
Thursday, 7th August 2008
Union tells Boffa nurses not to treat cancer patient
The nurses' union has ordered its members at Boffa Hospital to deny treatment to a patient with advanced cancer whom it deems to be a "health hazard".
Stephen Brincat, chairman of the hospital's Oncology Department, has condemned the directive as "totally immoral and outrageous".
"We have some excellent nurses and their work is appreciated, but I have never witnessed such a directive.
"It's unheard of to act against a patient," Prof. Brincat said when contacted.
"Since the directive is completely unethical, I expect the nurses not to obey it on the grounds of their conscience. The union is putting them in an impossible situation," he said.
The directive, which came into force on Monday, also instructs "nursing staff to leave the ward, with the exception of just one member for CPR purposes only" when this patient enters the ward.
In contrast to normal practice, this directive, which also boycotts the hospital's medical administrator, was not made known to the media.
Paul Pace, the president of the Malta Union of Nurses and Midwives, defended the union's stand saying that if the patient was "hazardous" then it was right to deny the patient treatment.
The whole issue revolves around an argument between a nurse and this patient on July 29. The nurse alleged he was verbally harassed while the patient claimed he was threatened, Mr Pace said.
Mr Pace added that the union is upset that the nurse was transferred, via a phone call, to another ward without being given a fair hearing.
"This is unacceptable. I'm not going to go into the merits of whether the patient or the nurse is right in this case. We are against the way things were handled. We want an internal investigation," he said when contacted.
"A nurse can be removed simply because a patient complains. We expected the hospital management to handle this case better, but we were left with no alternative but to issue the directive to safeguard the staff's integrity," he added.
The patient has since been discharged but Prof. Brincat said that due to his advanced stage of cancer, he could return to hospital at any time in an emergency. "What will happen then?" he asked.
Mr Pace, however, is standing his ground and stressed that the directive will not be lifted unless the nurse is returned to his ward.
John Cachia, director general health care services, said the nurse was temporarily relocated to another ward within Boffa Hospital as a precautionary measure.
The hospital's medical administration took the necessary action following allegations by the patient and a nurse about each other.
"The first steps included filing all the reports. The police were informed. This is in line with previous measures agreed with MUMN in similar circumstances, in other hospitals, when staff members are under police investigation," Dr Cachia said.
"The Health Division cannot understand the union's reaction... The union directives are putting unnecessary pressure on nurses who know that their first obligation is towards the patient."
The union should weigh its responsibilities carefully when it directs its members to abandon a patient who calls at the ward for the necessary care, Dr Cachia said.




RSS
Comments
Mr Pace you are wrong, you know me and I advise you to lift the directive and use other diplomatic and measures to reach your goal. The patient is NEVER to be put in the line of fire.
To all the nurses I appeal to consider the ill effects of this directive and help the patients with all the ways possible
Thomas Dimech
What kind of nurses' union do us Maltese have? It embarrasses me to be Maltese.
HEAR HEAR!!
I couldn't agree more!
This directive is not solving the problem, its putting more stress on the other nurses and is creating animosity between nurses and the public.
Apart from this its totally unethical not to provide treatment to a patient. A different approach which is both ethical and safe for the staff should be found.
I have sent a letter to His Grace bringing this sad case to his attention I `ll gladly leave a copy with the editor of this paper should you be interested to know its contents and my sincere interest in the case.I prefer to assure myself that the patient continues to receive spiritual attention if he so wishes rather than assume that he is getting it. The directive makes it difficult being of service to this patient, including the spiritual directors . I have requested the archbishop to ensure that the spiritual needs of this patient will continue to be addressed in spite of any resentment from hospital staff who consider the patient a health hazard - contact by anyone with the patientundermines the stand being taken on the strength of the directive.
I believe the care and attention of religious and trained nursing sisters should be the last and only hope in case of of total abandonment of the patient by hospital staff.
I categorically deny that I have verbally abused a nurse. In fact I was physically abused and threatened. Ignoring such an ugly incident I still feel sustain that the majority of nurses at Boffa are considerate and dedicated. Still I have witnessed aggresive language towards very ill immates during my stays at the hospital.
My mother is currently going through sessions of chemotherapy and she is definetly not the person that she was before she had cancer and the horrible side effects that come with the treatment. I think we should all be compasionate when dealing with people with cancer as only they can really know what hell they go through.
Downright despicable. Have you no shame?
If you are a practicing nurse (you Mr. Pace), you should be fired as well as any nurse that follows your directive. You remind me of another "president" - Victor Spiteri with a similar bent of conscience - you two make a fine pair.
It is often said that "What goes around, comes around", which is roughly the equivalent of the old Maltese saying "Alla ma jhallasx bin-nhar ta' Sibt." God willing, you'll get your comeuppance. We all live under the same sun. Who knows? You might be in need of compassion some time in the future when you or a relative are visited by a devastating disease. It would be poetic justice for you to be on the receiving end of the kind of treatment you have meted out to this poor man.
ALSO, I'M MORE THAN SURE THAT THE SERVICE OF ASSISTING PRIESTS IS ACCOMPLISHED WITH SUPER DEDICATION BY THE BRETHREN OF THE FRANCISCAN CAPUCHIN FRIARS.
Perhaps Nurses would do well to consider whether Mr Pace truly has their BEST interests at heart!
Further, WHO will he lead, when ALL nurses follow his directive & are subsequently fired?
Sounds to me like you've shot yourself in the foot, Mr Pace!
Yes, nurses deserve respect as they are trusted to take on a big responsibility.
This man has advanced cancer, maybe he is bitter about the fact he is going to die before his time.
I cannot believe that Pace actually admitted that he will lift the sanction when the Nurse is moved back to the ward. Basically he is playing with a mans life to make a point.
I hope the family of the cancer patient sue Pace personally for making such an unethical and potentially life threatening decision.
There is NO justification to refuse care, never. More so that it was only verbal abuse. Even if the patient was wrong, you cannot know his state of mind and this is when compassion kicks in. I am not saying it is easy for any person to ignore verbal abuse and I know I could not do the job the nurses are doing, but outright sanctioning care is a disgusting decision.
Your sarcasm has not offered any help or solution to the patient. In the absence of care from hospital staff ,an appeal to sisters of religious orders qualified in nursing to following the example of Mother Teresa of Culcatta is considered as `anti-catholic venom` You also failed to respond to the question whether the hospital confessor should or should not abandon the spiritual needs of this patient !
I stand by what I wrote and tomorrow will personally implore the Archbishop to intervene in this unfortunate case which has failed to touch the hearts of the likes of you .
The direciive to nurses had to be something like:-
"Nurses must treat this patient, only in the presence of hospital superintendent or his deputy"
I, too, have seen the off-hand (to the point of cruelty) way some of the people who have taken the Hippocratic Oath treat patients who have advanced metastatic cancer.
But, again, I have seen others bend over backwards to alleivate discomfort and pain.
Each life is a constant stream of chocies; let's not mould them to our own agendas.
Seeing that you're so Christian...why haven't you already rushed off to the hospital to help out as a volunteer?
Of course....if you can't read this, I understand..Petrhaps you're already there and have no computer access....
Furthermore, and you can ask anyone who works in hospital (atleast in my time), we are made to sign a contract stating 'biex id-dipartiment jinqeda bik' You have no grounds to complain about a nurse being transfered to a different ward as the contract states you have to do what the dept. of health tells you to do (so long as your salary keeps on coming in!).
You prefer to see this unhappy patient pass away uncared for and unattended and, by the same arguement and your attitude, not even the hospital confessor is to offer consolation and last rites!! I pray the nuns and the hospital confessor teach you a lesson while living their vocation.
And I wonder what sort of treatment and attitude would you prefer to find if and when you find yourself in the same position as this unfortunate patient. May the good Lord have mercy on us all
Lets burn effigies in the streets, and introduce an inquisitions union!
Could it be a case of some people at last showing our their faces?
and full of hatred! Open your heart Sir, coz life is very short!!!
On another note - do yourselves a favour and get some PR advice.....the bus strike and now this are doign nothing to gain sympathy from the public though at least you (nurses) are a noble profession and will always be (deservedly) well respected by the public at large.
deplorable, immature, condemnable, outrageous and ultra immoral. Jesus
says: "Give and it will be given to you." (Lk 6:38)
I think that nowadays it's acceptable to inculde psychologist to help, in staff-patients relations...my view is that things will improve..even under 'normal' circumstances.
Mr. Pace if you are reading this please reconsider your move and just admit that the directive is too harsh, because remember that only real men admit their mistakes. May the Lord help this patient to be more aware of his doings in the future if he should need to be re admitted again to Boffa hospital.
But what we are talking here is a total boycott of a particular patient.
I think that the Union should have chosen the road to discussions with the competent authority rather than just issuing a directive which, 'a prima facie', sounds very hard and unkind, and that's putting it mildly.
Of course, none of us are privy to what the story is, exactly, therefore, we cannot judge.
I wonder what the union man would have said if the patient was his own Dad, terminally ill with cancer !!!!
Not to mention the great pain that is associated with this illness!!!!
Radiology dept has nothing to do with nursing. Yes there are professional nurses everywhere but it is difficult to bring them here. Our conditions are not good enough....long working hours...difficulty to get a vacation leave...one weekend out of five off duty and last but not least the salary)
But the fact in this case if I understood it correctly is that an oncology nurse just got transfered from the ward without a proper investigation. You have to keep in mind that to do this one should replace the nurse with another experienced in giving chemotherapy for example. As I said it is a harsh directive but you cannot just treat staff like toys
"In the full knowledge of the obligations I am undertaking, I
promise to care for the sick with all of the skill and understanding I
possess, without regard to race, color, creed, politics, or social status.
I will respect, at all times, the dignity and religious beliefs of the
patients under my care and holding in confidence all personal
information entrusted to me and refraining from any action which
might endanger life or health."
What patient isn't "hazardous"? Dealing with the "hazards" of ill people is what all nurses and doctors do all the time. Both doctors and nurses do regularly face perople who treat them like dirt on their shoe, but that comes with the territory and both nurses and doctors rise above that sort of behavior. I worked on the cancer wards in Boffa hospital for 2 years with many of the nurses who are still there and all were caring and dedicated. This is quite out of character and must point to some underlying issue not divulged to the journalists.
Dr Brincat has all my support. The nursing staff should be ashamed of themselves for neglecting their primary role of care if they walk out of the ward.
I fully expect nurses to ignore this cruel directive