• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Demolition near Lija Belvedere starts

Demolition works in progress in Lija yesterday, close to the landmark Belvedere. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli

The developers behind the apartment block which neighbours the landmark Lija Belvedere started demolition works on their site despite the fact that the Malta Environment and Planning Authority scheduled the area last month, hoping to block the controversial project.

The architect responsible for the project, Robert Musumeci insists that his clients have a right to go ahead with the development given that they have a permit and no discontinuance order was issued.

The entire length of the main avenue in the town's centre and the neighbouring Villa Gourgion were listed in June in a move which, Mepa hoped, would block the development, located less than 20 metres from the Belvedere.

Asked yesterday for the authority's position on the matter, Mepa chairman Austin Walker acknowledged that the developers could act on their permit, which was issued amid a storm of controversy last year.

He also pointed out, however, that the board would be deciding on how to revoke the permit at the next hearing, which is scheduled for next Thursday.

"We will be deciding whether to revoke the permit through article 45 or article 46 (of the Development Planning Act) but I cannot comment further on this," he said.

The decision to proceed with one article as opposed to the other could make all the difference as the law clearly stipulates that when a permit is revoked through Article 45, the developers will be entitled to compensation, which in this case can run unto hundreds of thousands of euros.

Article 46, on the other hand, deals with conservation orders which are usually issued to conserve properties of some heritage value, which is not the case of the villa which has been developed.

When contacted yesterday, Mr Musumeci said that the scheduling of the street limiting the area to two floors (despite the Local Plan stating otherwise) is already in force which means that there is no scope for discussing conservation orders in terms of article 46 at this late stage.

"The building per se is a typical masonry and concrete structure with no remains of geological, palaeontological, cultural, archaeological, architectural, historical, antiquarian or artistic importance, or ecological or scientific value, and which merits its own conservation, he said."

The discussion, he insisted, should be limited solely to Article 45, which will mean that a discontinuance order will be issued.

"In other words, the Mepa board has to decide whether works should resume since the permit preceded the scheduling or otherwise works should be halted as soon as a discontinuance order is issued."

The architect would not comment further on the matter yesterday. However, he had said last July that his clients would be seeking compensation.

The project - a block of eight flats and a penthouse on four floors, complete with underlying garages - would replace a villa and its garden which have now been pulled down.

Asked for an estimate of what his clients would deem to be fair compensation, he had said: "I cannot give you a figure because I haven't done the costing, but we're talking big money."

Essentially the developers are expected to ask to be compensated for the revenue they would have netted had they gone ahead with the project, which was set in one of Malta's more upmarket residential areas. Residents and Lija council, led by the mayor Ian Castaldi Paris had objected strongly to the development, presenting a petition signed by 143 people.

When the permit was issued last September, the authority was of an altogether different mindset. While noting the arguments against the project and the effect the development would have on the Belvedere, Mepa's case officer still recommended its approval.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Lewis Balzan (on 30/8/08)
And why is FAA keeping so silent on this atrocity? Wake up Astrid, the Lija people need you. This is by far worse than some of the cases you so vehemently condemned in the past.
Ivan Scicluna (on 29/8/08)
Thank-you perit Robert Musumeci ! I am ashamed to have the same nationality as people like you.
I. M. Dingli (on 29/8/08)
This project will definitely go on. A magistrate is reportedly owner of one of the apartments. It is thus unlikely that the permit will be revoked!! Very nice indeed.
Alexander Cortis (on 29/8/08)
That's the spirit!
Keep demolishing attractive buildings and build monstrosities instead.
One day someone in authority will realise how unattractive, downight ugly, Malta has become.
Well done! Keep it up! When the tourists stop coming because there are more attractive resorts and countries to go to, what will the Maltese do? Well, they could always emigrate to another country and leave the island to the politicians and speculators to lay down the last bit of concrete to cover up the last bit of countryside (what's that?) there is!
mario mifsud (on 29/8/08)
hello ... gonzi pn are you awake !
what ever next after the episodes prison break, the tower of babylon, jpo in tears and more
the whole country and its institutions have bocome a national and institutional farce
Simon Joseph Aquilina (on 29/8/08)
The government should realize the mistakes that have been going in this country and start trying to find a remedy. At Hal-Lija only there are already two cases where MEPA has shamefully given to permission without giving any weight to the surroundings. The Government should open an enquiry to see in which light these permissions have been given and if there were any inconsistencies. This is the Government responsibility and that of all the other political parties. These political parties should remember that the people are not only there when the Elections come. We are here all the time!
Simon Joseph Aquilina (on 29/8/08)
If the Mepa's case officer did not to take into consideration the historical and emotional value of the Lija Tower then he should be held responsible.

We have a high concentration of historical buildings in our country and we do not care about it. The UK have Stonehenge and they make a big fuss about it, we have several temples and most of them are falling apart! This the same scenario just in a different place. Some day, Some one will have to take the hard decision to put everything in place! Only when that day will come can we say that the majority of the Malta have had justice!
J Farrugia (on 29/8/08)
MEPA is still playing games. article 45 or 46, MY foot! No compensation should be handed out to no one. Just revoke the permits and that is that. Otherwise use the power of the law: Requisition for possession and use. With those who want to play rough, let's do the same.
Simon farrugia (on 29/8/08)
I have a dream…MEPA revoke the building permit, developers get compensation (I love it when our TAX money goes down the tubes like that) and the Lija council end up with a pile of rubble. (Apologies to Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s on the 45th anniversary of his inspirational "I have a dream" speech)
Lewis Balzan (on 29/8/08)
U Flimkien Kollox Possibli. And who cares what the Lija residents and their mayor think? It's their votes that count and the election is still some 5 light years away, anyway.
joe Scerri (on 29/8/08)
What a complete farce. Banana republic at its best. Mepa reform, haha.

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku