Whither ADT?

My letter (November 17, 2007) raised the aspect of certain anomalies in speed control and speed cameras.

I have waited for a decent period, even more so due to the recent general election. After more than five months it is now obvious that ADT does not have the intention to comment about my remarks.

The reason for such silence could be either of sheer arrogance or because they know that my comments struck home.

I shall therefore remind ADT and the minister responsible, that speed control is to minimise accidents and not to raise funds for the local councils. Therefore I shall comment:

a. If it is true that a speed camera will reduce accidents, how is it that in long roads (say the Żebbuġ road) there is only one camera? In such a road there should be at least three cameras to control speed. As it is, drivers have a habit of effecting sharp braking and then, soon after, fast acceleration. Does ADT consider this to be safety on the roads?

b. Commercial vehicles constantly exceed the maximum speed limit of 60 kmh, and do this with impunity because the cameras do not distinguish between different types of vehicles.

c. Heavy vehicles, and inexperienced drivers, have the tendency to hug the centre of the road or the outer lane which forces other drivers to undertake, with all the consequences involved.

I suggest that instead of, or in conjunction with, speed cameras, certain roads should be under constant surveillance of security cameras.

These would ensure that all driving is done according to the rules.

d. It seems that every other vehicle has faulty lights. The biennial VRT tests are not enough and mobile traffic patrols should be introduced.

e. Local councils require income, but this should not be by underhand methods. If ADT feels that 70 kmh is the ideal maximum speed, then it should re-issue the Highway Code. How can ADT justify a lower speed limit in new and good roads, but give its blessing when roads are not fit to drive on? Will ADT have the decency to reply and comment? Would the minister(s) responsible examine the above points and perhaps even call a public conference?