• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

We must keep moving on

The Irish have cast their vote and, as we all know, they have rejected the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. This is a decision that may well have disastrous consequences if we don't find a solution and send a clear message that Europe is serious about reform.

Without in any way dismissing the importance of the message that the Irish voters wanted to convey, one must not forget that this vote was characterised by great apathy considering the low turnout and the fact that the debate in Ireland was dominated by issues that had nothing to do with the treaty itself. Adding to this, Joseph Daul, speaking as chairman of the EPP, said that "A dishonest campaign was carried out to create confusion and doubt. Untruths about taxation, neutrality and other issues destroyed all attempts at a normal informative campaign".

The result is a setback for all those who have the interests of the European Union at heart. It was an opportunity to have more transparency in EU decision-making. It was a step forward in achieving more political effectiveness and, so, a stronger democracy. But not all is lost. Both France and Germany have urged the EU to press ahead with the project. Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen said that that the EU must help to find a solution on how to move forward after Ireland's vote.

Taking into consideration and, as a clear example, the eurozone, we are already experiencing a two-speed Europe and, so far, this has proven to work in harmony. One must stress the fact that this project is now in its tenth year and it has reaped benefits for both parties on either side.

A country joins the eurozone only when it deems it right and is ready to accept the rules that govern this economic zone and, moreover, is ready economically. With Slovakia joining on January 1, 2009, we will have 16 countries in the eurozone and 11 that are still not members. No one will force these countries to join unless they are ready. Therefore, no one should force the Irish to ratify something they are not comfortable with.

If economically we already have a two-speed Europe, I can see no reason why we should not adopt the two-speed principle in other sectors.

"We must not forget that the European Union has experienced crises and times of difficulty several times before and, today, as in the past, we must keep a cool head to find the best solution, Hans-Gert Poettering, president of the European Parliament, told Parliament earlier this week. I agree and the rejection of the treaty text by one EU country cannot mean that the ratifications by 18 EU member states become null and without effect.

The European Parliament has made it clear that the Irish government, together with its European partners, will now be required to make proposals as to how to proceed from here. The meeting of the heads of state and government to be held next week in Brussels will have to address the situation after the Irish vote and will offer the Irish government an opportunity to take stock and put forward proposals. Like the majority of my colleagues in the European Parliament from nearly all political groups, I sincerely hope that the reforms can still happen before the 2009 Euro elections.

I fully agree with Deputy Prime Minister Tonio Borg in trying to overcome this hurdle while taking the Irish on board.

José Manuel Barroso commented that "The no vote in Ireland has not solved the problems which the Lisbon Treaty is designed to solve. The European Commission believes the remaining ratifications should continue to take their course. The treaty is not dead. I believe the treaty is alive". That too is food for thought. We must identify the common areas and strengthen them while at the same time try and bridge the divide on issues we don't agree upon. No problem is insurmountable; this Union of Nations has repeatedly proven that, through dialogue, one can go a long way.

All our eyes are now on Belgium, The Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Italy, Spain, Cyprus, Sweden and Britain. These countries should be putting the treaty to the vote in their respective Parliaments in the near future. It is only after this process is completed that we should make the necessary decisions that will affect the livelihood of about 500 million European citizens. As Mahatma Ghandi famously said: "I am sure that once again we will surmount this wave."

Mr Casa is a Nationalist member of the European Parliament.

david.casa@europarl.europa.eu, www.davidcasa.eu

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Alfred Farrugia (on 19/6/08)
The Lisbon Treaty seems to be better than the Constitution Treaty, but it is not good enough especially on qualified majority. Can Mr. David Casa explain whether Malta agrees with the Czech and Polish declarations (53 and 61) on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, and why Malta did not associate itself with them? Did Malta seek any opt-out concessions, apart from the spelling of the euro (declaration 58)? Let us not be blinded by a sixth seat at the European Parliament. There will be periods of 5 years when Malta will not have a Commissioner!

What would have been the tone of this article if instead of Ireland, it were Malta that had voted against? Would we have been treated as the French and the Dutch who voted against the proposed Constitution? The sixth seat does not compensate for what Malta stands to lose if the Treaty comes into force the way it is. The Irish vote might be a blessing in disguise. Malta’s national interests can be completely ignored when a decision is reached by 55% of the Member States, representing 55% of the EU population from 2017! What shall we do then, withdraw?
John Spiteri (on 19/6/08)
Yes sure. the way eurocrats always have - by showing contempt to popular will. And Mr. Casa get you fact rights, the irish turnout wasn't low indeed it was very high by their standards, nearly 20% higher than when the irish had to vote a second time (cause people like you don't take no for an answer) and approved Nice. And oh yes, the other 500 million that you speak of are still waiting for the chance to express themselves on the matter. that includes us Maltese, which if the times poll is anything to go by would reject it out of hand. the EU is turning into an EUSSR, and if it forges ahead with its anti-democratic and cynical manouvers, i sense trouble - serious trouble down the line. people are like springs, you can push them but at some point they will recoil...

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku