• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Union tells Boffa nurses not to treat cancer patient

The nurses' union has ordered its members at Boffa Hospital to deny treatment to a patient with advanced cancer whom it deems to be a "health hazard".

Stephen Brincat, chairman of the hospital's Oncology Department, has condemned the directive as "totally immoral and outrageous".

"We have some excellent nurses and their work is appreciated, but I have never witnessed such a directive.

"It's unheard of to act against a patient," Prof. Brincat said when contacted.

"Since the directive is completely unethical, I expect the nurses not to obey it on the grounds of their conscience. The union is putting them in an impossible situation," he said.

The directive, which came into force on Monday, also instructs "nursing staff to leave the ward, with the exception of just one member for CPR purposes only" when this patient enters the ward.

In contrast to normal practice, this directive, which also boycotts the hospital's medical administrator, was not made known to the media.

Paul Pace, the president of the Malta Union of Nurses and Midwives, defended the union's stand saying that if the patient was "hazardous" then it was right to deny the patient treatment.

The whole issue revolves around an argument between a nurse and this patient on July 29. The nurse alleged he was verbally harassed while the patient claimed he was threatened, Mr Pace said.

Mr Pace added that the union is upset that the nurse was transferred, via a phone call, to another ward without being given a fair hearing.

"This is unacceptable. I'm not going to go into the merits of whether the patient or the nurse is right in this case. We are against the way things were handled. We want an internal investigation," he said when contacted.

"A nurse can be removed simply because a patient complains. We expected the hospital management to handle this case better, but we were left with no alternative but to issue the directive to safeguard the staff's integrity," he added.

The patient has since been discharged but Prof. Brincat said that due to his advanced stage of cancer, he could return to hospital at any time in an emergency. "What will happen then?" he asked.

Mr Pace, however, is standing his ground and stressed that the directive will not be lifted unless the nurse is returned to his ward.

John Cachia, director general health care services, said the nurse was temporarily relocated to another ward within Boffa Hospital as a precautionary measure.

The hospital's medical administration took the necessary action following allegations by the patient and a nurse about each other.

"The first steps included filing all the reports. The police were informed. This is in line with previous measures agreed with MUMN in similar circumstances, in other hospitals, when staff members are under police investigation," Dr Cachia said.

"The Health Division cannot understand the union's reaction... The union directives are putting unnecessary pressure on nurses who know that their first obligation is towards the patient."

The union should weigh its responsibilities carefully when it directs its members to abandon a patient who calls at the ward for the necessary care, Dr Cachia said.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

DVella (on 13/8/08)
Ah, at last . . . a REAL NURSE that understands the essence of this vocation . . . too bad the pillocks in the union that ordered this directive (and the ones that choose to follow it) don't have the mental capacity to think like him!
Thomas Dimech (on 11/8/08)
I am the ex-vice president of MUMN for two terms. It is always a wrong, and bad directive to tell nurses to deny patients from treatment . I am no longer a member of MUMN, and we issued alot of directives during my times but we NEVER denied patients from treatment.

Mr Pace you are wrong, you know me and I advise you to lift the directive and use other diplomatic and measures to reach your goal. The patient is NEVER to be put in the line of fire.

To all the nurses I appeal to consider the ill effects of this directive and help the patients with all the ways possible

Thomas Dimech
Lara Boffa (on 10/8/08)
Shameful and simply unacceptable.

What kind of nurses' union do us Maltese have? It embarrasses me to be Maltese.
Pierre Cacciottolo (on 9/8/08)
@ Paul Gauci -

HEAR HEAR!!

I couldn't agree more!
Paul Gauci (on 9/8/08)
I will become a Nurse in a few weeks. I believe that this is not the way how to tackle such a situation. The union should have asked the management to provide security personnel in that particular ward.

This directive is not solving the problem, its putting more stress on the other nurses and is creating animosity between nurses and the public.

Apart from this its totally unethical not to provide treatment to a patient. A different approach which is both ethical and safe for the staff should be found.
alfred agius (on 8/8/08)
JM - it was never my intention to attack nuns - You misinterpreted my comments. If everyone abandons this patient, I am confident that the nuns will be the last to look the other way .

