Evoking a siege mentality among Sengleans
I would like to make some comments about the Heritage Trail that was publicised in The Times (September 5) under the title Siege Mentality. This title can also be applied to the people of Senglea (Sengleans), noting the path to be followed during this Great Siege Heritage Trail. The term siege mentality may be given a dual meaning, and, in this case, I am referring to the siege mentality that the trail may evoke among the Sengleans.
The fact that Senglea has been omitted demonstrates a downsizing scenario of the importance and share that this city had in the Great Siege.
The trail starts from Valletta and ends in Vittoriosa. It is sad and disappointing that such a trail, organised by Heritage Malta, does not include the important cities that were involved during the siege. I am no historian but this trail raises a number of questions with regard to the siege and Senglea because this city, according to a number of sources, had an important share in the siege. What were the criteria used to include the stations of the trail? Why was Senglea omitted from this trail?
If one surfs the net for some information about this subject, two web pages are likely to be encountered. These are the websites of the city's local council (www.islalocalcouncil.com/historicalinfo.htm) and that called Storia Libera (www.storialibera.it). The first site features an article with the title After My Struggle I Emerged Undefeated (Quo Pugna Vi Invicta Consido) and posted in the second are, among others, two frescoes by Matteo Perez d'Aleccio which depict The Siege of Senglea - June 28, 1565 and The Assault on Senglea - July 15, 1565 respectively. The irony is that this trail will start with a talk on the frescoes of D'Aleccio that are found in the Palace within the Grandmaster's State Rooms.
I do hope that in organising historical events the real facts are recounted as they have occurred, with the important elements being given their real value in terms of importance.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Vv.Pulis
Sep 15th 2008, 20:45
While I agree with Christopher Cousin's disappointment concerning the total elimination of Senglea from the so called Great Siege Heritage tour since I am also a Senglean, I cannot let Mr.Ronnie Gauci's comments go unanswered. For accuracy's sake Birgu along with Senglea was heavily attacked during the siege albeit not as savagely as the latter Senglea being the weaker of the two. The turks reserved their heaviest bombardments and assaults for Senglea. The attacks used to be launched on both cities simultaneously in order to prevent them from aiding each other with twice the number of troops assaulting the Senglea bastions.Furthermore, Senglea was the only city to suffer a seaborne assault and this is the part that the persons who went on the toured missed out on. The assault occured on the side of Senglea facing Corradino which is not visible from Vittoriosa. The best place to see where this attack happened would have been the Gardjola Garden on Senglea Point. but for some unkmnown reason Heritage Malta seems to have overlooked this important detail.Pity.
Ronnie Gauci
Sep 15th 2008, 17:16
This is a shame! As if Senglea had nothing to do with the 1565 Siege. The most crucial battles in the Great Siege were fought in Fort St. Elmo (Valletta) and Fort St. Michael (Senglea). Vittoriosa just contained the Knights' palaces, warehouses, brothels and some cannons on Fort St.Angelo.
Vittoriosa is the victorious city while Senglea is the unconquered one, but if Senglea was conquered then Vittoriosa would have fallen in Turkish hands in a matter of minutes but thank God those inside Fort St. Michael had other plans and thanks to them today Turkish is not our official language. No wonder that Victory Day is celebrated only in Senglea in this area.
Heritage Malta should be ashamed for this.