UPDATE 2: Simshar search called off - Only one VMS contact
(Adds funeral details)
The AFM has called off the search for Theo Bugeja, the 11-year-old boy still missing after the loss of the fishing boat Simshar two weeks ago.
Fishermen called off their search a few days ago and the AFM has now also stopped its search. A helicopter and a patrol boat were searching a wide area west of Malta up to yesterday.
AFM officers headed by Brigadier Carmel Vassallo revealed this afternoon that the Vessel Monitoring System had only recorded one VMS signal from the Simshar after it left Malta on Monday, July 7. That was on Thursday evening. And whereas the VMS normally transmits its signal automatically every two hours, the contact on Thursday was only plotted when the operator in Malta, at the request of a relative of one of the crewmen "pinged" the system - in effect asking it to locate the Simshar. No other VMS signals were received.
The officers said they were confident that the AFM had done all it could to try to locate the Simshar after it was reported missing in the evening of Saturday, July 12.
They confirmed that no debris from the boat has been found. AFM aircraft flew for more than 80 hours on search operations.
Theo's father Simon was the only survivor of the Simshar. The bodies of his Simon's father Karmenu and two other crewmen were found by fishermen. A magisterial inquiry, as well as an inquiry in terms of the Merchant Shipping Act, are currently in progress.
It was announced this evening that the funerals of two of the crewmen of the Simshar will be held this week at Marsaxlokk - Noel Carabott's on Wednesday and Karmenu Bugeja's on Thursday.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Peter Micallef
Jul 30th 2008, 12:40
I cant understand what all the fuss is about on the VMS system, the electronic safety equipment that should be aboard any boat going offshore is an EPIRB ,a SART , and a hand held GMDSS radio all of which are independent of the boat's batteries. Was any of this equipment onboard?
Ramon Casha
Jul 30th 2008, 08:21
The Simshar had a lifeboat which did not inflate. It had a satellite phone which had run out of batteries. It had a VMS which, apparently, had been switched off or was malfunctioning.
The most important question IMO is this: How well-equipped and well-prepared is the rest of the fishing fleet?
The fishermen might have a false sense of security about having a liferaft, but will it inflate when needed? Do they have the means to send out a distress call - independent of the boat batteries - and does it have enough battery power to last it for the entire duration of the fishing trip?
I think it would be a good idea for the fishing organisation to conduct an audit of safety equipment and training.
J Micallef
Jul 29th 2008, 11:51
RIP - our prayers for the dead, our thoughts for the survivors and families.
But: Questions....Questions....Questions....
There are certainly more questions than answers.
Anyhow, the investigation's underway and, if not for our curiosity, at least for justice's sake, and for the sake of not repeating any mistakes in the future, one sure hopes that the truth comes out.
'Nuff said, lest I am (we are) accused of voicing our lack of knowledge on the subject.
Ivan Camilleri
Jul 29th 2008, 01:31
This is what I asked last week. How come the boat could not be tracked by today's technologies??? Questions questions questions!!!
Amanda Mallia
Jul 28th 2008, 21:59
"AFM officers headed by Brigadier Carmel Vassallo revealed this afternoon that the Vessel Monitoring System had only recorded one VMS signal from the Simshar after it left Malta on Monday, July 7. That was on Thursday evening. And whereas the VMS normally transmits its signal automatically every two hours, the contact on Thursday was only plotted when the operator in Malta, at the request of a relative of one of the crewmen "pinged" the system - in effect asking it to locate the Simshar. No other VMS signals were received."
So was the VMS "switched off", assuming that it is at all possible to do so? Or was it simply not functioning in the first place? (In which case, would the system have been able to be "pinged"?)