
Tuesday, 24th June 2008 - 10:19CET
UPDATED: Muscat takes a PN view of MLP headquarters!
(Adds comments, light moment)
Joseph Muscat has been admiring the view of the MLP headquarters this morning, from the new PN headquarters.
Dr Muscat is being shown around the new PN headquarters, inaugurated last Saturday, by Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi and PN General Secretary Joe Saliba. Dr Muscat is accompanied by deputy leader Toni Abela and general secretary Jason Micallef.
All are accompanied by their spouses.
This is Dr Muscat’s second visit to PN headquarters since his appointment, the first having been a courtesy meeting with Dr Gonzi.
The leaders were in a jovial mood this morning as they toured the various sections of the new headquarters, chatting to the staff.
In the newsroom, Dr Muscat joked that he had it in his mind that no one would ever mentioned him there!
In comments to the press Dr Muscat said politics would henceforth be about confronting ideas without antagonism. "Where there is agreement, we will say so. This is a spirit of serenity which the country needs."
Dr Gonzi thanked the MLP delegation for its visit and augured that they would continue to work together in the national interest, They might not agree on everything, but they agreed that they needed to work for the good of the country, he said.




RSS
Comments
Before advising others to learn some history, you'd better take a refresher course by reading Malta's post-war history to base arguments on factual, historical information rather than baseless, fictitious ones.
It's a myth to state that Labourites had to emigrate in the 60s because there were no jobs for them, having voted Labour. Emigration was rifer during the 50s when Labour was in office (1955-58). This Labour Government was the first to set up a Ministry for Emigration. The first Labour appointee later emigrated to Australia.
Emigration was the safety valve for Malta's fast-growing over-population resulting from the post-war baby boom. Employment opportunities were few; the main employers being the British Services, the Dockyard and the Government. The Dockyard and the British Services were downsizing their labour force as less work was required during peace time. These circumstances weren't due to bad MLP or PN Administrations. Malta was then a colony experiencing the world-wide post-war economic depression with no industrial, tourism or services sectors to employ thousands of unskilled or semi-skilled (mostly illiterate) workers.
Emigration was a necessary evil. Eventually it proved a godsend for having provided thousands of migrants with better prospects for the future.
Your response to my piece was entirely out of context - with no reference made to your glass-fronted/glasshouse gaffe. It is evident you've adopted the JM diplomatic-type of answer when confronted with an embarrassing question. A full-blooded reply on any topic the interviewee wishes to air is given - which is completely unrelated to the topic being discussed !! Specifically speaking, you made a mountain out of a molehill due to your ignorance in failing to distinguish the difference between a glass-fronted building and a glasshouse.
Quoting my original piece is irrelevant to the fact whether one is a PN supporter or not. My original comment was ironically and wittily related to the fact that BOTH Parties do not publish their financial accounts. Hence they cannot be held accountable as regards party financing when enquiries regarding capital expenditures or bank overdrafts are pressed. Which explains why my original tongue-in-cheek comment regarding the Maltese people's reputation for being generous to support needy causes was made.
But be aware that the whole Maltese nation is awaiting Gonzi to deal with certain cases more seriuosly. We can't accept a Prime Minister who respond allegations and address other statements from a TV show!!!!!
"I won't be surprised if Dr. Muscat finds himself as the "Poster Boy" of the PN in the next Election."
At least we have reached a consensus about the pn party not belonging anywhere and speeding up to the left. I think that the pi en supporters should be ashamed of this or else they're too much committed that whatever the party do is holy or blessed from above.
It's a true pity that I can't show you those photos. Unfortunately the pi en was cunning enough to make up Malta' political history, which is another pity. Let's hope that Joseph Muscat will shed a light on the true history and facts, and maybe we will have other local political figureheads offering an apologise on their favourite TV show!!!
Here is aht another socialist had to say about the political spectrum that you keep bringing up. It leads me to believe that you are still living in th long past.
"- Sant conflict was a wholly ideological, poltiical issue .I have said that the conflict was between a Leftist Mintoff and Dr Sant who had moved his Party into the right wing of Maltese politics.-- a position long discarded by the PN."
For your Information those are the words of Joe Grima, former MLP Cabinett Minister.
the PN have been successfully over the years cause it had the abilty to change and adopt to new challenges in the ever changing world.
You write, "apologise to the Maltese for the parties' mistakes, if any, which could have offended anyone in the past."
My friend if Dr. Muscat is sincere, first with himself and secondly with the Maltese public, his apology should be unquantified and the onlu y adequent place to make such a statement is in the House of Representatives.
Nothing less, nothing more will be acceptable of Joe Public
.
As I indicated earliear, the only appropraite place for such apology is The House of Representatives.
@ Mosses Mula
I am also happy with the MLP"s choice of thier new leader. He is a living breathing example of what the PN have done for Malta. I won't be surprised if Dr. Muscat finds himself as the "Poster Boy" of the PN in the next Election.
My intention is not to clear off any blame from my behalf. My persistence reflects the labourites wounds credited to some of the nationalists' disappointing behaviour. As the government is saying that it lacks a strong opposition, the labour party too would want a civil and respecting opponent. In my opinion, certain Nationalist who may seem as a mojority on each block, are annoying the readers while making labourites victims and the pn more disappointing. I have persisted with my comments as I did not defend any statement which could be classified as misinterpretation.
I admit that with your comment you may have inspired me or made me recollect the harsh situation which the pn's hardcore lies in. As you may know I used the term "Nationalists". I don't recognise how (by the simple statement of "Just a little more than the amount the MLP spent to build their own glass-fronted headquarters on the opposite side. The Maltese have a reputation for being generous to support needy causes !!") I could consider you as a pn supporter.
Remember that one does not have to be necessarily a pn supporter to criticise a labour opinion.
I am fully aware of the incidents caused by a very few number of labourites. A Nationalist is the least person who should generalise the whole rival party as their party too should be responsible enough and offer an apology for the damage caused by its supporters. Lets stop fooling around and keep pretending that the pn's hooligans are some sort of martyrs.
I must admit that you keep impressing me!! You wouldn't accept Muscat's apologise on Bondi+ and anywhere he preached, and then you expect Gonzi' statement on Dissett about the Mistra scandal to be appreciated??? If any, the government should immediatley fulfill the pending request of normal citizens who had won against him in the tribunal of injustices. These are still pleading justice which the government seems to deny from them.
Your persistence is admirable - probably in the vain hope that having the last word is tantamount to being publicly exculpated. I totally agree with your view that Nationalists who compare the glass-fronted MLP HQ to a glasshouse should be taught to realise that their outdated views are disgusting and reprehensible. And if this should make your day, I'd say that the new PN HQ is even more glass-fronted than its MLP counterpart. In fact, YOU had previously compared it to a glass boat. Actually, a FIBREglass, glass-bottomed ( to sample delights of marine life) one would be much more realistic !
There existed no ulterior motive behind my choice for describing the MLP HQ. Had I realised that such words have politically-offensive connotations to nit-picking minds, I'd definitely have omitted them.
The first reaction to my reference to the "glass-fronted MLP HQ" came from you. To quote verbatim you wrote:
" Nationalists really impress me - they refer to the Labour HQ as a "glasshouse.............."
If that isn't a case of misinterpretation which you deny, then it's definitely proof of your rushing to the conclusion and not knowing that "glass-fronted" and "glasshouse" are not synonymous !!
Dr. Muscat's apology is empty and hollow. I, for one, expect Dr. Muscat that the first statement that he utters out of his mouth ones he takes his seat in Parlaiment is to offer such an apology. Any any apology from D. Muscat on behalf of the MLP should be unconditional.
Quote - Let's hope that this new establishment (the new PN HQ) will not encounter any other harsh situations similar to those SET UP by the Nationalists in the 1980s !!!! - R Spagnol
Mr AGC, R. Spagnol must be referring to the attacks on the PN HQ during the decadent Socialist era allegedly carried out by Nationalists disguised as Labourites who did so in order to shift the blame on innocent MLP hooligans and thugs. Probably when Joseph Muscat apologised for these unfortunate incidents in the name of his Party, he also did so on behalf of these pseudo-Labourites !!!! Pleases remember that according to Mintoff, The Times establishment was totally gutted by a bunch of hot heads on Black Monday (15th October 1979).
Before you start with your annoying routine of mud slinging and you speciality of victimization, you must recollect the so-called "accidents" in Zebbug and in any other locality in Malta where Nationalists caused danger and trouble.
I appreciate your admission that my description of the MLP HQ as "glass-fronted" IS AS IT REALLY IS. I also welcome your declaration that YOU went a step further to remind readers that another deragatory term is used by the majority of Nationalists in this respect (any proof?). I have my own views about equating glass frontages to claims of political transparency, but I'd rather not go into that matter.
I wonder how you have accused me of having made a sarcastic statement when you yourself admitted that "glass-fronted" as used by myself means what it really is. I was only making a fuss about something you deliberately and knowingly chose to misinterpret for your own ends. I never attempted to put the blame on others, but always insisted that the blame lay squarely with the sole culprit whom I have always addressed.
.....Mr.Cutajar taking in consideration that the total majority of the bloggers here aren't blind i don't think anyone needs your infinite wisdom and intelligent observation of the fact that I have a double barrel surname of which ,may I state, I am very proud........very much like Debono Grech, Sciberras trigona, Attard Montalto, ellul Bonici, Mifsud bonnici and all the rest..................but I guess being the master of objectivity, unbias and political balance Mr.Cutajar thinks that if you have a double barrel and you're Nationalist then you're a "kiesah" and "pepe" and "tridha"..............just goes to show the very sad mentality of some die hard labourites!!!...........but thanks for calling me "friend" it does soften the prejudice one, little, teeny bit!!
There is nothing worst than for one to give advise and not to head his own advice at the same time.
The fact that I mention part of some nationalists' ignorance when dealing with the labour party about their headquarters, means that I was responding to your previous sarcastic statement??? You chose to mention it as "glass-fronted" as it really is but I went a step further from your opinion and reminded the viewers what really is the term used by the majority of the Nationalists. That's all! You're now making a fuss on silly arguments and trying to push on your blame onto others who solely wanted to add certain information about the headquarters. If you read carefully through my first thought, the keyword of the statement is TRANSPARENCY.
Others tried to insult or ridicule this fact while still avoiding to comment/respond on other more serious issues. Lets focus on maturity and not onto sarcasm. I think that everybody knows how the mlp headquarters looks and therefore nobody need somebody trying to hide behind a brick wall to describe it for them.....
I quote - "Mind your language,it's how many Euro not how much Euros" Half wrong yourself, it should "be how many euros" not "how many Euro", lowwercase e and s for plural unless not on a trans member official document. Not nly is this correct english it is also specified by the EU!
Most of the contents of your last blog are irrelevant to our argument and will be disregarded. I had described the MLP HQ as being "glass-fronted". Certainly nothing deragatory about that !!
You yourself admitted having used the term "glasshouse" - which I didn't use - as being the deragatory term allegedly used by Nationalists to describe the MLP HQ. You stubbornly won't admit that my "glass-fronted" description is totally alien to your implied "glasshouse" one.
If you happen to be a nit-picking type who easily takes offence by claiming that a strong sense of arrogance, vulgarity and insolence were conveyed by my "glass-fronted" description, I pity you. There's no point in pursuing the argument further because I've come up against a brick wall.
In these circumstances, I'd agree with Charles Buttigieg's wise decision. I respect Mr. Buttigieg as a decent, level-headed and moderate opinionist even though I don't always share his views. In this case, some blogs, as witnessed, have been debased not solely to a personal level, but worse. One has to be constantly on one's guard to check every word used because it is clear that some words carry politically-offensive connotations to nit-pickers.
Well done Dr. J Muscat keep up the good work.
I agree completely with you...criticism and mudslinging are two words that people like our two barreled friend - AGC does not distinguish.
I am very sorry to say that those who are still picking on silly arguments, were not comfortable enough to answer my questions and doubts regarding the present government where comes more sensible issues. Finally I may not associate myself with such childish attitudes while I send my congratulations to the pn party for its magnificent new home. Lets hope altogether that this new establishment will not encounter any other harsh situations similar to those set up by the Nationalist in the 80's!!!!!
I believe it is the blood sucking Socialist Linches and not the conservatives that come out with "silly:, " immature", "venom", "jealously" statement and so on.
With all due respect I do not believe you have read the blogs below. Who have brought the issue of how much it cost and who have paid for it.
Micheal Catania, go and have a coffee, and then comment.
.....but maybe thats what makes Malta such a pleasant place to live in...wonders never cease!!
Can you tell what you mean by the following;"they refer to the Labour Headquarters as a "glasshouse". The intention of the structure of the CNL is to reflect transparency."
Transperency, up my A**. The MLP doesn't now where trasperency starts or ends.
.Our HQ is bigger and nicer than yours, glasshouse not glass-fronted........God give me strength, let’s grow up.
On another note, it is refreshing to see Joseph Muscat on good terms with Lawrence Gonzi. I wonder how long it will last, Joseph has a good head on his shoulder and he is intelligent enough to not let himself be blinded by the hot air generated by these conservative rabble.
.....now read some of the blogs below......................just a pile of venom from people who wish they've lived in the middle ages just to be able to burn the Nationalists at stake...........
...prosit Joe......The new HQ is really beautiful and fitting of Malta's biggest (whether by a mile or a centimetre!!) Political Party....Thanks for the 2 victories and a referendum victory also....thanks for all your time, dedication and hardwork.........
..........and thanks to JOSEPH MUSCAT who at least has the decency, unlike some of you bloggers here, to appretiate what his opponent has suceeded in doing....................JOSEPH MUSCAT is in his Political Spring....GONZI in his seat and most of you here in the coldest and worst of their Winters...........
A typical comment from PN sympathises who view Labour sympathisers as children of a lesser God! Don't you know that the "professional job" done by the PN in re-building their headquarters has been done by Labour in 1994-1995. Did anybody say that wasn't a professional job indeed! From demolition to inauguration it was finished in just 2 years and finished in time for the 1996 general election.
There's no need to get so hot under the collar just because I used the adjective "glass-fronted" to describe the MLP headquarters. First of all, this is not intended as a deragatory term but simply as a description. I can assure you that I can see perfectly; I'm well aware that the new NP headquarters ALSO has a glass front.
Unfortunately, Mr Spagnol cannot SEE the difference between a "glasshouse" and "glass-fronted headquarters". I recommend he looks up the words in a dictionary for his own information and tuition because they are two different types of buildings. I will leave comments about the glass boat to other bloggers because I don't comment on banalities.
Mr Gauci, no disrespect or child talk is intended by using the adjective "glass-fronted". It means any building having a glass front, just like the PN headquarters and other modern structures have been provided with to facilitate the provision of light.
So according to your theory of idealism which you gave to R.Cefai, what should be the explanation for the street-Nationalists and party's exponents in favour of Sant keeping his appointment in the labour party?????
Honesty, accountability, transparency, Malta’s interest…..my foot!
As I have written in many blogs, a strong opposition is good for the PN. A strong opposition doesn't leave any room for complacency on behalf of the Governing Party.
The PN is not afraid to fight an election based on ideas.
If you do not want others to offend your intelligence, then do not offend others' intelligence by that kind of question.
Just a little more than the amount the MLP spent to build their own glass-fronted headquarters on the opposite side. The Maltese have a reputation for being generous to support needy causes !!
How much € Euros were spend on the New Headquarters of the PN ?
Tony