• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Health and tertiary education

Reforms can save millions

Millions of euros could be saved if healthcare and tertiary education are reformed, European Union experts have concluded.

Technical economic computations made by EU experts indicate that Malta can save up to three-fifths of its current spending on health care and more than a forth of its budget allocated to tertiary education while securing the same level of results.

In this context, the EU is suggesting to the Maltese authorities to "enhance (the) efficiency and flexibility of public spending, including by accelerating the design and implementation of a comprehensive healthcare reform".

The Malta study forms part of a wide-ranging report on the state of public finances in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) for 2008, drawn up by the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs of the European Commission.

An economic exercise on the healthcare spend, indicated that "input efficiency in Malta is low, amounting to a score of less than 0.4. Put differently, this means that the same level of output could be achieved by reducing expenditure by three-fifths of the current level.

This suggests ample scope for improving efficiency in healthcare expenditure".

The exercise was based on estimates for input efficiency scores along with the respective ranking computed using life-expectancy at birth, infant deaths and standardised deaths as three output measures. Input was measured by per capita public expenditure in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms.

Spending on tertiary education also needs restructuring, according to the Commission's study.

Public spending in primary and secondary education is considered to be very efficient but not the same can be said on tertiary education spending, which primarily includes the University and Mcast.

"At least the same level of output could be achieved with 77 per cent of the present level of expenditure per student, suggesting important scope for improving efficiency at this level of education," the report says.

The EU economists also measured the level of efficiency from the output side or, in other words, compared to the relatively more efficient countries, by how much could tertiary education output in Malta increase if spending was fully efficient.

The output efficiency score for Malta stands at 65 per cent of what it could be if spending was more efficient.

"This implies that, if educational spending was efficient, the tertiary enrolment rate would rise to about 90 per cent instead of the current 59 per cent," the report notes.

Looking at public finances in general, the EU report comments that, despite these gross inefficiencies, Malta is on the right track to achieve a balanced budget by 2010 while the reduction of the general government gross debt is planned to proceed at a satisfactory pace and is expected to fall below the 60 per cent of GDP reference value by 2009.

It warns, however, that, "there are risks to the achievement of the budgetary targets linked to a reliance on volatile tax revenue items in 2008, the envisaged degree of spending restraint, the favourable macroeconomic outlook after 2008 and the lack of information of the underlying measures, in particular as regards the envisaged continued restraint in the public wage bill".

The EU experts also noted that Malta's competitiveness within the euro area may be at risk in the event of a departure from wage moderation in the public sector, which may spill over to the private sector.

Malta has, thus, to be placed at medium-risk where it comes to the long-term stability of public finances, it concludes.

Points to ponder

Malta is invited to:

(i) Pursue further fiscal consolidation as envisaged in the programme so as to reach the medium-term objectives by 2010 and ensure that the debt to-GDP ratio is reduced accordingly, by spelling out the measures supporting the planned consolidation, especially on the expenditure side.

(ii) Enhance the efficiency and flexibility of public spending, including by accelerating the design and implementation of a comprehensive healthcare reform.

Ivan Camilleri Brussels

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Alfred Borg (on 27/6/08)
Free-of-charge / collectively-funded healthcare and education ensure that an individual gets educated and cured regardless of her or his financial status. Experience in other Countries has shown that a system where there's some kind of private insurance being paid by the govt. for those with socio-economic problems is less efficient that the kind of system we have in Malta. Take the USA as a case. The USA is the Country with the highest % of GDP spent on health, even if free healthcare is limited to a small section of society. In 2005, USA spent 15% of GDP on the limited free healthcare provided there. Malta spent 8.4%.

After all, Mater Dei was paid for by the people's taxes, so why should the people now pay to use Mater Dei?

GonziPn pledged that healthcare will remain free.

Not even Mrs Thatcher privatised the NHS........
Nigel Lawrence (on 27/6/08)
All these people who think that they are getting FREE education and FREE health care are living in fantasy land. It's the same argument with subsidies on water/electricity etc. You are STILL paying for it- in two bills instead of one. Governments do NOT give anything for free.
sandra vella (on 26/6/08)
K.Mifsud - the objective of this press report is to condition people as to what is to come. If the gonzipn government starts eroding FREE Healthcare and Tertiary education services it will become a class war all over again with the elite being able to afford these to the detriment of the working class. When one becomes seriously ill the last thing on one's mind would be financial issues. Trust me if gonzipn will introduce fees he will also introduce a mechanism whereby he will not decrease your taxes anyway.

PS. Please supply me with a private insurance company quote that charges just 300 euros annually for health insurance.
K. Mifsud (on 26/6/08)
Ms. Vella, there is no such thing as "FREE HEALTHCARE AND FREE TERTIARY EDUCATION", just like there is no such thing as a free lunch. You still pay for both healthcare and education, but as taxes rather than as direct costs.

If I had to pay €500 a year less in taxes and €300 a year more in compulsory private insurance, I would very gladly take the option. I think so would the majority of the Maltese population, as long as there is also some socially redistributive mechanism involved so that the transfer effect (from rich to poor) of the present system is retained.

It's funny how some people think that 'free' services fall like manna out of the sky, rather than realise that they are paying for them anyway from their own pocket.
sandra vella (on 26/6/08)
All well and good - because anything that the EU says must be divine and unquestionable!
However do not think that we will stand by and make you introduce fees because your excuse would be that the EU is making you introduce them and not gonzipn.
WE STILL WANT FREE HEALTHCARE AND FREE TERTIARY EDUCATION!

PS. Isn't it remarkable that this feature comes with the other feature that Malta's taxes are still 'low' compared to certain EU countries!

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku