• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

New car importers voice objections to proposed tax system

New car importers today called for an urgent meeting with the government to finalise the new vehicle tax system and for a formal announcement of the new system to be made immediately.

William Shaw, Secretary of ACIM (Association of Car Importers Malta), said:

“The government is feeling comfortable with progress on the new vehicle tax regime because the figures for the first six months of the year, which reflect cars delivered, are more or less the same as last year’s. But this year new car importers have received far fewer orders than last year.

“This has already started showing in the figures for June and July, and will be felt more and more in the remaining months of 2008.”

Mr Shaw stressed that ACIM is not insisting that the new system be introduced immediately if the government is not in a position to implement it. “At least we will know what the new system is, we will be in a position to order vehicles according to the new norms to be introduced in the coming months and the Maltese will know the price they have to pay for these vehicles.”

He explained that there had been great expectation for the reform in the registration tax system since Malta joined the EU and prices had become more transparent since the adoption of the euro. The Maltese could see prices shown in TV commercials in Italy and compare them with local prices.

Commenting on the proposed new system, Mr Shaw said ACIM does not agree with the congestion element since Malta, as far as was known, would be unique in adopting this type of tax on car sales. Congestion charges are applied in cities, and there is already one in operation in Malta – in Valletta.

“ACIM understands that, under the new tax system, small cars will go down in price. In our opinion, this decrease is not enough because medium sized cars will cost the same and large cars are going to go up,” Mr Shaw said. “This measure will negatively affect Maltese families with children because they need a medium-sized car and these are the cars that are taxed the most.

“Under the new tax system new cars are not going to be significantly cheaper.”

He said the ACIM also objects about the delay in the publication and introduction of the new tax system, a lack of consultation on the details of how the new congestion element of the tax is going to work and the collection of VAT on the registration tax – a tax on a tax – which Government continues to collect in breach of EU directives.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Arturo Lucci (on 19/8/08)
Car tax has been a major source of income. What government wants is new rules that comply with EU but which will generate the same amount of income. If they can adapt the tax rules to look "green" as well than thy will have scored some more kudos. It is a simple as that.
Mark Micallef (on 12/8/08)
Whilst I agree with some of the posters that reducing vehicle siize might help alevate the problem, one has to keep in mind the use of the said vehicle. Motorcycles are statistically proven as the unsafest means of transport. Has anyone been to Italy lately? These little mopeds make an awfull amount of irritating noise which is very distrubing, particularly at night. Families cannot possibly use motorcycles and goods cannot be carried on motorcycles. Even these little hatches cannot carrry a family and their monthly shopping properly, so mid size family cars are in some cases inevitable. The most efficient would be an MPV 6 seater BUT fully laden as much as possible. Therefore I agree that parking meters should also be introduced
In some countries a timer is displayed under traffic lights which indicate the time to the next green. If it is more than 1minute, it is mandatory to turn off your engine. At night, with no conflicting traffic, red lights turn green on an approaching car so as to prevent unnecessary stopping. Our politicians should look a bit around them when they are touring other countries at our expense!
Geir Nilsen (on 10/8/08)
The traffic and parking problems is why the number of cars have to be reduced, not pollution. If the government really worried about pollution, they would subsidise solar panels a lot more so that the Maltese actually went out and bought one. In my opinion there should be one on virtually every roof, especially because the cost of energy will only rise. Burning fossile fuels is also a lot more polluting than driving cars (which in any case is a necessity for many businesses and families with children), and the difference in emissions old vs new cars is after all a miniscule 25%. It really won't help save the planet.
Geir Nilsen (on 10/8/08)
Cars should be very expensive, perhaps even more than now for the people who don't really need one. BUT! That presupposes the money from this taxation is being spent on a ten times better bus service with a lot more routes and aircons/fans. Because you can't tax car owners to death without giving them an alternative. That is what is happening now. Also, spend some of the money from that taxation on maintaining the road. As a foreigner I have seen worse roads only in Cambodia. Better roads would also lead to more people buying scooters which pollute zip, reduce congestion and don't take up parking spaces. And that is another thing: If the government REALLY worried about pollution, they would SUBSIDISE scooters and light motorcycles. Now even 250cc motorcycles are being heavily taxed (a 250cc costs about double (100% more) of a 125cc, while in Spain it costs 20% more)! A 0.25 litre motorcycle pollutes almost nothing compared to even small city cars with 1 litre engines, and as important, it weighs about seven times less, which takes a lot less fuel to pull and wears out the roads a lot less. It really is beyond me.
Shaun Camilleri (on 10/8/08)
I do not see the fuss of the new tax if smaller cars will cost less. In Malta smaller cars are the best option as they take less space and consume less; plus insurance wise they are cheaper to insure too.

Car importers are trying to give the impression that they care about us as a whole by making statements that families will most be effected as medium sized cars will be the same in price. The average family today is small and a small car is adequet. No one will drive for hours and hours to get to a place and if people had more small cars there would be more space to park them. Importers have a larger profit on larger cars.

The congestion charge I personally believe and feel it is a way for the government to keep the income it gets from the system of registration that there is now. The government does not care about the environment - only sponging.

The craters in the roads do not just cause damage to vehicles but could cause you to loose control of it and cause internal injury due to the organs shaking.
Andy Corbet (on 10/8/08)
The system needs a complete overhaul starting with the ADT. Its seems that it takes around 7-10 days to issue new registrations and plates for new cars. Third world stuff!!
joseph calleja (on 9/8/08)
@ Edward Zahra

sorry but that is twisted reasoning. When you weigh the average income of us Maltese compared to that fo the UK the price of new cars is an unjustifiable and complete rip off. No twisting and bending of facts and figures will change that. What makes the situation the all more pathetic is the disastrous state of our roads in general.



Mark Micallef (on 9/8/08)
Mr. E. Zahra. It takes one stupid to recognise the other. Sorry, I don't approve of name calling, so in my eyes your case is lost. We are deviating from the topic of cars and environment vis-vis the new tax to people being over protective of their party in goverment and including insurance, fuel and anything under the sun but the real crux of the problem is that with this proposed new tax, (Ms Bencini seems to know more than most of us, she has been consulted), NOTHING is being done to save the environment.
My proposal is something short of taxing euro for gram of CO2/pax and give incentives to people who actually take care of their car and is still within EU levels. Using car pooling lanes and taxes like CVA are also ideas to curb the use of cars. Single lane roads, non computerised traffic lights, ridiculous speed limits forcing drivers to drive in 3rd gear, pathetic public transport, no monorail/underground systems are the reasons I state that the goverment is mostly responsible for the sorry state of our poor air quality and low quality cars.
Alex Tanti (on 9/8/08)
Flimkien Kollox Possibbli,
biss kif u meta qiesu hadd ma jaf!
Rosanne Bencini (on 9/8/08)
@A Micallef

Why do you say Govt is procrastinating?

Two months ago Government promised a new system. When Government rushes through certain reforms, it is RIGHTLY criticised for not consulting. Fair enough.
but now that Government has taken time to meet with the different stakeholders....it is procrastinating?
Why do you mention the need (or someone else) of a White Paper? Did you read the full proposal in the pre-budget document?
Why do some people speak befoer looking at the whole picture.

Government started operating in March. If we have a new and effective system in place by budget, that's around 6 months, I think that's fair enough.

Edward Zahra (on 9/8/08)
@Monique S

you say
Malta has to follow suit on countries such as the UK which do not pay any tax when buying a new car and replace their car every 3 years. We are EU citizens AND WE WANT SUCH BENEFITS!!!

again..same line of thought here. Since when EU rights mean you get the same service as in another country?
You mention the UK. Their cars are cheaper. But as I wrote in the previous post. Fuel, insurance, services are much more expensive.

And it's not just for cars. Think energy. Do you ever think why so many British tourists come to Malta (Especially elderly) in Winter and live whole weeks/months in hotel? Yes, they find that living a month in a hotel here is actually cheaper than staying at home and paying the electricity bills. So, should they, as EU citizens demand exactly the same electricity bill (cheaper) as in Malta?

What if Government decides to change the side of the road we drive on, to be like, say, the Italians? Isnt that an "EU" right?
What if Government allows councils (like in most EU countries) to impose taxes, justifying itself that it is an EU right?
Edward Zahra (on 9/8/08)
@Micallef
You say

Why should cars in Malta be more expensive when compard to other EU countries? After being in the EU since 2004 it is well overdue that the Maltese should have the same rights and obligations as all the other EU citizens.

Sorry but this is stupid (would have preferred avoiding this word but couldnt think of any).
Since when being in the EU, and having the same RIGHTS ..mean same PRICES?

Ok- you want to pay the same price for cars like the rest of the EU.
But then what do you say about the fact that
a) insurances cost around 30% (EU average) than in Malta?
b) fuel costs around 30% more than in Malta?
c) that Car services companies would charge you more than two times the amount you'd pay in Malta?

Come on...

I would love cheaper cards mind you.
I'm not doign any political arguments here. It's just that it doesnt make sense to say "we joined the EU..then same prices"
George Falzon (on 9/8/08)
Cars don't pollute, it's the use of cars that pollute. If the government has a green agenda, it should be taxing the use of cars rather than the cars themselves.

By increasing the tax on petrol and diesel, the government will be taxing the use of vehicles and could afford to reduce or remove registration taxes. With oil prices starting to fall the tax increase could be mostly absorbed within the current fuel prices.

Commercial, essential and public transport vehicles could have their annual Road Fund Licence reduced to compensate for the increased running costs.

It will therefore cost you more to run a car with high CO2 emissions engine, than one with a green lean engine. So larger cars will still be taxed more than smaller cars.

People who currently have no alternative than running an old banger with high CO2 emissions may be persuaded to upgrade to a more fuel efficient car, once newer cars become more affordable to buy and less expensive to run.

This tax will discourage the use of cars, and encourage car sharing, more use of public transport , not to mention cyling and walking, conducive to less congested roads and a healtier nation.
Monique Sciberras (on 9/8/08)
It is hightime that our government takes some action to encourage customers to replace these old cars which emit so much pollution. New cars are much more clean and safe and like other EU countries we should have newer cars on the road.

Malta has to follow suit on countries such as the UK which do not pay any tax when buying a new car and replace their car every 3 years. We are EU citizens AND WE WANT SUCH BENEFITS!!!
Alan Micallef (on 9/8/08)
I am very disappointed with the Government's procrasting decision with the registration tax. We were promised to have a decision 2 months ago and we still have not had any feedback from our leaders.

Why should cars in Malta be more expensive when compard to other EU countries? After being in the EU since 2004 it is well overdue that the Maltese should have the same rights and obligations as all the other EU citizens.

I think that Hybrid cars should be incentivised and omitted from paying taxes. Cars of the sort include the Toyota Prius which are very environmental friendly.

I hope that all these comments are taken seriously and action will be taken as soon as possible.
Mark Bonello (on 9/8/08)
I wonder whether the government will come up with a " LIDL" of automobiles, that would be a great 2nd step forward ........oh, and whilst we're at it how about decreasing our new electricity surcharge rate since crude oil prices are going down.....or do we purchase all our needs when the prices are at their peak?
Nicholas Attard (on 9/8/08)
It is a shame that us Maltese as EU citizens, cannot change our cars more frequently due to governments stubbornness to keep new cars expensive in Malta. Why should Italians buy new cars at 35% less than Maltese when they have such a higher standard of living?!
Andy Corbet (on 9/8/08)
The points raised by the association are reasonable. It would be interesting to know how the employees dependant on the industry have been effected as in redundancies and income. Also, It's incredible how the government hasn't realized that no one seems to be supporting the present system and everyone thinks that the system is unjust and primitive.
MANNES CALLEJA (on 9/8/08)
Cheaper cars ha ha !!!!!! don't you know that election have passed members of parliment are know in their cushiest sofa please citizen pay more tax like it or not
mannes
Joseph Calleja (on 9/8/08)
The proposition is daylight robbery. What every new car buyer should do is get a car from any European country and take the government to court if it tries to impose its unjustified taxes. People do not realise that in Malta we pay the highest price for new cars anywhere in the world to be used on probably the worst roads in Europe.
Maria Pace (on 9/8/08)
To all you PN apologists below who are calling on the Opposition to wake up, I think you'd better wake up yourselves and remove those blinkers.

The Opposition spoke about the issue of the car registration tax twice in the last few days. In an article entitled 'Uncertainty over registration tax messing up car business' on the 31st of July, Gavin Gulia and Joe Mizzi highlighted the notion that "the fact that the government was dragging its feet over the removal of the registration tax was bringing about uncertainty" among sellers and buyers alike.
Furthermore, on the 4th of August, Labour Party spokesman Dr. Gavin Gulia further tackled this issue in an article entitled 'Labour highlights uncertainty in car market'.

The articles are still available on this website if you spare a minute to use the 'Quick search' facility on this site and find them before you start firing your brimmed canons.
Patricia Stafrace (on 9/8/08)
The problem in Malta is that we are a country of old junky vehicles, this can be easily noted by the fact that the average lifecycle of cars in the EU is of 5 years while in Malta is of 20+ years. One wonders at the level of pollution that these old vehicles contribute to vis a vis new vehicles which are certainly safer and much more eco friendly.

On the other hand our current tax regime is a complete joke, the European dream we opted for as a country was mainly in order to rectify these irregularities and not to be lumped with the same taxes camouflaged in a different aformat. We expect our cars to be at the same rates as our European peers.
Justin Spiteri (on 9/8/08)
@A. Zammit ... Why are our cars average 20 years old? Well, because, many people includng me, get pissed off seeing a brand new grande punto sell in italy for 8000 EUR, while in malta the base version is LM 7200 (16,776 EUR). with a little more than 16,776 EUR, in germany you buy a BMW 1 series... what the hell, i'm not going to let them skin me, so there you go. You'll still see me driving with my 20 year old banger with a japanese diesel engine transplant job, done for lm 500. Who cares about emissions?
The government doesn't!! If they did, they would have subsidised cars with less than 120g/km emissions.

RE another topic: The promised income tax revisions.. the pre-election promise for re-revision of income tax in budget 2009 was lately uncertain since oil reached over $140 barrel, understandable. But guess what, surprise!! Today oil dipped below $118, and it's going down.

1.) When is petrol going to decrease at the pump?

2.) Since oil went down, there's no reason why the income tax revision should be cancelled... am i right!?!?
matthew shembri (on 8/8/08)
Second hand cars that are imported from the EU and are already registered in the EU in my opinion, they don't have to pay registration tax again when they come to malta. This is a regulation in the EU. People want to do something about it. Let us go infront of the EU and tell our opinion about it, and let the EU court decide. After all we want everything to be EU standard not only the income of the government and the tax to be EU standard
Michael Porter (on 8/8/08)
We have been punished by all this discrimination for long years. I feel punished just because I like 4x4 vehicles.... which I can't even buy due to these taxes. Just a hop over to our EU neighbours and these vehicles are less than half the price. EU?Where are You??
Paul Formosa (on 8/8/08)
Although we are members of the European Union, our income is lower than other EU countries. But the prices of cars are extremely higher because of the high percentage rate of Registration Tax imposed by the government. It's not true that with the new tax system the prices are going to decrease - its only a change in the name! Taxes on new cars should be REMOVED
Joseph Duca (on 8/8/08)
Tax on car lenght, tax on engine capacity, congestion charge, fuel tax, road tax?
Let them have it all. With the revenue we can start filling the 'Hofra' (which everyone seems to have forgotten). After all ' B' tal-linja jaqbillek ' and there is still plenty of time for the next election.
Mark Micallef (on 8/8/08)
Why oh why do we try and re-invent the wheel? Tax on car length! From where do they get these ideas? Why do we have to fight and argue over what in other countries is a way of life? With the heaviest poluters being our not-so-state-o-the-art Power stations and one of the highest level of particulate polution in the EU. Let's tax modern cars.
GM kindly get it in your thick head, people NEED cars, so if it's a brand new efficient car or a second hand dumped car or an old banger barely making VRT illegally once a year, people will use the car. Why? Because you, dear Goverment are going to SUBSIDISE criminal bus drivers/owners to do what is normal in other industries, competition. Our public transport is, to say the least ,pathetic, as is traffic control which seems to be taken out of a 1940s book of traffic managment. NONE.
R.Gauci (on 8/8/08)
The only cars this goverment was capable not to tax were the CHOGM BMW'S! Which ended up in the hands of guess who? The usual bunch of rich people & speculators!

