? Haven't we taken enough damage, may I say it again: "a billion Euros". Who's Euros? mine!, yours! the people who actually work, and hard! It's for ample reasons like these that the cash flow in Malta is slow.
We can't continue squandering money like idiots! we have emerging markets to compete with and a recession very likely on the way. Shape up, stop being obtuse and look at the bigger picture once in a while.
R. Azzopardi
Sep 19th 2008, 08:36
Oh and another thing.
I can bet my bottom dollar that all those who are up in arms against the government and the EU for privatising, liquidating, closing-down the MDD are usually those who rant ad nauseum about the taxes they pay, the water and electricy surcharge, VAT, etc etc etc. Can't they realise that a substantial amount of these taxes are being mercilessly shovelled into a bottomless pit called the MDD? Those funds could be put to very good use.
R. Azzopardi
Sep 19th 2008, 08:28
Why all this fuss? As far as I know, any loss-making enterprise usually throws in the towel, shows its employees the door and closes down. That's what happened to me a couple of years ago when the firm I worked for hit hard times. On a last-in, first-out basis, a number of employees (me included) were asked to leave there and then. What have MDD employees got more than me? My heart goes out to them. I pity them and their families but hey, the Maltese people just cannot keep subsidising them. Unfortunately we live in a dog-eat-dog, survival-of-the-fittest world.
Francis Attard
Sep 19th 2008, 05:12
Thanks to the EU, the drydocks issue will soon be part of the past. No more taxpayers' money down the drain.
A problem less to the government, whether it will be a 'blue' one or a 'red' one.
Martin Zammit
Sep 19th 2008, 04:39
It seems that the Maltese Government and a sizable portion of the population want to have the cake and eat it. Malta is recieving large sums of funding from the EU and somehow thinks that it can squander the money as it sees fit. And pumping any money into the MDD is precisely that-squandering. Enough of the Maltese tax payers money has been wasted on countless frivolous subsidies that should have been stopped long ago. Too many have suckled with impunity for too long. Thankfully it is coming to an end. Shame no Maltese Government past or present ever had the guts to do it sooner. We could have saved ourselves vast sums of money.
V Fenech
Sep 19th 2008, 01:13
Who really brought the situation of ending up absorbing all those losses????
The PN government in its plan to destroy the shipyards! Because I still remember the pn promising no downsizing and blustering that the MDD was really improving!!
Do you really believe that Gonzi did not know that the EU Commissioner was going to stop him????
Everything has been planned finely for the workers to leave silently and the yards will be transformed into a construction estate. Finally their dream is coming true!!
J Martinelli
Sep 19th 2008, 00:57
@ Daley
You just don't have a clue.
You are so utterly confused, whatever you write is at best comical, at worst - tragic!
Antoine Vella (Balzan)
Sep 19th 2008, 00:25
Those who are comparing the MDD with Alitalia should know some facts. Unlike MDD, Alitalia (which had already been privatised years ago) has been officially declared bankrupt last month and is now run by a special commissioner.
Unlike MDD, Alitalia did not have its debts written off but was given a ‘loan’ which would have had to be repaid (if the company survived, that is). Even this loan, however is being investigated by the EU and may not be allowed. The latest news is that Alitalia is likely to be liquidated and cease to exist.
Believe it or not, EU regulations are the same for all countries and many of the larger ones such as France and the UK have occasionally fallen foul of various rules and been penalised.
If the MDD is declared bankrupt, Government will not lose the 100 million Euros - well, not all of them anyway. Liquidating the company and selling off its assets could offset some of the losses.
It is an ignominous end to the once-proud (too proud?) Dockyard but I don’t see any use of prolonging the agony – might as well pull the plug.
N.Azopardi
Sep 18th 2008, 23:03
@Philip Pace
If you read well my statement, I said that all those involved in the MDD be it admin or workforce, so that includes the management as well. I have never worked there, but when one of my Companies went bankrupt, we were faced with bills from Enemalta, WSC, Tax, Social Security, employers terminal benefits, and only we the shareholders had to face the music. There was no one to subsides or there were no dues which we didn't fork out. We had to pay whatever was due. That is Bankruptcy. MDD should not be any different from any other Companies or entities, and that what the EU are saying. I hope that I made it clear now for you.
A Calleja
Sep 18th 2008, 19:46
This is precisely why we voted for the EU... to cut the non-sense.
Great job Brussels!
alfred agius
Sep 18th 2008, 19:15
The Minister of Finance, with the approval of the PM, served the GWU and the Shipyard workers with an ultimatum - to decide by mid-September, or else...
I still remember a write up in the Times by Berta Sullivan to this effect.
Brussels, through Ms. Kroes. has now served the minister and his Cabinet with an ultimatumthat is due to expire by mid December. What a humiliating mess for the Government. I wonder where the wonder PN MEP`s were doing in Brussels. Surely they have slept over their job or else were never in the Government`s `Yard Privitisation Think Tank if ever there was one.
And has Berta lost her pen ? Her comment on Ms Kloes visit to the Island are very much overdue now...
Loïc Le Brun
Sep 18th 2008, 18:10
It might no sound serious but I sometimes wonder: Wouldn't it have been better to close the shipyards several years ago and distribute the Eur 1 billion among the workers?
How much would it have been per person?
philip pace
Sep 18th 2008, 16:23
N. Azzopardi,
The opening of my blog was 'Without entering the political village arena between the blues and the reds as that is a very negative attitude, this situation is not adding up. '
So according to you the fault goes way back in 1970 (re the 9 months strike), Mintoff (whom you know so well as to perceive what he thought in those days) and the hundreds of MDD workers. Therefore the losses accumulated from the 1980s and not in the 1990s and even the 2000s as you pointed out.
And in some 20 years later what has happened ?
Such negative, ridiculous and pompous assumptions.
According to your perfect world, the management had no fault?
With my writing I must have hit you on very sore spot for you to come out blazing madly like that by trying to give me your side of story which is not that very convincing as you are seeing it as how it fits you.
Did you ever work there, Mr. Azzopardi? I'm sure you did as you know the 'facts' very well!
A Daley
Sep 18th 2008, 16:23
Ooops what's this?
The European Commission is piling pressure on the government to declare Malta Shipyards bankrupt and liquidate the company before continuing the process of privatisation of all or parts of its assets.
So does that mean that the Govt. does not even understand what they signed for WHEN JOINING THE EU?
Tajba hekk Martinelli?
So, how does it go again?
The European Commission is piling pressure on the government to declare Malta Shipyards bankrupt and liquidate the company before continuing the process of privatisation of all or parts of its assets.
KMB was and still is right and David Cameron in UK is also correct to refuse any more powers going to the EU.
So, dear Martinelli, what has KMB and David Cameron got in common?
They don't share the same political views, surely!
Yet, they are united against a United States of Europe.
In the accession treaty, why did PN not negotiate accept maybe divorce which would surely BE LEGALISED IN MALTA?
Deceit and lies. That's what we had, and some swallowed the bate like a bunch of hungry fish blinded in a small pond of murky water.
L-aqwa li ghandna l-Euro (sorry Ewro) hi!
E. Azzopardi
Sep 18th 2008, 16:16
That is correct. A company which is no longer viable and is making huge losses besides having had €1 billion in subsides ( and now we also want to write off another €100 million) should be declared bankrupt. Isn't that the normal business practice with other companies?
I am not against ''giving the workers a decent compensation besides that stipulated by law''
but hey then give to all other workers!!!! What is wrong with the other workers??? Besides, didn't we know all this before we joined in 2003? Five years later and three and a half months before the deadline we are still struggling.
l Galea
Sep 18th 2008, 15:57
@N.Azzopardi
The people were promised heaven on earth if they joined the eu, but they are all finding that it is hell on earth.
The referendum result was based on mass deceit and treachery, both by the Nationalist Party and the eu itself.
As for politicians and their acceptance of the referendum, may I remind you that we do not have politicians but dermocrants.
If they were real politicians who have our future at heart and who have the proverbial balls they would have sent the eu to hell and declared our independence and freedom of the eu yoke or at least call for a referendum to see whether the people want to continue in this eu colonial slavery and dictated to by unelected petty dictators.
Charles Camilleri
Sep 18th 2008, 15:56
What is all this fuss about. What Brussels is saying is that Malta Drydocks is bankrupt and like other companies in similar situation has to close down. A billion Euros from the taxpayer did not succeed to make the company viable. Many private companies have closed down because of bankruptcy and nothing has been heard about them. Why should the Dryodocks' workers be preferred because the company is Govt owned. Brussels is telling to play by the rules of the game and no preferences please. And that's how it should be.
P Borg
Sep 18th 2008, 15:43
I can't but notice why any of the people administering this country (both in government and in opposition) have failed to come up with my following solution to this problem!
1. Government is shareholder in the company. Surely, government will not be intruded upon for capitalising the loans in its company (instead of writing them off - which is against EU legislation). This is normal practice in the business world.
2. Government sells all the shares (including the new shares), which practically have no value, as originally planned.
Alexander Morana
Sep 18th 2008, 15:25
@ Mr. Charles Busutill, oh come on now why spoil the fun. You go ahead and take your Mrs. too, and don't forget the flags and celebrate our charades. Wasn't always the PN's attitude towards national calamities? Damn the storms. Damn the torpedoes. Damn the reef, ship ahead. Tax and spend like a bunch of drunkard sailors and come what may!
Now the ship has hit the rocks.
Joseph Bonello
Sep 18th 2008, 15:15
@ A. Zammit - oops ! that was a lapsus - of course we are talking of Malta Shipyards ! Why all this fake crying ? The rules of the game were known prior to joining the EU, we surely joined in a democratic way : we voted for it, and the Accession Treaty was ratified by the Maltese Parliament (by consensus).
Denis Catania
Sep 18th 2008, 14:49
@N.Azzopardi: Hey good idea, why don't we blame it on Mintoff, thats the ticket, it's Mintoffs fault.
Our party had 20 years to fix anything Mintoff did. Why didn't we?
C. Muscat
Sep 18th 2008, 14:45
Very well said N. Azzopardi. The Malta Shipyard came back from the dead to haunt the people reponsable for the millions of euros of tax payers money. It is fair to say that shipyard workers should foot the bill of 100 million euros, pack up and go. Well done Brussels.
N.Azzopardi
Sep 18th 2008, 13:22
.Philip Pace
I think you weren't in Malta for many years. The losses that MDD accumulated weren't from recent years. They have been coming from Montoff's time. You don't remember the Dom in those days when MDDwas given to its workers and all raised their hands in appreciation. Dom knew in those days that there was no chance that this enterprise survives. Good to mention the 9 months strike before the Dom goverment. All those involved in MDD being admin or labour should be ashamed of themselves, putting the general Maltese public in such a position, and the taxpayer to pay so much. Now thanks to the EU we shall get rid of an enterprise which have been death for many, many years. Don't blame the PN or EU, but blame yourselves dear MDD circus.
N.Azzopardi
Sep 18th 2008, 13:22
@ I. Galea
You are forgetting that joining the EU was through a referendum with a majority of votes. So you have just to sit and abide with the EU rules, no matter what you say. we are not going out of the EU and now even that Dr. Joseph Muscat saw the majority of the Maltese were right when they voted yes.
Alexander Brincat
Sep 18th 2008, 13:21
It looks like the European Union wants to take matters in its own hands. However please let us remind the commission that Malta is a sovereign state within the EU but nevertheless upon accession we have accepted certain terms and conditions. To which we MUST abide. However until all is proven wrong and there is an absolute certainty that the 'yards will not recover, then the fight to save it goes on. This has been the stand taken by the government and labour. The government wants the best deal. Labour wants things done in the national interest. Al least there is convergence on the goals to be achieved. Can't we give the government some time to examine the expressions of interest and possibly a deal; a good one? I am very sorry but the European Commission cannot force Malta to accept its wishes unconditionally. Our condition is that we try and see how it goes. After all hope is the last to die, isn't it? Once a deal is struck we can be sure that all incompetence and ineficiencies would be eliminated from the 'yards structure. And the story goes on.
Chris Borg
Sep 18th 2008, 13:15
Heil Nellie!!!
Back to the future.....
Now, either this govt. of ours is utterly incompetent + a lackey or otherwise this was all planned from the beggining...after all PN didn't have much love lost for shipyard workers....
A.Zammit
Sep 18th 2008, 12:55
Dear Mr. Joseph Bonello.
If you are going to comment on this article the least you can do is get your facts right!
Malta Shipbuilding ceased to exist several years ago; you actually do not even know which company you are talking about let alone the issues and consequences related to the closure of Malta Shipyards.
The fact that you state that the EU should protect Maltese citizens against decisions made by their own democratically elected government defies comprehension!
You are instigating that Malta is the equivalent to some third world country where citizens need to be protected from dictatorial governments which do not have their nations interest at heart.
Think again Mr.Bonello, our government is democratic and legal!!!
Anthony Farrugia
Sep 18th 2008, 12:50
@ I Abela : I agree with your three scenarios - ultimately the euro 100 M debt will have to be written off by Government ie. us - but at least this would be the end of the black hole down which the Maltese oeople have been pouring millions for the past 50 years since Bailey's time.
Silvio Berlusconi first scuppered the Alitalia merger with Air France for political reasons before the Italian elecions; then after the elections his government gave Alitalia, which has been bankrupt for several years, a massive loan to pay wages, fuel etc. He then put together a consortium of cronies (the "Cordata Italiana) to take over Alitalia at fire sale price whilst fiddling with legislation to try and stave off bankruptcy. What is the EU's position on this tragic comedy? Where is Neelie Kroes?
We should take a leaf out of Silvio's book and carry on with privatisation regardless of the EU's rantings. After all, besides platitudes, what tangible help have we received about illegal immigration ? A lot of hot air about "burden sharing" and "Frontex" (some help this has been!)
What can the EU do to us? Put us in the corner?!!
J Martinelli
Sep 18th 2008, 12:29
What Brussels is asking is just a technicality and declaring the Shipyard bankrupt will eliminate the sticky problem of writing off the 100 million. When a company is declared bankrupt, the creditors are automatically stuck with what they are owed and by necessity the amount owed is written off. Their only hope is some recovery from the disposal of the assets.
Whether the government sticks to its plans or declare the shipyards bankrupt makes little difference if any to any remaining workers or for those who chose, wisely, to accept the early retirement terms offered by the government and the GWU.
Any offers by outside investors will be net offers devoid of further negotiations regarding outstanding debts, number of workers to be retained and other financial complications associated with buying an ongoing business.
The decades long struggle by the shipyards will then be thankfully over.
Dr. John Zammit
Sep 18th 2008, 12:28
The Maltese Parliament, the Prime Minister and Ministers and all the Maltese Parliamentarians are nothing, they have no authority. They are just a local council with no power. That is why I insist that the Maltese Members of the European Parliament should be in all the groups, especially in the EPP (PN), the PES (MLP), the ALDE/ELDR (Alleanza Liberali) and the Greens (Alternattiva Demokratika) to have more say and lobby in the main four political groups for support to Malta. If we are not going to learn and remain with the old political system by electing only PN and MLP it is going to be hopeless.
l Galea
Sep 18th 2008, 12:01
A despicable diktat by an unelected EU petty dictator dermocrant.
So much for independence, freedom and sovereignty.
Those who want the Shipyard closed are only seeing up to their noses and clearly show the venom perpetrated by the Nationalist Party during the seventies and eighties against the Shipyard workers.
Where is the Church now to speak against the EU's dictatorial decisions and support the Maltese workers, Government and Opposition at all costs against the EU?
Let's get together and get out of the EU because everything that we had and that we may still have is being destroyed by the EU petty dictators or given to foreigners.
This is apart from foreign workers and illegal immigrants coming to OUR country and destroying the Maltese workers wages and working conditions and also apart from the future clashes between the illegal immigrants and the Maltese citizens and the social upheaval which the foreign workers and illegal immigrants are causing and will continue to cause to Maltese society as long as they are allowed to stay in Malta.
Maltese workers unite.
You have nothing to lose but the EU yoke and chains which have shackled you.
Anthony Borg
Sep 18th 2008, 11:45
Using the same rational as the EU is using with the Malta Dry Docks, then why not shut down Alitalia. The italians are trying to privatise it and they are subsidising the airline to the tune of millions of Euros. I believe since 1999 in fact.
But more then likely the comment by Nigel Lawrence is closer to the truth. The goverment negotiated the entry to the EU and have MEPs, so they must have known the rules surely. If not then its organised incompetence!
Joseph Bonello
Sep 18th 2008, 11:43
if all those lamenting our 'loss of independence' want to keep paying money to keep Malta Shipbuilding running - perhaps they can start a fund themselves. I am very glad that the EU is protecting the Maltese taxpayer by not allowing our government to subsidize further this loss maker. Isn't $1billion enough ?
Joseph Mangani
Sep 18th 2008, 11:36
Is Ms Kroes certain whether there was any STATE AID in the privatisation process of ALITALIA? if there was not any, whatever happened to the millions on millions in debt accumulated by that so efficient airline? What's good fo the goose is good for the gander..or if not, the Commission is turning the EU into another Orwellian animal farm.
P.Schembri
Sep 18th 2008, 11:29
VIVA L-INDIPENDENZA!!! Why not make Independence Day our only National Holiday???? We're no longer the master of our country. Long Live Brussels
Charles Busuttil
Sep 18th 2008, 11:20
So much for celebrating Independence Day next Sunday and come next 13th December, Republic Day.
philip pace
Sep 18th 2008, 11:01
Without entering the political village arena between the blues and the reds as that is a very negative attitude, this situation is not adding up.
The Maltese who voted in favour of Malta's entry to the EU should have realised that from the accession to the EU, important matters like this would surface and the EU is very rigid about this. These voters should have been wiser but.......
The idea that it was the workers' fault on the €100 debt doesn't tally up.
If so many people sat on the management then most probably wrong decisions were taken.
The Government has put the donkey before the cart and the same Government cannot pass this debt on to the Maltese citizens.
The Government should explain to the citizens on how this debt accumulated to €100, why it had been left to reach such a sum;what caused it to rise so much; how did the management do the planning; was this planning viable and the list gets longer.
The Polish situation was clear for more than 8 years ago. It was illegal.
Unfortunately we have to comply by EU rules and sadly that is a fact.
Nigel Lawrence
Sep 18th 2008, 11:01
Falling neatly in to the PN plan. Kill of the drydcoks- which it has always despised- then hand over the real estate, for a pittance, to it's friends in the construction biz. Just watch.
I Sammut
Sep 18th 2008, 10:59
The Commission is perfectly right. Thanks for doing us a favour and to save our money. Is it a right that when one's job is no longer needed the state has to pay compensation? I have never heard of such right and it would be a shame if the workers involved are more equal than others. Money should be used to help these workers train more so that they can work in the interest of the country and not simply get compensation. Funds should be used to attract new projects such as Smart City and not to sustain an irrelavant industry in today's realities.
T Camilleri
Sep 18th 2008, 10:40
One thing is certain...we no longer have the right to manage this country.
I Abela
Sep 18th 2008, 10:31
Unfortunately Ms. Kroes is misinterpreting the rules. State Aid is illegal .... but Ms Kroes is ignoring the fact that the government is also the owner ie. the major shareholder. If the government writes off the 100 Million, the coffers would be 100 Million short. But if the government declares the shipyard bankrupt.....the coffers would STILL be 100 Million short. If the government decides to leave the debt there and still privatise the shipyards, obviously the new owner would lower the bid for the contract, ..... therefore the coffers would AGAIN be 100 Million short. I really can't understand Ms. Kroes point apart from dismissing all employees with any compensation.
A. Zammit
Sep 18th 2008, 10:01
I would like to move a proposal that this country does not need to finance incompetent local politicians nor does it need a Maltese elected parliament.
With immediate effect, the running of the Island should be taken over by a ‘Council of Administration’ appointed by Brussels.