I have sent a letter to His Grace bringing this sad case to his attention I `ll gladly leave a copy with the editor of this paper should you be interested to know its contents and my sincere interest in the case.I prefer to assure myself that the patient continues to receive spiritual attention if he so wishes rather than assume that he is getting it. The directive makes it difficult being of service to this patient, including the spiritual directors . I have requested the archbishop to ensure that the spiritual needs of this patient will continue to be addressed in spite of any resentment from hospital staff who consider the patient a health hazard - contact by anyone with the patientundermines the stand being taken on the strength of the directive.

I believe the care and attention of religious and trained nursing sisters should be the last and only hope in case of of total abandonment of the patient by hospital staff.


r chircop (on 8/8/08)
A few months ago this same nurse had an insident with an Nursing aid and this nursing aid was transfered to another ward. Where were you Mr pace when this incident happened. Why didn't you take a similar action to protect this nursing aid. Are you strong with those who are terminally ill. Why did you refuse my wife's desperate attempt to solve this crize Why did you cut the line? I know that my days are counted but I am urging my wife to take legal action against you. Shame on you and whoever backs you. You are happy to see me in such a state 'as my condition is deteriorating and I may need urgent treatment to ease my pain.
R chircop (on 8/8/08)
Refering to what has been written so far as regards this incident,
I categorically deny that I have verbally abused a nurse. In fact I was physically abused and threatened. Ignoring such an ugly incident I still feel sustain that the majority of nurses at Boffa are considerate and dedicated. Still I have witnessed aggresive language towards very ill immates during my stays at the hospital.
D Theuma (on 8/8/08)
'The whole issue revolves around an argument between a nurse and this patient on July 29. The nurse alleged he was verbally harassed while the patient claimed he was threatened, Mr Pace said.' i would love to know how this nurse would feel if she was diagnosed with a terminal illness and told that any day can be her last day... and she has to go through hell till the day arrives. I'm sure she would be in a jolly mood. if she couldnt handle the pressure of dealing with sick people she shouldn't be working in a hospital which caters for the sickest of people, many of whom go back time and time again for continous treatment.

My mother is currently going through sessions of chemotherapy and she is definetly not the person that she was before she had cancer and the horrible side effects that come with the treatment. I think we should all be compasionate when dealing with people with cancer as only they can really know what hell they go through.
P. Caruana (on 8/8/08)
The Union should stress for police assitance while this patient is being treated without the need of ignoring him. On the other hand, if the Hospital authorities do not comply, I would look for other alternatives. The patient has the right for treatment, whatsoever. He's human after all. Who's perfect in this world? Are you Mr Pace?
George Curmi (on 8/8/08)
@ Mr. Paul Pace

Downright despicable. Have you no shame?

If you are a practicing nurse (you Mr. Pace), you should be fired as well as any nurse that follows your directive. You remind me of another "president" - Victor Spiteri with a similar bent of conscience - you two make a fine pair.

It is often said that "What goes around, comes around", which is roughly the equivalent of the old Maltese saying "Alla ma jhallasx bin-nhar ta' Sibt." God willing, you'll get your comeuppance. We all live under the same sun. Who knows? You might be in need of compassion some time in the future when you or a relative are visited by a devastating disease. It would be poetic justice for you to be on the receiving end of the kind of treatment you have meted out to this poor man.
Joseph Mizzi (on 8/8/08)
How very humane,Mr Pace. Other comments utterly superfluous
John Micallef (on 8/8/08)
ALFRED AGIUS - MY COMMENT WAS AGAINST YOUR ATTACK AGAINST NUNS' RELIGIOUS ORDERS AND NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE PATIENT IN QUESTION.
ALSO, I'M MORE THAN SURE THAT THE SERVICE OF ASSISTING PRIESTS IS ACCOMPLISHED WITH SUPER DEDICATION BY THE BRETHREN OF THE FRANCISCAN CAPUCHIN FRIARS.
b. galea (on 8/8/08)
it is true that the said patient is sick and i feel sorry for him, but he is sane and he knows what he is doing.why dedicated nurses like those at boffa hospital where sometimes they try to do the impossible to help patients (i know from experience) be treated in such an agressive way. the nurses deserve better treatment from the administration and patient.
Pierre Cacciottolo (on 8/8/08)
Isn't the with-holding of treatment to a patient, by a nurse, technically a breach of Employment contract, & therefore a dismissable offence?