Flimkien Kollox Possibli!! :)
Steve Sant Fournier (on 8/8/08)
Hey. the truth is who cares about the consumer, or the environment in the Governments eyes, its the money that is made from the sale of these cars. In truth all cars are imported rock bottom price, you pay about 65% to 95% registration and Duty (depending on country) and 18% VAT (figures are approx.). The car cost is approx. 20-30% of the price we pay for it. So its all about how much money the Government can take from you. Nothing more and nothing less.
laurence schembri (on 8/8/08)
On this point I stand to be corrected, but if I remember rightly the 60+% of the price on car registration tax was brought in by a Labour Government under Mintoff to deter hard earned cash to leave our shores, plus that space for so much traffic on this little isle was limited.
The opposition called this an unjust tax and also argued that people should be free to do what they want with their money.
25 years later, and this unjust tax is still in existense, even on second hand cars that are imorted from the EU and are already registered in the EU.
According to Tonio Fenech this will be sorted out in he next budget (bagit), and Pigs Might Fly,
what is happening now is that we are putting the blame on the invironment, so as you will see, it will be a matter of `Taking it from Paul to give to Peter` and in all probabilities we will end up paying more, just wait and see.
A. Zammit (on 8/8/08)
The Maltese public deserves better than to be treated as second class European citizens when it comes to personal transportation. Ask yourself - why is the average age of cars on our roads 20 years and over? Why is it that out of a total car pool of over 250,000 less than 6000 new cars are being registered every year and even less scrapped?

Let's be honest, t's obvious that a reduction in taxes on new cars should benefit the car importers - but at the end of the day, what benefits them is automatically going to benefit Joe public who would finally have access to more affordable, cleaner and safer new cars.
Emmanuel Apap (on 8/8/08)
@S Galea Vincenti. You are right that we need to cap the amount of cars on our roads, however I would rather make new cars cheap, and hence have a cleaner enviorment and heavily tax older cars. That way we can more or less have the same amount of cars on our roads, but most of them would be new and we will force people to get rid of the older cars.
Michael Tabone (on 8/8/08)
Question on my mind is why everyone looks towards the opposition. In the state that it's in now (and not even in government which is the funny thing) I wouldn't expect the opposition to be able to handle things. The government has a huge expenditure and wastes a lot of the country's money as well. It is a crap government I agree but we had no better alternative I believe.

Anyway, the fact remains huge expenditure, so they make most of their money from the revenue. In my opinion the government should find some otherway to have their revenue meet their expenditure. Buget more and waste less rediculous amounts of money. Read MaltaToday and you'll be impressed at how much money the government wastes.

I believe these are difficult times for a lot of countries, not just ours. While we do have high taxes on many things, we are surviving a very difficult era. Unfortunately where else can the government make it's revenue if not from it's own people. We have no other resource...

Luckily the country still is surviving, we don't suffer what even the most powerful countries suffer, but we need a source of income.
Sergio Galea Vincenti (on 8/8/08)
@ Alfred Cachia: The argument is simple: Certain classes of large business concerns can do what the hell they want.

The reduction in prices of new motor vehicles shall do nothing but further add on to the 291,000 motor vehicles we have already in Malta. Car registration - even though a questionable tax by many standards and despite the fact that it is outrageously high - has proven to have today become an ineffective deterrent to control the influx of new vehicles in Malta.

The truth is that the authorities need to cap the number of motor vehicles in our unlivable towns, drastically improve public transport and promote the scrapping of any inefficient vehicles which litter our streets.

The same decisive forms of controls are necessary on other sectors because we cannot have the absurd situation we have today where laissez-faire rules the day.
carmelo briffa (on 8/8/08)
X' opposition , opposition, do we have one?
Alfred Cachia (on 8/8/08)
@ Galea VIncenti

Nobody is understanding your point. It has nothing to do with car registration. Please explain.
Alfio Zahra (on 8/8/08)
We are EU citizens, but we are DIFFERENT. We have a lower income and higher priced cars. Large families who pay a hefty amount of surcharge will now have to pay more road licence just because their vehicles are a few cm longer! So only 20yr olds buying small cars will benefit the new tax. But these are not the only persons that have elected this govt. Opposition wake up pls.
vincent a galea (on 8/8/08)
I remember the days when we used to say, "MELA HAWN QEGHDIN IR-RUSSJA?" OPPOSITION wake up! Show us your WORTH and prove that Malta is a DEMOCRACY!! After all there is not much difference in VOTES between YOU and THEM.... As I heard Evarist Bartolo say recently, "GHANDHOM DAQSNA SIGGIJIET U BANKETTA!"
Sergio Galea Vincenti (on 8/8/08)
Car importers, property developers, etc.... These sort of businesses should be heavily regulated because their businesses have and are constituting a burden on the country's environment. There are alternatives but, of course, the easy way out is the order of the day here.

Likewise, the same arguments apply for so many other sectors - and not just the transport workers who went on strike some weeks ago. Suffice to say, one needs only compare certain prices we pay for essential commodities (like pharmaceuticals) to start wondering whether we are being taken for the proverbial ride.

And I won't go into the merits of other key industries such as, for example, financial services where the profits registered speak for themselves.

No wonder we are so vociferously sold the mantra that governments should adopt a laissez-faire attitude towards business! Mind you, most businesses - especially the SMEs - are as much victims to these practices as the ordinary man in the street who is so blissfully immersed in waving blue, red or whatever coloured flag is thrust into his hands.
Emmanuel Apap (on 8/8/08)
This is really a country and a governmeent of bla bla bla ! All this time and bla about the proposed tax system and what is the end result - “Under the new tax system new cars are not going to be significantly cheaper.” It is obvious that the election has come and gone.

The people want cheaper cars, but if there is to be little change in the price why change the tax system. What do we care what the system is called or how it works. The end result is always the same, we are the 2nd most taxed country and our wages are a joke. I expect GonziPN to bring our wages upto date with the rest of europe, then he can introduce this NEW system.

Joseph Cauchi (on 8/8/08)
All this tax business of car imports, is nothing but a question of how is the government going to fill up his coffers.

The government needs a certain amount of revenue in order to cover the current expenditure.

If it is not from the car imports registration fees, vat, road tax, fuel tax, etc... then, the government has to find alternative sources of revenue.

It is only a question of balancing the books, that's all !!!

It's logical.

Cheers.
Mario Zammit (on 8/8/08)
Why do we have to lag behind in all respects when compared to the EU? Are we in or out? At least some sort of White Paper should have been published. If government adopted a system whereby incentives for renewing our ageing vehicles (offering a basic amount of money for cars older that 10 years when changing for a new car) that would surely lessen harmful CO2 on a national scale. This would reverse the trend of filling our roads with Japanese rejects.
laurence schembri (on 8/8/08)
For the past 20 years this government has scraped by on whatever they can get out of your pocket.
If any blogger below this thinks that he will get any tax reduction on anything, especially car registration, forget it.
The coffers are below sea level. What each and every one of us was made to believe is all fiction.
D.Borg (on 8/8/08)
Cheaper cars will not contribute to an increase in the circulating cars on the Maltese roads. This is because with the present system, anyone who wants a car just buys it. But instead of buying a new and fuel efficient car, they will opt for a second hand old car. With cheaper car prices, we will start seeing more new cars on the road which will be replacing the old cars.

Regarding second hand cars imported from the EU, I cannot understand why to import a car from eg. Luxembourg to Germany you have to pay 30€ for the no. plate and tax, and to import to Malta you have to pay thousands of €. This is pure discrimination in the face of the Maltese consumer.
uian borg (on 8/8/08)
What a joke!i cannot beleive we are a democratic country in the european union and we can only sit and let this government rip us off and laugh! oh and by the way charge vat on importation tax which is illegal.What an example the government actually breaks the law and is ok with it just because he can!
Paul Savona (on 8/8/08)
I am not sure what these new proposals are going to be but it seems as though it is going to be related to road tax. Basically the more petrol your car used the more tax you pay.

This is a severely flawed system as consumption of petrol is based on usage not the cost of the car.

As such the only FAIR solution would be to abolish the current road tax system and introduce a tax on petrol. The more you use the more you pay. The less you use, the less you pay. Basically you pay for your consumption.

This way, the government can do away with the whole department responsible for Road Tax, save all the time and money spent on Insurance companies issuing the disk, one less task the traffic warden has to do and ensure that everyone does actually pay it.

It is such a simple, easy and obviously the most effective solution that I am sure no one would even consider it.
R. Buttigieg (on 8/8/08)
Why will there be a tax reform??? We will be paying much higher prices in order to be able to purchase a new car. Well if the government wants to decrease traffic around the maltese islands, it would be much better if the public transport system is adjusted, and modernised. like that people who can do without a car would not have to pay that much money and at the same time reducing emissions.

Obviously enough, we can see that there is a huge difference in price when comparing new car prices in Malta with those in Italy and the rest of EU. We are not as dumb as the govt thinks we are.

People who are in the motorsport scene will have a negative effect as well. Why should I Buy a fast car that costs €40,000, having to pay a further 65% on top of that and another 18% on the gross value? (which the final value comes up to €77880) This is a complete ripoff.

WE NEED A GOOD SYSTEM THAT IS OF AID TO THE MALTESE AND NOT OF A DETERRANT
N Attard (on 8/8/08)
The present system (2nd highest vehicle tax in europe leading to extremely expensive new cars) still led to all these cars we have in the road. The regTax is only an excuse for more and more money to the goverment. It was not a deterrent at all. People still bought cars and those who cannot afford new ones bought old junk or second hand imports which were first used in other countries. It is a shame that most of our cars are not equipped with ABS, airbags and the rest. People have to pay for the taxes intstead of these extras.
If prices are cheaper, at least the roads would have better looking, safer and more environmentally friendly vehicles.
Mario De Bono (on 8/8/08)
The motoring public was expecting much cheaper cars from this Government. Cars have become a way to tax our need for mobility beyond all measures. When will we realise this. What we need is a strong motoring lobby that will make sure that car prices are fair and within the reach of everybody.
Ian Sammut Dacoutros (on 8/8/08)
At the risk of being repetative, I am sure many have said the same as I have on several other blogs.

We are EU members right? Right. I can go anywhere in the EU and buy anything and just bring it to Malta right? Right.

What is the difference with a car? Why cant I just go to Italy or UK get a car, pay E50 for a licence plate and get it - period? What is all the hassle about?

I personally am one of those who has actually put off buying a car - I was supposed to get one over 3 months ago, i am going to wait to see.
Anthony A. Mifsud (on 8/8/08)
@ AP Aquillina.

Well stated, I just cant agree more, but do you really think that this Administaion give a toss about the Maltese families?

I an a Citizen I need a clear explanation as I got to vehicles from the Shaw's may be I get a rebait.

Toni
J Farrugia (on 8/8/08)
Government should give incentives for those with old cars to be able to buy a new car which will be environmental friendly (not electric cars which are a non sequitur). At least it should reduce the registration (or whatever tax is going to be ) tax so that poor and middle class can afford to buy another car instead of the old one they have.
d.grech (on 8/8/08)
why is it that you can go to the uk and buy a 1997 bmw for e1200 but malta will charge us e8000 to register it in malta we are all in the EU come on get real
Robert Cassar (on 8/8/08)
The government does not care about the needs of Maltese people.

Good point about the families but for sure it will fall on deaf ears. Mr Gonzi said to us many times that by 2010 the Government will break even so lets see if the price of cars will go down or not..

I bet it will not as all they care is how to make money out of us and its in their interest to keep Maltese people SUB STANDARD. Malta nothing more then a 3rd world country. I voted yes to EU so that I will have equal opportunities like other people in EU however the government treat us like slaves! TAX TAX & MORE TAX.
Michael Porter (on 8/8/08)
We need clear explanations regarding this issue. Why can't we enjoy the benefits of our neighbouring countries? Car prices there are significantly cheaper! I hope that the EU sees properly into this and hope that we EU citizens are treated like proper EU citizens! We need to know what's happening now.
Romeo Busuttil (on 8/8/08)
If I can buy anything else from any EU country and just bring it home and start using it without having to pay any other tax or VAT, why cannot I go to sicily, buy a car and bring it to Malta and use it freely? Is the tax the government charges on cars imported from another EU country in breach of EU laws or does the EU allow this? Can someone who is competent in this matter explain please?
Jean Pierre Aquilina (on 8/8/08)
“This measure will negatively affect Maltese families with children because they need a medium-sized car and these are the cars that are taxed the most."

This statement is a fact - families need a medium-sized car at least. Child and booster seats occupy lots of space and do not fit properly in small cars without compromising the safety of the children themselves. Furthermore children come with a lot of kit: pushchairs, bags, toys, etc all of which requires a decent sized boot.

I hope that the Government considers the needs of families when drafting the new measures.
P Gauci (on 8/8/08)
My heart bleeds for the new car importers.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku