
Saturday, 9th August 2008 - 13:00CET
Alternative to car registration tax 'should be introduced immediately'
The government’s lethargy to remove the car registration tax is destroying the car sale business due to lack of orders, the Labour Party’s spokesman for economy and the self-employed, Gavin Gulia, said.
He said that this was because consumers were waiting for the current system to be changed. This, Dr Gulia said, was confirmed by the Association of Car Importer Malta.
He said that the government had announced it would change the current system in the coming budget but businesses could not take any more delays and expected to be given detailed information on the new system immediately.
While the government said that studies had to be held before a new system was introduced, it did not hold any studies before increasing the surcharge to 95 per cent on small businesses, most of them family run, Dr Gulia pointed out.







RSS
Comments
Where are our rights as EU citizens?
And please don't harp about public transport, it doesn't exist where I work. Anyone who needs to go anywhere, within a reasoble time-frame can't depend on public transport.
The Government should tax the use of cars not the car itself!. Someone with a fuel efficient car who travels 50 000km a year should pay more tax than someone who has a large sportscar and just travels a 500 km a year on Sunday drives. (NO! I don't have one!)
The answer is to tax the use of fuel.
Maltese authorities please wake up, we Maltese citizens are more capable in these positions then the rubbish we are getting from abroad !!!
Proud to be Maltese.
I dont think that the good old Govt is going to reduce this unfiar tax without making good form elsewhere.
All those that are so quick to compare prices with the UK (and other EU countries) should check what these people pay as annual road licences, and they'll be shocked.
Is that what they want in Malta?
for example:
UK:
For a car up to 1549cc, 'tax disc' is GBP 120 a year (Eur 153).
Plus:
For cars registered after 1 March 2001, a tax based on the CO2 emission, which ranges from GBP 35 (101-120g/km) to GBP 400 (over 225g/km).
Light goods vehicles pay GBP 180 (we used to pay Lm 40/Eur 93)
For alternative fuel cars, rates area a bit cheaper.
You have to take the difference over a number of years.
(check:http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_10012524)
Cars don't pollute, it's the use of cars that pollute. If the government has a green agenda, it should be taxing the use of cars rather than the cars themselves.
By increasing the tax on petrol and diesel, the government will be taxing the use of vehicles and could afford to reduce or remove registration taxes. With oil prices starting to fall the tax increase could be mostly absorbed within the current fuel prices.
Commercial, essential and public transport vehicles could have their annual Road Fund Licence reduced to compensate for the increased running costs.
It will therefore cost you more to run a car with high CO2 emissions engine, than one with a green lean engine. So larger cars will still be taxed more than smaller cars.
People who currently have no alternative than running an old banger with high CO2 emissions may be persuaded to upgrade to a more fuel efficient car, once newer cars become more affordable to buy and less expensive to run.
This tax will discourage the use of cars, and encourage car sharing, more use of public transport , not to mention cyling and walking, conducive to less congested roads and a healtier nation.
Dr Gulia is right, they didnt take this long to increase the surcharge did they!!!!?
No consultation = complaints
Government consults = complaints.
when do we learn?
do you really expect a new system to be developed, discussed and approved in a few weeks?
moreover - Govt has already publicly declared that if we buy a car in 2008 and we end up paying additional car reg tax...we will get a refund. So what's the big issue here?
I'm sure the car dealers wont go bankrupt with a few less cars sold. not to mention that in summer such business is always less positive than the remaining months
On the hand there is procrastination to initiate EU programmes such as the Leader approach where the economy can benefit with around 40 million euros of funds that could be invested into our rural areas and increase the valorisation of rural environment and rural heritage.
We are also missing on other EU funds as the engaged persons lack the required canny mind to operate into such a web of EU funding processes. 200 are words are not enough.