• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Marsalforn operators complain of double standards in enforcement

What annoys operators most is the feeling that two weigths and two measures are applied.

Marsalforn restaurant owners have complained of double standards when it comes to enforcement in their locality: While street furniture not covered by an encroachment permit was removed shortly after a written warning, glaring illegal structures have been in place for ages.

Abusive structures in the popular seaside village remain under the threat of enforcement orders or orders for direct action which, however, never seem to be carried through.

The cases include a Mepa direct order on a "platform and non-solid screen and canopy for shelter" constructed some years ago by the Hotel Calypso. An application has now been filed by the hotel for sanctioning.

An enforcement order has also been issued for a concrete platform and ramp and stairs/ramp (referred to direct action) built without a permit at Il-Menqa, an aluminium structure on a pavement without a permit, and variations in internal and external layouts of a building from that approved in the permit, among other infringements.

Enforcement action was taken recently against non-compliant bars and restaurants in Marsalforn as well as in Xlendi when the authorities physically removed illegal street furniture, including plants, from public areas.

A few weeks ago similar enforcement action was taken at establishments along the Strand and Tignè seafront in Sliema. Officials even returned some days later to ensure that the furniture had not been put back in place.

A Marsalforn restaurant owner who preferred not to be named said he did not have an issue with the action, taken by the Malta Tourism Authority, the Lands Department and police officers some days ago, to remove the street furniture, or even with its timing at the peak of the season. His main gripe was the fact that the authorities sprung into action where owners breached their encroachment permits but then were so slow to act on much more serious infringements. What annoys operators most is the feeling that two weights and two measures are applied when dealing with large and small establishments, he said.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Alexander G Farrugia (on 11/8/08)
To A Camilleri...I see your point....pity you seemed not to have read my last two sentences! I'm writing them over again...just in case they were missed!

Let the Authorities allow more tables per establishment in Gozo! Everbody wins then!

Anne Marie Kissaun (on 9/8/08)
I very much agree with Mr. A. Camilleri. I have also been mentioning Amigos in Dingli Street, Sliema. May I suggest that when a permit is being given to Restaurants, Bars, Kiosks etc., a clause should be added to the permit specifiying what use can be made or can not be made of the frontage space. It seems that in Malta, whenever permits are given to these establishments, outdoor chairs and tables are the order of the day. One other example, a bar has opened in Floriana opposite the Lion Fountain, tables and chairs on the pavement were the first thing to appear. Unless a continuous surveillance is kept on these establishments, we will never get Malta in order.
A. Camilleri (on 8/8/08)
Come on Mr. Farrugia, let's not beat about the bush, please! Provided the establishments obtain whatever is required to increase the number of tables/seating from the relevant authorities, and is duly given, then this would be acceptable, but never without covering legal permits. Your point of view re Gozo and summer is appreciated, but there again, nobody, I stress nobody should take the law in his own hands; that is the main problem in our islands; many establishments and business concerns appear to be 'above the law', and simply do what they like. I do hope that you get the message, Mr. Farrugia. It's above all a question of "LAW ENFORCEMENT".
c attard (on 8/8/08)
Dream, dream, dream... Mr Farrugia I do not know where you are seeing six or eight tables, because after one week all restaurant owners reverted to their old practices. The scene caused when the authority intervened did not have long lasting effects.
Alexander G Farrugia (on 8/8/08)
It seems clear enough that establishments in M'forn were placing more tables and chairs than their permits consented. However, since everybody did it, no one complained. Yes, most of the operators did use more than their designated area, but since M'forn seafront is closed for traffic in the evening, pedestrians had ample space to stroll...a whole street and a promenade!
So, who gained from the Authority's actions? No one... One must realise once and for all that Gozo in NOT Sliema! Sliema is bustling with activity all year round, whereas M'forn and Xlendi do business in Summer only! I believe it only logical that operators try to do well in the Summer months before the long hibernation...even if that means some more tables than stricltly permitted!
No one gained, since now it is nearly impossible to find a table to dine or take a drink in Xlendi and M'forn! Tourists, Maltese and locals simply stroll by the six- or eight-tabled restaurants and bars, and simply move on, since it practically takes less than sixteen people to fill all tables!
So let's please treat Gozo differently than Malta. Let the Authorities allow more tables per establishment in Gozo! Everbody wins then!
George Saliba (on 8/8/08)
The lack of enforcement as well as dou ble standards is just not acceptable. The public is bein g denied access to areas that belong to them and neiother local councils nor th ePolice seem to be keen on curbing this abuse.

In M'scala one particluar restaurant has even surrounded a public stairs by chairs and tables and one has to ask patrons to make space in order to be able to use these stairs.

Mr. Calleja please wake up.
L Galea (on 8/8/08)
Beach encroachments and permits to put tables and chairs outside should all be revoked.

Beaches are public property for use by everyone not to be given to some blue-eyed boys to make money from.

Pavements are supposed to be for people to walk safely on, not for restauranteurs and hotels to use as part of their property.

Let's get public property back to the public not to private operators.
A. Camilleri (on 8/8/08)
Allow me to take this opportunity to add my opinion on similar problems, but in Malta. Have the authorities checked the apparent abuse by kiosk owners/managers who seem to add on any number of tables/chairs as they themselves deem necessary at any stage? Both on the Qawra/Bugibba promenade, as well as on the beach area below Fra Ben, there would seem to be abuse by the catering establishment as well as the 'beach' sunshade/sunbed owner. They have simply taken over the areas. It is unfortunate, but only regular checks by the authorities might get such abuses under control. Get this control going immediately, please.
MARK MIFSUD BONNICI (on 8/8/08)
what about the sun beds awaiting to be rented left all day on the beach . Are these covered by a permit? And if indeed they are, is the operator not meant to provide only those renting a sun bed with one.

Why should twenty or more beds be left on the beach, which already is too small to accommodate swimmers. The area taken by these sun beds accounts for a third of the area.

The Zebbug local council seems to agree with this practice since so far, following several complaints, it has done nothing about it!!

Also boats regularly enter the swimmers zone with no one in authority ever blinking an eye lid!!

Swimmers at this beach are disgusted at this attitude.

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku