Updated: PM suggests committee to discuss ways to strengthen democracy
(Adds reaction by Joseph Muscat)
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi has proposed the setting up of a Parliamentary Select Committee to seek common ground between the government and the opposition on legislative amendments to strengthen democracy.
Dr Gonzi said the committee, made up of three MPs each from the government and the opposition, will discuss the points raised in the recent exchange of correspondence between MLP leader Joseph Muscat and himself.
Speaking in Parliament when he moved a Freedom of Information Bill, the Prime Minister noted that many of the points made by Dr Muscat actually formed part of the government’s legislative programme as explained at the State Opening of Parliament.
In the Address by the President, the government listed among its priorities an improvement of parliamentary procedures and the allocation of more resources to MPs, improving public administration, the appointment of a Special Investigator to work with the Commission Against Corruption, the enactment of a Freedom of Information Act and a Whistleblower Act, strengthening the role of the Ombudsman to coordinate complaints on the administration of the whole public sector, legislation on party funding, an updating of the Electoral Law and measures to restrict the possibility of ministerial conflicts of interest.
Dr Gonzi said progress on some of those points was already being made. The Freedom of Information Act was now before Parliament and the government’s proposals on the Whistleblower’s Act would be announced in the coming weeks.
In the near future the government would also be contacting the opposition over its proposal on strengthening the Ombudsman and giving the Office a coordinating role for complaints covering the whole public sector.
Dr Gonzi said the government would also be implementing other promises relating to public administration, including issuing a public call for appointments to state bodies. This measure could not be implemented immediately for various administrative reasons.
A discussion would also be held shortly on ways to improve the Public Accounts Committee and other structures so that the chairmen of state authorities would be required to appeared before parliamentary committees, thus improving accountability.
Dr Gonzi augured that the proposed Select Committee would, step by step, bring about much needed changes in agreement between the two parties.
He said however that the committee would not be discussing Dr Muscat’s call for a capping of government revenue from excise duties on fuels, since this mechanism did not exist. The committee would also not need to discuss the appointment of the Auditor-General and his deputy since that issue had now been resolved and he had given notice of the relevant motion for the appointments to be made.
It was important, however, that the committee also discussed points he had suggested to the opposition, including parliamentary procedure, pairing and the appointment of the Speaker, Dr Gonzi said.
Labour leader Joseph Muscat in a statement said he had noted the Prime Minister’s remarks and that he had upheld the decisions taken by the opposition. He now awaited a discussion on the terms of reference of the Select Committee
Dr Muscat said that while there was a parliamentary set-up for this debate, the discussion should not be limited to Parliament but also include civil society.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Ramon Casha
Jul 10th 2008, 08:08
@J. Martinelli: First off, if parliament is supposed to take all decisions, why hold referenda?
Second, this is about strengthening democracy in Malta. If everyone agrees that our "democracy" is lacking, and parliament was elected as a result of that flawed quasi-democratic process, how can parliament exclude civil society from the decisions to correct it?
Claude Stivala
Jul 10th 2008, 07:55
@ joe Martinelli
Your comments are so blinkered and biased that you can so easily pass for a Nazzjon or NET tv reporter. If you continue like this you will soon get promoted to the top league of PNGonzi's Apologists where you will join the ABC's and DCG's of this small world.
Joe Martinelli
Jul 9th 2008, 22:38
@ J. Borg
How can you lose something you never had?
For those telling us to understand what the MLP is, Joseph, in a statement said. "Dr Muscat said that while there was a parliamentary set-up for this debate, the discussion should not be limited to Parliament but also include civil society". What is this, another stalling tactic? Who makes decisions, the Parliament or civil society?
Civil society elects its parliament to make decisions on its behalf, so why go back to civil society to make the rules? This amounts to no more than total abdication of responsibility by Joseph (though not elected by civil society) who has been appointed by his party to carry?
It took over a year for the MLP to make a decision regarding the Auditor General. Can one imagine had the MLP been elected to govern, what kind of mess we would have found ourselves in if decisions take that long for them to make?
What is even more disturbing, when they finally coughed it up, they agreed with the Prime Minister's recommendation presented to them in April 2007 - no that not a misprint it was April 2007 !
Marco Borg
Jul 9th 2008, 21:58
I really admire Dr. Gonzi. Every time he sees the chance for open discussion with the opposition he never misses the opportunity. I hope one day we can say the same for the M.L.P. Our nation can only benefit from such outcomes. Well done Dr. Gonzi.
J. Borg
Jul 9th 2008, 20:48
How can the MLPN pretend that they can boost democracy by making the electoral law truly democratic and representative, when they exclude other parties - in particular AD.
Or are they planning to come up again with a hotchpotch that serves only their own party's interest?
I have lost all confidence in GonziPN, but I sincerely hope that Dr. Joseph Muscat really intends to induce the overdue changes and drawing the input of everyone in good faith.
George Calleja
Jul 9th 2008, 20:36
@Joseph Caruana
Try writing in Maltese - maybe we'll understand what you want to say.
Joseph Caruana
Jul 9th 2008, 19:59
Why is Muscat waiting -- for Gonzi to speak that the MLP is 'galleija' when it comes for things that both sides of the room have equal responsibilities? hmm...
P.Schembri
Jul 9th 2008, 19:48
Looks like Joseph Muscat is moving in the right direction. Who accused him of wanting to be on the fence now knows what the MLP is.