• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Talking Point

Our tourism environment

We cannot have a sustainable tourism industry if we do not maintain, conserve, and upgrade our environment. This fact is unequivocally stated in our national tourism policy. As a matter of fact, the first two policy objectives of the Tourism Policy for the Maltese Islands 2007-2011 are:

"To manage tourism in Malta and Gozo on the principles of sustainable development";

"To maintain and conserve environmental and socio-cultural resources, being the key elements of the Maltese Islands' tourism product".

Our tourism policy and plan not only recognises the essential role played by the environment but also includes a list of actions that need to be taken to ensure that tourism development overall enhances not devalues our environment. One such action states that: "We will formulate clear criteria for assessing public and private proposals for projects on the basis of their contribution to tourism, to environmental protection and to social well-being".

It could be that the Malta Tourism Authority's product development directorate or its consultants took in the past too narrow a view when assessing tourism development applications, ignoring environmental considerations on the understanding that these will be looked into by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority. Likewise Mepa did not comment on tourism aspects of a development application, leaving such considerations to the MTA.

The Tourism Policy for the Maltese Islands 2007-2011 demanded a change in this procedure. It is unfortunate that apparently the change in procedure may have taken longer than one would have wished for. Any report drawn up by the MTA after the Tourism Policy for the Maltese Islands 2007-2011 was adopted in January 2007, ought to take into account environment considerations.

Furthermore the National Tourism Policy and Plan include no reference to the need to spread places of entertainment to the north. The government does believe, however, in the need to enhance the quality of the product we offer in St Paul's Bay, Buġibba and Qawra and to this effect has recently approved three EU funded projects to the value of €12 million consisting in the creation of a promenade at St Paul's Bay, a new sandy beach in Qawra and a visitors attraction with diving facilities at Qawra Point.

It is fundamental that all decisions taken by the MTA and the Tourism Policy Unit, to approve or disapprove any tourism related projects, are to be taken on the basis of how this project will help us achieve the policy objectives of the National Tourism Policy, including that of protecting our environment.

Much has been done by both the government and the private sector over the past years to improve our tourism offering. Having said this, I would be the first to agree that much more needs to be done. I can assure readers of one thing: Tourism development should not happen at the expense of our environment. If anything, our future depends on making the most of our environment to attract the ever growing segment of environment-conscious tourists. It is, after all, the Malta we want to live in, the Malta to which we want to welcome our tourists, and the Malta we want to pass on to our children.

Dr de Marco is Parliamentary Secretary for Tourism.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Adrian Borg Olivier (on 27/8/08)
Dr Demarco's points are well taken His last para however though is rather vague. Of course "tourism development SHOULD NOT happen at the expense of our environment".
We all know this and agree with it.
However if Dr Demarco wishes us to believe that the future will be any different from the recent past his article should have stated " tourism development WILL NOT happen ... ".
He is after all in a position to insist on this and to do something about it !
D. Fenech (on 27/8/08)
It is a fine piece by Dr DeMarco but clearly MTA is running at tangents to his idea. The leadership of MTA are not interested in the environment surrounding our hotels.

I wrote to MTA about the distasteful scenerio around the three 4star hotels in Mellieha village. All three are overlooking tower cranes. Two of these tower cranes were errected in June, the month when tourism peaks. The brochures portray views of the blue Mellieha Beach yet when the guests arrive, they are faced with tower cranes. One particular 4star has actually got two tower cranes hovering over its rooftop pool. Its beyond belief what the guests have got to put up with.
The pass the buck answer from MTA was to pass my complaint on to Mepa. What is the point of having MTA in the first place? Well this week we got the answer from the Chairman himself. MTA cannot be bothered to take the environment on board.
David Borg (on 27/8/08)
So now after 20 years of turning Malta into the European version of the Gaza Strip, the PN have suddenly become all green. Admitting that "more needs to be done" is politicians code for "we have totally failed".
Robert Zammit (on 27/8/08)
Dr Demarco is one of the few in this government I have faith in and i wish him all the very best .
I think he is on the right track , one word of warning, before going for number first go for quality, number will automatically follow once the quality is coming to Malta. Please stop listening to those around you who will keep trying to justify more and more monies spent on he UK & German markets, they've been doing that for years and won't change their way cos of their own hidden agendas! Diversify, grow Italy, France, Spain Portugal, go for quality advertising, in quality mags etc, in these markets !
You'll find this difficult, but if you insist MTA will have no choice but to follow what you say !! Don't be scared of them there, do what you ahve to do, and what you feel is best and you'll be an even bigger success !!
Joe Morana (on 27/8/08)
The PS Dr de Marco 's contribution is most welcomed as it acknowedges the evironment as a most important and integral element of the Maltese Tourism product. Dr. de Marco's reference to the Tourism Policy for the Maltese Islands 2007-2011 adopted in January 2007, makes one seriuously question MTA 's course of action regarding the Mistra saga, as it seems that MTA ignored its own new Tourism Policy for the Maltese Islands 2007 -2011 .
Alfred Grech (on 27/8/08)
Mario De Marco seems to have the right mentality when it comes to tourism. But he needs to run after the ministers in charge of development and in charge of the brooms and shovels to make sure that tourists' areas are up to par with today's needs and to keep them clean.

Malta is so tiny and in my opinion it should be kept spotless even though many Maltese are careless and still dump garbage on the streets which is a shame.

Government need to have a promotional program to educate people to keep the country clean. This should be followed by action by the government to clean our streets and by the police to charge those who throw garbage on the streets.

Both government and the people need more will power.
Carmel Cacopardo (on 27/8/08)
In view of the clear conflict between Mario de Mrco's talking point and Sam Mifsud's statement, I await Sam Mifsud's letter of resignation as Chairman of MTA !
Dominic Newland (on 27/8/08)
What is the environmental capacity of tourist volume in Malta? Every extra tourist needs laundry, showers, crockery washed etc. which in turn needs extra oil burned to desalinate. The Parliamentary Secretary for Tourism states that, "Tourism development should not happen at the expense of our environment". Well, every incremental tourist arrival is at the expense of the environment to some extent and I think it's greater than is understood. A noble publicly stated strategic aim would be to seek growth exclusively through higher spend per tourist and not through ever more volume of arrivals. Providing more beaches and promenades for tourist to go to sounds like a volume strategy.
Muscat Peter (on 27/8/08)
Dr. Mario Demarco is very correct and he is one the most valid members in Gonzi's Cabinet.
He is the future and it is very unfortunate that the PN's propoganda machine is not 'so friendly' towards him and his family.

When one considers the fact the 'party machine' of the PN is much more influential in chosing its leaders than that of the MLP, Dr. Mario Demarco will certainly have a great struggle ahead of him in the near future.

I wish Dr Mario Demarco the best in his political career and hope and pray that he will make it to the top spot soon.

Good luck Mar!
Emmanuel Cachia (on 27/8/08)
The PS for Tourism says that we cannot have a sustainable tourism industry if we do not maintain, conserve, and upgrade our environment just a few days after the chairman of the National Tourism Authority expressed himself very differently. Which one is real?

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku