• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Updated: France launches EU policy to stem illegal immigration

(Adds Maltese reaction)

EU ministers today broadly backed French proposals for a tougher common policy to stem illegal immigration, despite some differences and concerns about accusations of xenophobia from outside the bloc.

In an initial reaction, the Maltese Ministry of Justice and Home Affairs said that Malta considered the proposals very favourably and viewed them as a step in the right direction. However Malta would like to see more on burden sharing between all EU member states not only because Malta, being such a small state, could not be expected to shoulder all the burden associated with an influx of migrants. but also in view of the need for intra-European integration for these people, the spokesman said.

Spain said it was satisfied with changes to the plan France hopes to see adopted by leaders of the 27 European Union states in October, having previously expressed concerns about proposals to ban mass legalisations of illegal immigrants.

"I am satisfied with the changes, it is important to have a common policy on immigration," Spanish Interior Minister Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba told reporters as he and his EU counterparts met in Cannes on the French Riviera to discuss the French plan.

France has made harmonising the bloc's immigration policy a priority of its six-month EU stewardship that began this month. Under its plan, EU states would pledge to boost the fight against illegal migration and expel more illegal migrants, and confirm commitments for a common asylum policy by 2010.

Spain had insisted its 2005 "regularisation" of 700,000 illegal immigrants could not be ruled against the law.

Spanish media reported that Spain and France had reached an agreement on changes to the text during a visit by French Immigration Minister Brice Hortefeux to Madrid on Thursday.

"We have managed to have accepted certain elements of our policy on immigration," Rubalcaba said, without elaborating.

Spain has been concerned about the angry reaction of South American countries, whose leaders have slammed new EU rules that allow authorities to detain illegal immigrants for up to 18 months and ban them from re-entry for up to five years.

Diplomats said some states with more liberal views on migrant workers, like Sweden, wanted the French text broadened to encourage migration to fill whatever skill shortages exist, rather than on the current basis of "highly qualified" workers.

EU officials argue the bloc must get tougher on illegal immigration to convince voters to be more accepting of legal immigrants needed to make up for the bloc's aging population.

France's Hortefeux has said concerns about immigration were one reason Irish voters have rejected the EU reform treaty.

"I think Ireland, given the fact that we, like other European countries, have issues in relation to asylum, we are favourably disposed to the proposals that are on the table," Irish Justice Minister Dermot Ahern told reporters in Cannes.

German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said Berlin agreed with the French proposal. "I don't see a wall around Europe," he said. "We are fighting illegal immigration and we manage legal immigration."

EU Justice Commissioner Jacques Barrot said it was necessary to bring order to migration. "It is necessary to have a Europe that is of course open, but a Europe with rules of the game, a Europe which remains a land of asylum, but which does that in a harmonised manner, generous but also well organised," he said.

Greek Interior Minister Prokopis Pavlopoulos said the aim was not to create a "fortress" Europe, but one with a coherent policy. "With this pact we will arrive at a policy which meets European standards of democracy and civilisation," he said.

The European Commission estimates there are up to 8 million illegal migrants in the bloc. More than 200,000 were arrested in the first half of 2007, and fewer than 90,000 were expelled.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Alfred Farrugia (on 7/7/08)
What happened to the principle of subsidiarity at the EU?

If our authorities are not in a position to persuade the other 26 EU members to share our burden of illegal migration, is it not time for Malta to study Spain’s “regularization process” whereby legal status is granted to certain unauthorized immigrants?

Given that the number of illegal immigrants that arrive in Malta in absolute terms is a fraction of the number of illegal immigrants that transit through Spain, would the 26 EU member States tolerate the entrance of some of the regularized immigrants to their countries from Malta?

http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?id=331

If the EU is too busy to deal with our concerns, we need to take care of them ourselves in the same way that other EU member countries have done in the past, such as Spain!
Sandro Pace (on 7/7/08)
The Irish have spoken. In the ballot. There is a gap between what the EU politicians want and what its citizens want.

On our side, no one can expect that a tiny overpopulated rock can stem, sustain or accomodate this tide. Forever. Closing an eye on this, citing humanitarian obligations, will not go through forever. Blackmailing us or even bullying us, from abroad, is understandably and desirably going to cause a rebellious attitude in the Maltese society.

I am not much a Mintoff fan, but he would not have allowed this to happen, and would have made a better case, vociforously, then those who are today 'managing' us.
Marcel Dingli (on 7/7/08)
Illegal immigrants have at their disposal plasma screens and air conditioners at Hal Far, besides other commodities. Hence the message given to the illegals is clear : Come to Malta and get heaven on earth. No real will to keep them from coming here. On the contrary, making them very welcome.
J.M. Chapelle (on 7/7/08)
@N. Saliba
I agree.
n.saliba (on 7/7/08)
This is too mild. Just talk – no action.

The people of Europe want action NOW. If a fortress Europe is what it takes to stop this, then so be it.
A Camilleri (on 7/7/08)
I am surprised that the only solution that Malta comes up with is burden sharing with other EU countries. If the EU is trying to stem illegal immigration how can Malta expect the EU to take over its unwanted immigrants. What logic is this?

Does it take a genius to comprehend that Malta is expected to seriously tackle its own illegal immigration problem and nip it in the bud. The question here is that Malta has always turned to other nations to help her with its problems and this time is no exception.

Yes, it is unfortunate that Malta is one of the border countries of the EU and is expected to do its share in preventing illegal operations notwithstanding its limited resources. But once we are in the EU we are expected to give, besides taking, assistance.

Poll

Would it be wise of the trade unions to order industrial action over the utility tariffs?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku