
Tuesday, 6th May 2008 - 13:28CET
Driver denies screening porn film in school bus
A 25 year old driver this morning pleaded not guilty to screening a pornographic film in a school bus full of children.
Defence counsel Anglu Farrugia told a court that the driver, whose name cannot be published by court order to protect the children, did not know what was on the DVD, which the children had asked him to screen.
Dr Farrugia said there was no bad intention on the part of the driver .
The incident allegedly happened yesterday as the bus was being driven between Gudja, Ghaxaq and Sta Lucija. The children, all girls who attend St Monica School, Gzira, were aged between nine and 14.
The driver was granted bail on a personal guarantee of €5,000 and banned from approaching the school.







RSS
Comments
Lets just say that i'll be glad if the bus driver is truely innocent.It wouldn't be very nice to hear that it was really his video and he intentionally wanted to screen it on a bus full of children.
With this kind of attitude people are already scaring away volunteers in scouting , football club nurseries , tal-Muzew and other voluntary organisations , I have already heard of two cases of valid leaders who are pondering to leave their organisation fearing this attitude.
How many parents are ready to register their names on a list of parents who leave their children unsupervised on the computer or watching TV?
He has still not been proved guilty. Given the accusation, I agree that his name should not be made public. What if he's innocent? Wouldh't that accusation be harmful for him?
And why a sex offenders' registser? To 'protect our children' or for other, darker, intentions?
I smell hypocrisy here, anyway.
A good opinion is one which is made when all facts are out from all parties involved, that is, the suspect, victims and the courts!
However, in this case, the only evidence the public has about the case are the facts about the driver's arraignment. As a result, how can anyone judge a person without knowing the details of the case? It is at the point where the court passes its judgement on a case that the suspect is found innocent or guilty. I therefore think that all the "experts" who have posted a comment on this forum should reserve their opinions as real cases are no melodramas that are up for gossip but a system by which hopefully the guilty are punished and the innocent are let free.
Good opinions are ones which are made after the suspects, victims, witnesses and experts have compiled statements which help the court decide on an appropriate judgement.
Wait for the verdict before hanging this man.
I will wait to see the court verdict on this case.
I was a pupil in a private school and one of the girls had a thing for a particular priest who taught us Religion at the time.
She use to sit in the front desk showing him all her given assets and asking questions,that I today would be embarrassed to ask!!!BTW she was thirteen.
I am not saying that the girls and/or driver and guilty or innocent but this is not the same as the previous sex abuse case.
Until and unless this man is convicted, he is presumed innocent. Yet does anyone here think that society will treat him as presumed-innocent if his name is revealed? Out of five responses (at the time of writing), four seem to assume that the driver is guilty.
Call me pedantic, but I still think the verdict should precede the sentence.
With regards to the previous comments, I also believe that it is about time that Malta too had its sex offenders register.
Why is it that the adult is always protected and the children aren't? I would like to know when are we going to take these incidents seriously?
Malta should start a register of sex offenders and people like this driver (upon conviction) should be the first ones to go on that list and never ever again be allowed anywhere near ANY kids.
Bill Millam
Los Angeles
When are we ever going to learn?