Higher surcharge to be based on pro rata daily average consumption
If you've gone into a power-saving frenzy after the latest hike in the utilities' surcharge was announced, you'll probably be disappointed to find out that your efforts may be dampened by the way consumption is calculated.
Most households had their electricity meter checked months ago, which means that Enemalta Corporation will not have a reading right before the surcharge went up in a way that would allow it to charge at 95 per cent only the consumption that followed the July 1 announcement.
In fact, according to a spokesman for the Infrastructure Ministry, Enemalta will work on a pro rata daily average based on the actual readings of consumption taken for every household and will allocate the different surcharge rates accordingly.
But this means that if you managed to cut consumption significantly after the new surcharge rate was announced, the tariff will still be levied on the average consumption since your last reading.
When questioned on this point, the ministry simply pointed out that the reduction in consumption would be progressively reflected in the bills, adding that people can communicate their own meter readings to Enemalta, by phone or via internet. The corporation will "take that reading into account" in the workings.
The new surcharge rate, which is almost double what it was previously at 50 per cent, was announced by Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt after he hinted a day earlier that the new rate could hover at around 115 per cent. At the press conference announcing the new rate, the minister pointed out that the government was absorbing the difference by increasing its subsidy to Enemalta.
Asked why the announcement had been made by the ministry rather than by the body tasked with regulating the state-owned energy corporations, the Malta Resources Authority, as happens in other sectors which have monopolies or semi-monopolies, the ministry said that, since rates are levied by Enemalta, it is the corporation which announces its tariffs. It does so after giving notice to the regulator as is normal procedure.
About 30,000 households remain exempt on grounds of their low income. The capping for industry and hotels also remains unchanged. However, the government has announced that it is working on replacing the surcharge with a new tariff system.
When announcing the new higher surcharge, it was estimated that, on average, consumers would be facing increases of between €16 and €250 each time they pay their bill.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
J Micallef
Jul 14th 2008, 15:36
The system used by EneMalta is not against the consumer, and it might actually save us some money.
Most households have their meter read around every six months. This means that the average household would have had its meter read around three months ago.
In April, May and June, most households would not have had their airconditioning systems on for most of the time (neither their heating systems), being spring. July, August and September would be a different story for households with airconditioning.
This means that the 'averaging out' EneMalta will do to estimate how many units of electricity are to be charged at the lower surcharge rate will charge more units than actual at the lower rate.
Thus, the 95% surcharge will really kick in only after the next reading from now. With the averaging done by EneMalta, we are now on a surcharge of roughly 75-80%.
Nigel Lawrence
Jul 14th 2008, 10:53
So, the government is subsidsing Enemalta (our taxes) and capping hotels/industry (our taxes making up the difference). I think it would be a lot cheaper if WE just paid OUR full surcharge up front, without the added surcharge (of which we DO NOT know how much it is costing us, the consumer) of these subsidies. Remember also, that hotels/industries electricity bills are tax deductable items, whereas the consumer does not have that advantage. This is fair?
philip pace
Jul 14th 2008, 09:33
This shows that the old system of meter reading is not fit for today's demands. It is outdated and does not give a clear indication of how much energy one has consumed and hoe much he shall pay for it.
The system of 'renting' the electricity and water makes those meters as the most expensive meters in the world as one is renting and therefore it is never his.
I propose that new devices and methods have to inroduced to the public.
In Belgium if you have paid too much for the energy you are given your money back after a year.
In Great Britain one can buy the electricity from a corner shop. One has a key with a magnetic strip and when he arrives home he installs it into the meter and he is seeing with his own eyes the energy that he has bought and it helps him to save.
Yet in Malta we still have the old system that one 'rents' the meter and waits for the meter reader to come and if not one has to phone with the actual meter readings.
Isn't it about time that a new system has to be indorsed?