• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

More digging beneath St John's is utter madness for restorer

Sante Guido, an Italian restorer who has been working on the restoration of St John's Co-Cathedral for some 12 years, thinks it would be "utter madness" to further excavate the area beneath the cathedral in Valletta in order to open a museum.

Having personally visited the vast underground area beneath the cathedral, occupied by a number of relatively dry cisterns, Prof. Guido, from the firm Sante Guido Restauro e Conservazione di Opere d'Arte, however, feels it was a pity for such a space - which is testimony to Malta's cultural heritage - to remain unutilised.

Prof. Guido, together with his colleague Giuseppe Mantella, said that although they have been working on the various restoration projects in the co-cathedral for years, the Foundation of St John's "never" consulted them in any way with regard to the proposed museum extension project.

In an interview with The Times, the Italian restorers and editors of a lavish new publication tracing the restoration projects of St John's Co-Cathedral financed through the Italian-Maltese protocol, highlighted the multifaceted projects entrusted to them.

Their book is titled Storie Di Restauri Nella Chiesa Conventuale Di San Giovanni Battista A La Valletta: La Cappella Di Santa Caterina Della Lingua D'Italia E Le Committenze Del Gran Maestro Gregorio Carafa.

Through the extensive research conducted, a number of interesting facts have been unearthed. Vital information has been discovered about the methods adopted by Mattia Preti for the decoration of the vault of St John's Cathedral. It was presumed that Preti had a number of assistants and scalpellini (stone-cutters) working with him. However, until the relevant documentation was discovered, this was mere speculation and not fact.

Their work also revealed that, as early as the project-proposal of the vault, Preti was aware that he would be using oils on the surface and not the more customary fresco technique. This has been certified through a document in which Preti specified that he required 300 litres of linseed oil before commencing the project. Documents pertinent to the costs and timeframes of the project are also included in the new publication.

This book, together with a collection of documents published in 2005 by archivist John Debono, Art And Artisans In St John's And Other Churches In The Maltese Islands, ca. 1650-1800: Stone Carving, Marble, Bells, Clocks And Organs, sheds further light on the work methods of Il Calabrese (as Preti is also known).

Another important aspect was the revelation that the "white patches" on the walls of the cathedral, previously thought to have been caused by calcium, were due to high levels of nitrates (salt) brought about through the rising humidity and through the decomposition of flesh from the corpses buried below the temple's floor. Prof. Guido and Mr Mantella said that the humidity was also due to the levels of condensation resulting from the high influx of visitors.

Asked to comment on future rehabilitation aspects and embellishment projects for Valletta, Prof. Guido said he would like to see the old Opera House reconstructed as it was originally; Pjazza San Ġorġ ought to be restored to how it once was - complete with the Neptune fountain, part of it now located at the Grandmaster's Palace courtyard and another part at the Argotti Gardens, in Floriana; and for the underground cisterns beneath Valletta to be restored and developed constructively.

Prof. Guido also mentioned a few upcoming projects he is working on. He wishes to restore 10 of Preti's key paintings found in Malta in order to take them abroad for a major exhibition. He feels the final selection of works would showcase and represent Preti's artistic accomplishments in Malta.

Another exhibition is scheduled to take place in Rome highlighting Maltese sculptor Melchiorre Gafà.

The book by Prof. Guido and Mr Mantella is available for purchase online from www.midseabooks.com or by contacting the publishers at admin@midseabooks.com.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Raymond Sammut (on 18/9/08)
@ Astrid Vella

"It is a pity that someone with Sante Guido's years of experience in restoring St. John's has not been consulted ... "

Would MEPA be questioning the applicant, namely, the Foundation, for the lack of consultation?

One would expect that MEPA would have it as part of its procedure to question the applicant in this regard. It would be inappropriate if it didn't. This is national heritage on a large scale which is at stake. It could very well be destroyed or altered beyond recognition in the interest of the few and against the interest of the Maltese public.
James A. Tyrrell (on 17/9/08)
@John Dimech, I agree with Franco Farrugia .... If you think for one minute that a professional restorer is saying that he thinks it would be a good idea to display priceless tapesteries in the cisterns...........
Astrid Vella (on 17/9/08)
Mr. Dimech, understanding the project can only come through studying the plans which we have done several times over. I cannot understand how Foundation representatives can claim that no excavation is to be carried out under St. John's, when the plans clearly show new corridors running under St. John's which have to be excavated to link the crypt to the new underground galleries. The plans also show lift shafts to be sunk down to basement level. Maybe the Foundation reps don't know the details of the plans? This is not the first instance of erroneous information being given by the Foundation, whose architect also wrongly claimed that the post-war structures are not scheduled.

As Adrian Cardona correctly pointed out, Sante Guido is distinguishing between the existing old cisterns (water reservoirs) and the huge new galleries to be excavated to a depth of about 4 storeys underground.

It is a pity that someone with Sante Guido's years of experience in restoring St. John's has not been consulted every inch of the way,but not surprising, since a previous restoration architect was dropped due to his opposition to the project.Again it makes one wonder how thoroughly the project has been studied.
John Dimech (on 17/9/08)
@ Mr Franco Farrugia. Who knows. Maybe you have problems in comprehension. Maybe your understanding of the article is based on what you want to understand. Maybe you have arrived at the wrong conclusion. Perhaps you added 1+1 and have concluded that the total sum is equal to 11...
Franco Farrugia (on 17/9/08)
@ Mr John Dimech - I think you have problems in comprehension, if you try to make yourself believe that what Sante Guido is saying is the same as what the Foundation wants!!!!
John Dimech (on 17/9/08)
Prof Guido was quoted as saying that it would be madness to propose excavating the Co-cathedral. If one reads well what the Foundation for St John's Co-Cathedral has been saying one can easily conclude that the Foundation agrees with Prof Guido - the Foundation has NEVER proposed excavating the Co-Cathedral. Prof Guido also said that he belives that the cisterns underneath the Co-Cathedral should be used. I went through what the Foundation has been proposing and guess what I have just read? - yes the Foundation is proposing utlising the cisterns...I am getting the impression that Prof Guido and the Foundation are in actual terms in agreement !!!!!!
Sergio Galea Vincenti (on 17/9/08)
Incredible... and now let's wait for the Foundation's lawyer to reply to this article containing an expert's views and hope some real soul-searching by the Foundation's committee takes place! I hope that someone from the Foundation replies now as to whom the Foundation actually consulted on the proposed project!
Adrian Cardona (on 17/9/08)
I think what Mr Sante Guido is saying is that the proposed museum should occupy the already existing cisterns, rather than excavate further and destroying them.
Andrew Azzopardi (on 17/9/08)
This is unbelievable! Last Sunday, a newspaper (not The Sunday Times) ran a front-page item written by its editor entitled 'Unexpected support for underground museum at St John’s'. Sante Guido was quoted as saying 'So why not turn the cisterns into museums [...] and thus provide a far better space for their exhibition than the present cramped quarters?'
The other 'supporter' is the Italian ambassador, according to the newspaper.
An explanation (and apology from whoever got it wrong) is very much in order.

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku