
Thursday, 28th August 2008 - 12:43CET
Pope angry over crucified green frog sculpture
A modern art sculpture portraying a crucified green frog holding a beer mug and an egg that Pope Benedict has condemned as blasphemous may have its days numbered.
The board of the Museion museum in the northern city of Bolzano are meeting today to choose whether to side with the Pope and other opponents of the frog or with proponents who say it should be defended as a work of art.
The wooden sculpture by the late German artist Martin Kippenberger depicts a frog about 1 metre 30 cm high nailed to brown cross and holding a beer mug in one outstretched hand and an egg in another.
Called "Zuerst die Fuesse," (Feet First), it wears a green loin cloth and is nailed through the hands and the feet in the manner of Jesus Christ. Its green tongue hangs out of its mouth.
Kippenberger's work has been shown at the Tate Modern and the Saatchi Gallery in London and at the Venice Biennale, and retrospectives are planned in Los Angeles and New York.
Museum officials in the northern bi-lingual Alto Adige region near the Austrian border said the artist, who died in 1997, considered it a self-portrait illustrating human angst.
Pope Benedict, who is German himself and was recently on holiday not far from Bolzano, obviously did not agree.
The Vatican wrote a letter of support in the Pope's name to Franz Pahl, president of the regional government who opposed the sculpture.
"Surely this is not a work of art but a blashphemy and a disgusting piece of trash that upsets many people," Mr Pahl told Reuters by telephone as the museum board was meeting.
The Vatican letter said that the work "wounds the religious sentiments of so many people who see in the cross the symbol of God's love".
Mr Pahl, whose province is heavily Catholic, was so outraged by the sculpture of the pop-eyed amphibian that he went on a hunger strike to demand its removal and had to be taken to hospital during the summer.
The museum then moved the statue out of its foyer and into a less trafficked area on the third floor.
But Mr Pahl's opposition was unflagging and he has threatened to resign as regional president unless it is removed altogether.
Art experts defend the work.
"Art must always be free and the artist should not have any restrictions on freedom of expression," Claudio Strinati, a superindendent for Rome's state museums, told an Italian newspaper.







RSS
Comments
you get disgusted because somebody depicts a frog on cross, i get disgusted by church ministers represeting church abusing children, should i say lets destroy them? is that not more a serious issue. the pope asked for pardon when he was in australia last time, and thats was the end of it.
I don't find this kind of art funny or appreciative, like that "artist" in South America who tied a dog to a wire and let him die of hunger in an art gallery as part of his (s**t) masterpieces. Thse people should be made victims of their masterpieces, to experience first hand their horrible creation.
However, in Malta we have more blasphemous acts on a daily basis, like the decorated swearing of many people, which I literally and totally disgust.
On my part please rest assured that I would sleep tonight :)
Please illuminate us with some constructive criticism then :P I did not see no light yet from your argument.
The Philippines example you mentioned is done on Good Friday to try and imitate Chirst's cruxifiction you know!
Jesus was not the only person who was nailed to the crossed. still happens today in the philippines.
My argument was why is it that we have to condone anything we do not agree with. if you do not like it, don't look at it. im sure you wont sleep tonight. im sure i will :)
i ask again why?
Mention if it is not true that at least one religious work of art does not portay an image of violence. And if there is one, should it be destroyed?
What an empty argument!!!
the work of arts depicting people being be-headed or what not, those glorious works of art done for the religious order, for me they convey violence but apparently just because they are hanging in a chapel and showing a saint, we can close an eye.
this german guy is not imposing anything . it is our own free will, if we want to acknowledge and visit his works.
I stop short here as if we are to get offended with such sculptures.. let as look at our own islands and just be "mesmerised with holy statues" , some do tend to insult our faith . let me say "unknowingly" ..
To hell with art experts!