Perhaps Nurses would do well to consider whether Mr Pace truly has their BEST interests at heart!

Further, WHO will he lead, when ALL nurses follow his directive & are subsequently fired?

Sounds to me like you've shot yourself in the foot, Mr Pace!
Paul Savona (on 8/8/08)
This is crazy.

Yes, nurses deserve respect as they are trusted to take on a big responsibility.

This man has advanced cancer, maybe he is bitter about the fact he is going to die before his time.

I cannot believe that Pace actually admitted that he will lift the sanction when the Nurse is moved back to the ward. Basically he is playing with a mans life to make a point.

I hope the family of the cancer patient sue Pace personally for making such an unethical and potentially life threatening decision.

There is NO justification to refuse care, never. More so that it was only verbal abuse. Even if the patient was wrong, you cannot know his state of mind and this is when compassion kicks in. I am not saying it is easy for any person to ignore verbal abuse and I know I could not do the job the nurses are doing, but outright sanctioning care is a disgusting decision.
Noel Cutajar (on 8/8/08)
Shall we ask the Union to put down the patient because of his aggressiveness...is it not a denial for treatment against human rights? Whether there are personal issues, the patient has still to be treated...so if in the hypothetical stance the patient is admitted unconscious in an emergency, he would not be treated because of this directive?? This is utterly rubbish and I hope that family members of this patient would sue the Union for breach of human rights - under article 2 of the convention....Imagine the police would not investigate a murder because the deceased was a criminal...
alfred agius (on 8/8/08)
John Micallef / Jeremy J Camilleri - This patient requires the attention of a qualified person and not that of a volunteer with no training to give the attention and care he requires. It is evident that you both seem to have reasons of your own to ignore this patient`s plight and be left to die the kind of death you certainly do not want yourself to pass through.
Your sarcasm has not offered any help or solution to the patient. In the absence of care from hospital staff ,an appeal to sisters of religious orders qualified in nursing to following the example of Mother Teresa of Culcatta is considered as `anti-catholic venom` You also failed to respond to the question whether the hospital confessor should or should not abandon the spiritual needs of this patient !

I stand by what I wrote and tomorrow will personally implore the Archbishop to intervene in this unfortunate case which has failed to touch the hearts of the likes of you .
An Cachia (on 8/8/08)
No nurse should be subjected to this kind of directive. I for one would ignore it and I am a nurse by profession. Once in a while you may find the odd nurse patient relationship that goes wrong. Even though I do not agree with the hospital management's decision to move the nurse in question without being given the benefit of the doubt, if the situation reported is true to facts, it does not mean that a patient has to suffer. Everyone has a right to care no matter who they are and how they behave. That is the foundation of all health care professions. If the union cannot see that then they are representing the wrong profession.
A.Saliba (on 7/8/08)
Everyone is misleading this article, the accident was that the patient tried to hurt the nurse involved and the union wanted something to be done about the patient not patient(s).
C. Psaila (on 7/8/08)
I totally agree with A. Attard. It is unethical to decide whom to care for inspite of his illness. Besides how can we call a patient hazardous. At this day and time anyone might be hazardous or have a relative who may be hazardous. Arent nurses capable of taking necessary precautions. Besides nurses from Boffa hospital had gone abroad to be trained to look after cancer patients or are standards not yet met within the hospital!!
Antoinette Attard (on 7/8/08)
I just cannot understand how anyone can expect that a patient is not treated. According to the maltese nurses code of ethics nurses cannot take industrial action without ensuring that no harm comes to patients. How can this be done if patients are not treated at all? the union should have made sure that if and when a patient is aggresive nurses have necessary support. whilst its important that nurses are working in a safe enviroment, this would not be acheived by not treating one particlar patient. it will ony lead to more patients being angered and becoming aggresive.
francis agius (on 7/8/08)

The direciive to nurses had to be something like:-

"Nurses must treat this patient, only in the presence of hospital superintendent or his deputy"
John Azzopardi (on 7/8/08)
So the employer is guilty of transgression because they moved an employee from one are to another! Who is employing whom??? Unions have got far too much power! Any employer has the right to move an employee to any area as long as the move does not impact the employee's remuneration. What a joke this country has become!
K Fiorini (on 7/8/08)
Totally agree with you Ray, this is just immoral...Mr Pace should step into the patient's shoes then speak up...
Ray Farrugia (on 7/8/08)
I ask Mr pace what he would have felt if it had been his son or his mother. He should resign from his job, let alone the union's presidency..a shame to his profession.
p Schembri (on 7/8/08)
When I thought I heard and seen it all I get pulled back to reality by such an action and directive. If a patient is to be refused treatment and care in a hospital, than those who work in this institution should be looking for other less interactive work with others, cause one never knows who might be infected and with what..! To the Union that issued such a directive get your head out of the sand bucket and face reality, cause as it was already mentioned that patient might one day be you or a member of your family. To the nurses, it might be the time to review your position and even consider a change of career path if this is offensive to you as a CARE GIVER. To the patient I say that considering you do depend on the care of these nurses, one should be thankful no matter what, the position might not be what you asked for but God passed this unfortunate situation to you, not the nurses or Doctors.
Tanja Cilia (on 7/8/08)
Is this patient stricken with Ebola, besides cancer? Is he radioactive? Is he one weeping sore? In which way, exactly, is he a "health hazard"?
I, too, have seen the off-hand (to the point of cruelty) way some of the people who have taken the Hippocratic Oath treat patients who have advanced metastatic cancer.
But, again, I have seen others bend over backwards to alleivate discomfort and pain.
Each life is a constant stream of chocies; let's not mould them to our own agendas.
John Camilleri (on 7/8/08)
By way of clarification, Mr Alfred Agius' FIRST comment was purely anti-Catholic-venom against Nuns' Religious Orders and Congregations! In his second comment He seems to switch roles from Dr Jekyll to Mr Hyde...!!!
Jeremy J Camilleri (on 7/8/08)
Dear Alfred Agius..

Seeing that you're so Christian...why haven't you already rushed off to the hospital to help out as a volunteer?

Of course....if you can't read this, I understand..Petrhaps you're already there and have no computer access....
John Micallef (on 7/8/08)
Dear Mr Alfred Agius - I have my doubts on the way you decide to reason out things and twist your words accordingly!!! In my previous argument I was just showing you how arrogant and insulting and outrageous your comments were, towards the respective religious orders and congregations you decided to vomit your Anti-Catholic-Venom on! I can't understand why and how you decide to be so much inconsistent in your statements. I invite you to get to know yourself better and for honesty's and integrity's sake and to be less judgmental! May I bring to your attention the words of Our Saviour Jesus Christ when He adviced us to be as pure as doves but likewise to be as witty as snakes! At times you give the impression to be more Catholic than the Pope! I hold nothing against you as a person but I categorically condemn your FIRST COMMENT. Ad nauseam! May you find internal peace before you depart from this world Mr Agius. Peace.
richard galea (on 7/8/08)
In his last hour before a patient departs,what he needs is love charismatic caressment and dignity.
andrew caruana (on 7/8/08)
the union commitee that issued this directive better be carefull because it would be time for them that they will be "health hazard".
Gabriella Apap Bologna (on 7/8/08)
On the same grounds should the nurses working in casualty and most wards refuse to treat patients? God knows the amount of abuse they receive! May I remind Mr Pace that a patient with terminal cancer is very likely to have brain metastases and as a result may not have full mental control (ask any cancer nurse).

Furthermore, and you can ask anyone who works in hospital (atleast in my time), we are made to sign a contract stating 'biex id-dipartiment jinqeda bik' You have no grounds to complain about a nurse being transfered to a different ward as the contract states you have to do what the dept. of health tells you to do (so long as your salary keeps on coming in!).
J Pace (on 7/8/08)
SInce when does the president of a union can get by with giving such immoral, unethical and outrageous orders??? These things are absolutely not done; Does he understand the full implication of refusing treatment to any patient, let alone terminal patients?? And based on what?? Based on the fact that a nurse was transferred to another ward in the same hospital? I am not getting into who was wrong or right but treatment by nursing staff CANNOT be withheld. Is this his idea of taking a stand???? Disgusting
Mandy Micallef Decesare (on 7/8/08)
All the comments so far have been totally outshone by that of Marisa Spiteri - she was eloquent, empathetic and reasonable. Well done Marisa I totally agree with what you said.
DVella (on 7/8/08)
UTTERLY IMMORAL and absolutely disgusting!! How can anyone call him/herself a real nurse and then refuse treatment to a patient in need of it?? Is this a benchmark for future cases considered to be a 'health hazard' to staff?? To add insult to injury, the attempt to justify this action with references to an issue which is totally separate and unrelated to this poor patient's treatment needs stinks of crass indifference towards patient's needs which are the very foundation of the nursing vocation! Any union that attempts to blackmail government on some separate industrial issue by denying treatment to patients should be legally discredited and forcefully disbanded! Such a mediocre and militant attitude goes against the very meaning of nursing and such people are not fit to call themselves nurses, far less to represent the nursing vocation!
I Laferla (on 7/8/08)
TO Paul Pace: A person might be 'Contagious' and an 'Object' can be 'Hazardous'. This is an immoral directive and you should be ashamed! Imagine that you are becoming more 'Hazardous' in bed.... do you want this directive upon you? Shame on you!
Sergio Galea Vincenti (on 7/8/08)
What is a 'hazardous' patient?
alfred agius (on 7/8/08)
Shame on you Mr John Micallef. How unchristian of you ! People like you prefer to forget the Lord`s Semon on the Mount.
You prefer to see this unhappy patient pass away uncared for and unattended and, by the same arguement and your attitude, not even the hospital confessor is to offer consolation and last rites!! I pray the nuns and the hospital confessor teach you a lesson while living their vocation.
And I wonder what sort of treatment and attitude would you prefer to find if and when you find yourself in the same position as this unfortunate patient. May the good Lord have mercy on us all
Jeremy J Camilleri (on 7/8/08)
My oh my...Doesn't it seem that ALL unions have become the personification of evil recently......

Lets burn effigies in the streets, and introduce an inquisitions union!

Could it be a case of some people at last showing our their faces?
J Farrugia (on 7/8/08)
MUMN, you are knocking on the wrong door. I am very satisfied with the work of the nurses and doctors in our only Hospital. They have a tall order to cope with (there are also bad apples). But through my experience, there are dedicated persons working over there. And they have to be. I know that when a wrong order is given by the Authorities (who do not give a dime what working conditions truly are) such as transferring a nurse without first seeing what the case was all about, the union would certainly want its pound of flesh. But the flesh right now is this immoral order. There are I believe other ways and means how to deal with blinkered authorities, but not at the expense of the sometimes irreverent patients. Patients remain patients and should never be the target of industrial action, because otherwise such industrial actions will be illegal, immoral and irresponsible. There I rest my case. Mr Pace please urge your members to ignore your directive. Fellow nurses, out of your conscience, IGNORE THIS ILLEGAL, IMMORAL AND IRRESPONSIBLE DIRECTIVE. Don' t wait for instructions from your UNION. It's your responsibility.
joanna jibiri (on 7/8/08)
come on how can u order not to treat a patient. especially a cancer patient. do u have any humanity? i wasnt there and im not taking sides but come on u think these patients some times know whats going on. you know how frustrating and saddening it is to be in there. you re scared and lonely. not knowing what the future holds. plus u know very well how unconfortable they feel with all the chimo effects in their body. sometimes it comes naturally to be difficult. so ok we understand some women with pmt being sad and angry but not cancer patients. come on. and to order not to take care of them this is a disgrace im sorry. id like to shake my hands with who gave this order eh piece of crap!
John Micallef (on 7/8/08)
Shame on YOU Alfred Agius! Your so-called "Comment" is very arrogant
and full of hatred! Open your heart Sir, coz life is very short!!!
francois Spiteri (on 7/8/08)
Shame on the union!
Joe Grima (on 7/8/08)
Not at all suprised at the total condemnation of the MUMN's inhuman and irresposible directive. What kind f a Union is this anyway takling it out on an irritable patient and inventing a reason for its actions? Termainally ill patients must be in quite a state knowing that they may soon be separted forever from all the ones they love and who love them. Is it surprising that some may be arrogant even abusive? Comes with the nursing territory. Nurses should be trained to cope with such situations and I am sure they are. I don't have a great deal of experience iof hospitals but I know how dedicated and hard working nurses are and how hard they try to make a patient's existence pleasant and comfortable. The Union should hang its head in shame, withdraw the directive even though the patient has since left the hospital and try to save its egg-besmirched face.
kevin wain (on 7/8/08)
Although nurses have the right to be treated well, by both client and employer, empathy towards patients who are seriously ill is expected from all those who are in the health care profession. This is their vocational duty. I believe that the union, in this case, is not being sensitive towards a patient who is seriously ill and requires all the necessary support from health care professionals. This should put under scrutiny Mr. Pace's position as the president of his respective union. In my opinion, Mr. Pace does not represent the vocational credentials of the profession of which he is supposed to be proud of.
Peter Borg (on 7/8/08)
These unions really ought to be taught a lesson. Its ok to register a dispute and ok to take industrial action (and please remember this is only thanks to the Nats in the past 20 years!) butit is not ok to mess around with hapless victims especially those that are in not as fortunate as the rest of us.

On another note - do yourselves a favour and get some PR advice.....the bus strike and now this are doign nothing to gain sympathy from the public though at least you (nurses) are a noble profession and will always be (deservedly) well respected by the public at large.
G.Micallef (on 7/8/08)
This attitude (of the few) is simply unacceptable, inhuman, unethical,
deplorable, immature, condemnable, outrageous and ultra immoral. Jesus
says: "Give and it will be given to you." (Lk 6:38)
arthur bugelli (on 7/8/08)
STUPID DIRECTIVE.....JUST PLAIN STUPID
Charles Abela (on 7/8/08)
I am taking things for granted...perhaps what follows is actually taking place in Boffa Hospital..but

I think that nowadays it's acceptable to inculde psychologist to help, in staff-patients relations...my view is that things will improve..even under 'normal' circumstances.
Marisa Spiteri (on 7/8/08)
I am the daughter of a cancer patient and have spent six weeks in Boffa Hospital. I can only say that the nurses there are very kind and professional and I would never think that they would obey such a directive. During those six weeks I saw many a thing and not least patients being agressive in their language, but what do you expect from a dying person for whom there is no hope of returning to what he was before. This is something that they did not bring on themselves and I hope that Mr. Pace does not have any relatives or himself for that matter that would cause him shame in the future.
Mr. Pace if you are reading this please reconsider your move and just admit that the directive is too harsh, because remember that only real men admit their mistakes. May the Lord help this patient to be more aware of his doings in the future if he should need to be re admitted again to Boffa hospital.
K. Tanti (on 7/8/08)
Another directive without sense from MUMN. An unetichal and irrisposible directive. Shame on who ordered this directive. Every patient has the right to be treated. This directive was discussed in the MUMN exectuvie? It was unamniomsly? As a member of a MUMN I wish to be informed
SIMEON SULTANA (on 7/8/08)
I can’t believe that such an order was given from the union – obviously who made this order has never suffered from cancer or has never had a family member suffering from cancer otherwise this would have never happened. I sincerely think that who is responsible for all this is out of his/her mind. ONLY the patients and their family will suffer. I am a son who is seeing his mother suffering from cancer and am furious at the union who is now denying treatment to my mother who has only few weeks, to say the most, to live... and like me there are many other families. This will affect the whole country. The only sensitive thing to do is to take back this order.
Keith Grech (on 7/8/08)
Time to crackdown on the Nurses Union. Some days after opening our new hospital the nurses union complained that they are no longer entitled to free meals and now they are denying to treat patients that are seriously ill!!! Unacceptable.
Joseph Agius (on 7/8/08)
I am a health professional and I find the directive unethical, unprofessional and utterly disgusting.
Franco Farrugia (on 7/8/08)
@ M. Bonnic - Indeed, like every other worker - and a vocational worker at that - nurses are to be respected everywhere. But perhaps, one can close an eye when you have in front of you such a seriously-ill person who perhaps is unable to control him/herself, etc ...
But what we are talking here is a total boycott of a particular patient.
I think that the Union should have chosen the road to discussions with the competent authority rather than just issuing a directive which, 'a prima facie', sounds very hard and unkind, and that's putting it mildly.
Of course, none of us are privy to what the story is, exactly, therefore, we cannot judge.
Franco Farrugia (on 7/8/08)
@ Mr alfred agius - We threw them out in the 80s, remember?
richard paul agius (on 7/8/08)

I wonder what the union man would have said if the patient was his own Dad, terminally ill with cancer !!!!
Not to mention the great pain that is associated with this illness!!!!
Joseph Galea (on 7/8/08)
This is insanity by the Union. If the person was 'aggressive' then the Union would be within its rights to request that the administration provide all necessary security but to give a directive - i.e. not to treat a patient - that goes against the basic principle of all medical professionals is not only immoral and unethical but downright stupid!
A Bonnici (on 7/8/08)
@ J Borgie

Radiology dept has nothing to do with nursing. Yes there are professional nurses everywhere but it is difficult to bring them here. Our conditions are not good enough....long working hours...difficulty to get a vacation leave...one weekend out of five off duty and last but not least the salary)

But the fact in this case if I understood it correctly is that an oncology nurse just got transfered from the ward without a proper investigation. You have to keep in mind that to do this one should replace the nurse with another experienced in giving chemotherapy for example. As I said it is a harsh directive but you cannot just treat staff like toys
M. Ellis (on 7/8/08)
While I can understand that at times difficult situations may arise, perhaps nurses and their union had better remember their oath.

"In the full knowledge of the obligations I am undertaking, I
promise to care for the sick with all of the skill and understanding I
possess, without regard to race, color, creed, politics, or social status.
I will respect, at all times, the dignity and religious beliefs of the
patients under my care and holding in confidence all personal
information entrusted to me and refraining from any action which
might endanger life or health."
Philip Camilleri (on 7/8/08)
This directive is nothing but petty behaviour on the part of the nurses. There is no situation that would justify a nurse neglecting his/her professional duties to a patient in such a manner. If there is a threat of violence then security can be made available.
What patient isn't "hazardous"? Dealing with the "hazards" of ill people is what all nurses and doctors do all the time. Both doctors and nurses do regularly face perople who treat them like dirt on their shoe, but that comes with the territory and both nurses and doctors rise above that sort of behavior. I worked on the cancer wards in Boffa hospital for 2 years with many of the nurses who are still there and all were caring and dedicated. This is quite out of character and must point to some underlying issue not divulged to the journalists.
Dr Brincat has all my support. The nursing staff should be ashamed of themselves for neglecting their primary role of care if they walk out of the ward.
J.Borgie (on 7/8/08)
The Union's action is utterly irresponsible and out of proportion and should draw a widespread public comdemnation- though no form of aggression is ever justified it is immoral that cancer patients, who are already carrying a massive burden due to their illness are denied care. Surely there is no place for aggressive nurses and the Authorities should not be expected to be linient in front of such cases simply because of the shortage of nurses - after all there are many professional nurses in the rest of Europe and elsewhere - Boffa hospital is no stranger to this as there are already competent Indian medical at the Radiology Department.
A Bonnici (on 7/8/08)
I can understand that this seems to be heartless, but unfortunately sometimes you also find patients that treat nurses like animals. I am a nurse and I love my job. On work I am dedicated to offer the best holistic care to my patients. But unfortunately sometimes you find people that treat you badly. Come on were is the respect?! It is true that a patient should always be treated even when us nurses are really short staffed and cannot manage all the workload. But please try to understand that you cannot just transfer a nurse from a ward in such a case without hearing the nurse version of facts.
David Wain (on 7/8/08)
This is despicable!! How can he describe the patient as hazardous and then object to the nurse moving ward?

I fully expect nurses to ignore this cruel directive
Anthony Mercieca (on 7/8/08)
Prof Brincat is totally right. The question is more of an ethical/moral issue. The denial of treatment to a terminal ill person, even if there was some tension with the nurse attending the person, means that leading persons have no real assessment of values. I believe that a suffering person may easily transferred his tensions by being aggressive even to those attending him. It might be painful to such, but it is understanable that the sick person is acting under quite some emotional pressure and not in full control of himself. Nurses as qualified personnel are to understand this situation. I too find it a bit naive from the administration to have reacted as the nurses' union when the nurse in question was transferred. In ethics no double negative gets a positive.
Jean Pierre Aquilina (on 7/8/08)
Nursing is a vocation and should be treated as such.
j dimech (on 7/8/08)
Outright shameful. Where is the sense of compassion. This is heartless. This is not industrial action ,this is retribution in its worst form, this is bullying of the weak. I have had the opportunity to experience the immense care, love and devotion that nursing staff at Sir Paul Boffa hospital extend to patients and I'm absolutely sure that such a directive has created turmoil with their consciences. Mr Pace please note that respect is earned only by giving it away. I trust that good sense will prevail.

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku