Minibus owners consider fitting seatbelts
The authorities are discriminating against us and even using bullying tactics, claims Charles Mercieca.
The Minibus Cooperative is looking into fitting seatbelts in those red minivans which are exempt from having them in place under European Union regulations.
The chairman, Charles Mercieca, said that due to recent media coverage about the lack of seatbelts on a substantial number of minibuses, towards the end of last scholastic year parents had requested schools to hire seatbelt-equipped minivans to transport their children.
More than 50 per cent of the red minivans used on the school run are not equipped with seatbelts but under EU rules they are not obliged to install them as they were manufactured before 1997.
Many parents, however, are under the wrong impression that these vehicles are operating illegally, Mr Mercieca said.
The owners feel something has to be done or they will lose custom come the next scholastic year.
"We are doing something about it not because we are operating illegally but because we do not want to lose market share," Mr Mercieca insisted.
In view of this, the cooperative, which represents around 92 per cent of the 404 red minivans registered in Malta and Gozo, has held discussions with an engineering firm on the possibility of installing seatbelts.
It has also been in contact with a British firm with a view to importing a new set of seats incorporating seatbelts to replace the original ones.
Mr Mercieca complained that minibus owners feel they were being discriminated against by the police and local wardens who regularly stopped them for surprise inspections. They were not as rigid with other means of transport used on the school run such as coaches and route buses, he claimed. Red minivans only transport around 30 per cent of schoolchildren.
He also pointed out that when parents organise car pools, some cars carry as many as five children to school but the authorities turn a blind eye and neither do they stop them to check if the children are wearing seatbelts.
"Come September, when the new scholastic year begins, we will be losing income because we will be transporting fewer children due to the one-to-one rule (one child per seat) and also due to the increasing fuel costs.
"And we are also suffering unfair competition because while we are stopped to ensure that we are abiding by the law, others who also transport schoolchildren are not stopped," he claimed.
"Why only us? The authorities are discriminating against us and even using bullying tactics."
He cited a case of a red minivan once being chased by a traffic policeman who wanted to check if the five schoolchildren on board were wearing seatbelts.
He argued that although drivers in non-exempt minivans are obliged to tell children to wear the seatbelts, they then had to concentrate on driving and not on whether children kept their seatbelts on.
The police denied Mr Mercieca's claims of discrimination and bullying.
"Please note that there is no law regarding the use of seat belts on coaches.
"Also note that the police do not stop only minibuses to check about seat belts but also private cars.
"The police are on our streets to monitor every single traffic offence and are there to offer the best policing services to all the society," a spokesman said.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
john fenech
Jul 7th 2008, 18:16
Mr Mercieca cash flow is your concern safety of the children is our obligation. Beneath is the EU directive. If you know otherwise let us know.
It should be noted that a new directive, Directive 2003/20/EC of the Council and the European Parliament of 8 April 2003 amending Council Directive 91/671/EEC has been adopted and will, when coming into force in Member States, require the use of seat belts, where provided, in all vehicle categories (M1, N1, M2, N2, M3, N3).
There is a long history of EU legislation, relating to the design, fitting and use of restraints for car occupants. The first Directive concerning seat belt anchorage dates back to 1976, closely followed by the adoption of a Directive about the fitting of restraints in 1977.
Directive 91/671/EC was adopted in 1991 and imposes the compulsory use of a restraint in all seats, where fitted, from January 1993. It applies to vehicles of the categories M1 (i.e. private cars) and N1 (light vans), but in the latter case the use of seat belts in the rear seats is not obligatory. It also applies to category M2 vehicles (minibuses, i.e. buses weighing less than 5 tonnes).
Mia Vella
Jul 7th 2008, 17:28
I would love to read how many drivers of private cars actually get a fine for not wearing a seat belt. Being a foreigner I was litterally born with a seatbelt and feel "naked" without it. However everyday I can count more drivers without a seatbelt than drivers with a seatbelt. This also goes for children! Maybe it would be easier for the population to respect the law if the police/warden followed it. Or are they exempt from wearing seatbelts!
Anthony Borg
Jul 7th 2008, 15:40
While fitting seat belts they may also check to see if their indicators work, and the minibus co-op should even consider throwing a highway code book in their glove compartment.
patrick mifsud
Jul 7th 2008, 12:22
i am already paying for their seat belts. the fee went up by 30 euro for each child per term and i have two children. i leave it up to you to make the calculations.
John Azzopardi
Jul 7th 2008, 11:17
It is amazing how the minbus operators put profits above children's safety! They are considering fitting seat belts as otherwise they would lose market share, not to be socially responsible and protect children from injury and worse. Incredible!
G. Parnis England
Jul 7th 2008, 10:11
I would like to congratulate Mr Mercieca's attitude on market share being far more important to him than child safety. Such a commendable example for all those van drivers that he represents.
Jean Pierre Aquilina
Jul 7th 2008, 09:01
The last spokesman's (for the police I presume) comment, that of offering the best policing services to all society, is at odds with the recent events that took place in Paceville. Furthermore, with so few policemen on our roads, I cannot figure out how each traffic incident is being monitored. Or maybe just that - monitored.
Until the police are better equipped, both in terms of resources and training, I am afraid that that what the spokesman said will remain rhetoric.