• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Controversial residents' parking schemes in line with EU laws

Residents' parking schemes anger visiting motorists. Photo: Ray Attard

Complainants opposed to the controversial residential parking schemes, which are making it increasingly difficult for non-residents to find parking spaces, have no redress under EU regulations.

Nationalist MEP Simon Busuttil told The Sunday Times yesterday that although EU law includes a principle of non-discrimination, this mainly applied to discrepancies between nationalities.

On Thursday, government defended residents' parking schemes that have sprouted in a number of localities around Malta, saying that these were legal as long as they were approved by the Transport Authority (ADT).

Since many drivers end up paying fines for parking their cars in residents' spaces, they have questioned whether such schemes are discriminatory since they differentiate between residents of different localities.

The Transport Ministry also insisted that the schemes are not discriminatory under EU law.

"Residents of busy urban centres all over Europe benefit from these schemes, which are necessary for people to enjoy their own property," a ministry spokesman said.

He said that Malta's car ownership rate was such that there was tough competition for parking spaces. "Residential parking schemes do not solve this fundamental problem. They ease it. The solutions are in changes to people's behaviour with less car dependence, more car sharing and more use of public transport," he explained.

Asked whether residential parking discriminated against residents who lived in areas where such schemes did not exist, the ministry spokesman said different localities had different needs.

"Nobody can be more sensitive to these different needs than local councils who live them every day. The ADT's role is to ensure fairness and to regulate the policies to govern these schemes so that they do not only take the residents' point of view, but also consider the wider picture. That is why there can be no single national law for identical schemes everywhere and anywhere," he pointed out.

This view was echoed by Michael Cohen, president of the Local Councils' Association. Mr Cohen said he would not dream of introducing such a scheme in Kalkara, where he is the mayor, because this was simply not needed, while neighbouring Vittoriosa needed residential parking because locals were finding it difficult to find parking spaces.

Valletta mayor Alexei Dingli believes it is important to respect both the needs of residents and visitors, adding that the council regularly receives complaints from residents who do not find a parking place despite the scheme being in operation.

The capital has around 450 reserved parking spots, around 40 of which are reserved throughout the day. But according to the mayor, not even Valletta's 3,000-odd parking spots are enough for locals' needs. He explained that there are some 3,000 families living in the capital city, some owning more than one car, and there are very few garages.

"We have to strike a balance between respecting residents' needs and those who visit Valletta," he said.

Residents' parking schemes are also present in Victoria, Fontana, Mellieħa, Pietà, Ħamrun, San Ġwann, St Paul's Bay, Floriana, Mosta, Sliema, Iklin, Swieqi, Msida, St Julian's, Naxxar, Sta Venera, Balzan, Vittoriosa and Ta' Xbiex.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Keith Farrugia (on 1/9/08)
I do not agree with reserved residential parking, for two reasons. Firstly, residents during the day should be out at their work destinations, therefore I cannot but realise that during most part of the day the reserved residential parking would be empty except for a few odd cars whilst all people working in offices within the area are forced to parked hundreds of meters away.

Secondly I know people who spent in the region of 20-40 thousand Euros to purchase a garage if they truly wanted to "enjoy their property". So why should the council of another area grant such free benefits? Do residents pay specific council tax? The answer is NO!, so just as I paid the same amount of road tax, I should be free to park whereever I like on Maltese roads. This situation is simply becoming ridiculous - I stoped entering Valletta ever since the parking scheme was introduced - will this situation happen to other commercial areas?
J Farrugia (on 1/9/08)
These parking schemes need a thorough re-thinking since (a) every one is equal and no discrimination of locality is to be allowed; (b) each one of us pays taxes because after all we all hail from a small country called Malta and (c) there is a need to cater for both the residents as well as the consumer of services and products. The government needs to find a system which can satisfy both parties since all have their good reasons of opposing the schemes as they are at present.
Eugenio Taliana (on 31/8/08)
I believe that roads belong to the public, and not to any single resident in particular, therefore, if there are reserved parking spaces, residents should pay for them as we pay our road licence to use the roads . . . why not?
EUGENE BORG (on 31/8/08)
WE HOPE THAT THE NEW STA VENERA MAYOR IS NOW CONCIOUS OF THIS UPDATE AND RELIEF US FROM THE CONGESTIONS AND LACK OF PARKING SPACE FOR RESIDENTS IN THE NEW SUPERMARKET AREA IN STA VENERA. RESIDENTS AGREE TO THE PARKING RESTRICTION SCHEME AND THEREFORE WE AWAIT CONCRETE DECISIONS IN THIS REGARD.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku