
Wednesday, 3rd September 2008 - 14:25CET
Video: Enforcement officers strike - twice!
Enforcement officers struck again at the Sliema Strand this afternoon, removing chairs, tables and planters at Costa Cafe after finding that permit conditions had been exceeded. They also removed a 20cm high platform the owner had built.
Neighbours had complained that access to their property had been hindered by the street furniture.
A spokesman for the Parliamentary Secretariat responsible for Lands said this was the second time that this cafe' was the subject of enforcement action. The first was on June 13.
The department, the spokesman said, would not tolerate violation of the law and such enforcement action would continue.
Residents thanked the council, the police and the Lands Department for taking action.




RSS
Comments
Last time I went to Ghadira Bay at 8.00am, the beach were scarcely of people But sunbeds and umbrellas were placed from the front of the beach with another 3 rows leaving no place for people who did not want to hire a sunbed or umbrella.
They should force law on these too.
What is amazing is that the Enforcement officers at MEPA, MTA and others should do there job properly as they are being paid by us the Tax payers and not wait for the residents to report each and every case.
I wish the Prime Minister takes immediate action to re organise these authorities to be more accountable and transparent.
To make matters worse, most bars close down and leave the wide pavement there, which is then turned in to a lost parking space!
When people come to Bugibba, and the locals go out, we then return late at night finding no where to park, and Mr. Warden does make a good fortune out of us the next morning!
Mr Camilleri, first of all pavements are meant to be used by pedestrians to walk safely on, not to be used by restaurants and cafe's to serve patrons on.
Furthermore, to add insult to injury, they not only put their tables and chairs outside, but exceed many times their allocation.
Such permits should be stopped by the authorities.
What if someone has an accident when the restaurant or cafe owners are within their permits limit and sues the Government for damages?
Also as indicated by other respondents, all beach concessions should also be stopped as beaches are public property to be enjoyed by the public not for private persons to make a profit from.
Moreover, I agree with Mr Casingena.
Have the health authorities ever checked what risks are patrons running when eating and drinking with all the pollution of the traffic going by?
I see you're back with your pathetic comments as always. Do you really need to question EVERYTHING that happens on a daily basis? Just sit back and enjoy the show! As for the eightees, well I'd suggest you let them rot away and have a forward-looking approach. What on earth does the timing of an election have to do with law enforcement? Get a life mate!
Now that you've got me wondering...why did the cow cross the road?
Letting days pass might be taken as if the authorities are lenient, hence abuses.
By the way.. how come these restaurants are being allowed to use the pavement for their business? How come a bar/restaurant licences for 20 persons is left to utilise the pavement to serve 60 persons? is MTA recovering the difference in the licence? and what about the health authority? is it hygienic to eat in these locations?..
Later I sent an email to the MTA about the infringement quoting the relevant section from a goverment legal document, covering pavement encroachment - but nothing was done of course.
Today you still have to weave through the tables and chairs where people are eating in front of these places - is someone being paid to 'look the other way' I wonder?
Do you really honestly truly think that back in the dark ages of the eighties the law enforcement was carried out this way? Have you forgot the special police with battons and masks covering their faces while enforcing the law on inncoent civilians?
In the eighties contraventions were not related to table and chairs but to other more serious issues which it would be better not to mention hear because the Times editor might get a nightmare while asleep. The state of enforcement was a far cry from the one carried out today.
As for you question re the timing the answer is simple. If the goverment acted this way pre-election we would have heard the opposition making statments regarding extending the zone for the owners to put more tables and chairs and so trying to win a couple of votes.
“UNUSED DECKCHAIRS AND UMBRELLAS ON BEACHES MUST FOLLOW!!!”
They are scandalously set there permanently!!! THE BEACHES SHOULD BE PUBLIC!!!
So, why exactly was all this never done prior to the election?
Will it be sustained?
Why was it that when the law was enforced in the eighties, it was considered to be heavy-handed?
Such owners should be made to pay all the expenses connected with the removal of the furniture, the furniture confiscated in favour of the Government, and a hefty fine equivalent to their declared income for six months or a year.
They should also be closed down after each offence, first time for six months, second time for a year and third time forever and the owner never allowed to operate in the same type of business, even if through a company.
If the owner or his relatives hold any shares then the company should also not be allowed to operate in the sector.
That will teach these cowboys.
A case in point was last Sunday evening. My wife and I could not even go through the mass of tables and chairs with my son's push chair while we were walking in the area. According to their permit they are suppose to leave a passage of 1.50m. What if a disabled person had to go through? He would obviosly had to go of the pavment and bypass the tables and chairs through the road, as my wife and I had to do, with the obvious risks.
Pavments are public property and should remain so. Allocations for tables and chairs on pavments should be respected by the cafe's owners. If not then action has to be taken as we saw today.
Again well done to all involved.
Revoke the license permanently and more importantly make sure they FOLLOW the law!!
What about the 'bill board type' vans and trucks occupying daily the parking space in Msida around the GWU Monument in front of the Church. These vans, hired on purpose display bill boards for parties, concerts etc., Is there any Law which concerns these infrigments
In Gozo the authorities were still boarding the ferry back to Malta when more furniture came out