• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Policeman 'tried to save' Nicholas Azzopardi

A policeman was slightly injured trying "to save Nicholas Azzopardi from jumping off a wall", police sources told The Times, adding a new twist to the mystery shrouding the death of the 38-year-old.

The officer, who was escorting Mr Azzopardi, was treated in hospital for scratches on his forearms and chest injuries "which the doctor confirmed were exactly compatible with somebody trying to hold onto someone hanging from a wall", the sources said yesterday.

Before he died on April 22, Mr Azzopardi confided in his family and the magistrate that he had been brutally beaten by police and thrown off the bastions.

The story began on the afternoon of April 8 when Mr Azzopardi was called in for questioning at the police headquarters in Floriana on family issues.

He recounted how he was taunted and beaten in the lock-up by two policemen, but also admitted that he retaliated against one of the interrogators by crushing him against the lock-up's metal door. In turn, an officer, possibly trained in martial arts, flung a side kick, breaking four ribs and puncturing his lung.

The victim told his family he lost consciousness and only fully came to his senses 13 days later in hospital.

Police sources deny Mr Azzopardi was ever pushed or beaten.

Nonetheless, this fresh information marks a new development, especially since the role of the officer said to have tried to save Mr Azzopardi was never mentioned by the police to date, officially or otherwise.

The statement released on April 9 by the police said that Mr Azzopardi "managed to escape from the police who was escorting him and tried to run away by jumping to the other side, where there is the trade school".

The police informed the family of these developments by calling in Mr Azzopardi's brother, Reno, to the headquarters.

Reno Azzopardi recounted at a press conference how when he got there, Police Inspector Louise Calleja, "in a trembling voice", informed him that his brother had fallen off the bastions after he escaped police custody, "hurting a policeman" in the process.

Was a policeman injured in a scuffle with Mr Azzopardi or did he get hurt trying to save him? Did Mr Azzopardi try to escape?

"No policeman was ever beaten by Nicholas. The policeman who was with him actually tried to stop him from falling off," the sources said.

The sources explained that on April 9 the police needed to search Mr Azzopardi's car. As they were crossing what is known as the CID yard, the officers realised that the victim's wife was waiting in the reception area of the CID.

"In a bid to avoid a confrontation, one of the officers went to address his wife. Another policeman went to the back with Mr Azzopardi, while his wife was admitted to the offices," the sources said.

"CCTV footage shows Nicholas walking on his own, but the shadow of the escorting police, who was at a distance, is visible. Mr Azzopardi was not held in handcuffs, there was no reason for that.

"The camera then shows Nicholas peering over the wall and walking further up along this wall."

The camera footage stops there. The sources said that Mr Azzopardi then "suddenly pounced on the wall" and that is when the policeman intervened and tried to prevent him from jumping.

"The policeman managed to cling on to him. But while Nicholas was a big boy this officer was a weed next to him. He never got a beating.On the contrary, when he tried to hold on to him he scratched his forearms and chest against the wall.

"The police was trying to prevent him from falling off. Unfortunately, there was no choice but to let Nicholas go - it was either that or the two of them would have tumbled down the bastions," the sources said.

As days pass and new information surfaces, the story becomes increasingly puzzling. While the family is standing by the story Mr Azzopardi told them on his deathbed, police sources question how he could have been beaten when the man spent seven hours in hospital, under two different medical teams, between April 8 and 9.

Police sources have said records exist showing Mr Azzopardi was admitted to hospital twice complaining of chest pains, the second time closely following the first, early in the morning on April 9.

Dr Raphael Fenech Adami, the deceased's lawyer, confirmed the version of facts given by Reno Azzopardi and said the victim had given him the same version of events.

"He (Nicholas) was conscious and said what was reported by the family," Dr Fenech Adami said.

The lawyer stopped short of giving further information, or to give a personal assessment of the testimony, adding that he would rather wait for the outcome of the magisterial inquiry.

Meanwhile, the police too are eagerly awaiting the conclusions of the two ongoing inquiries before making any official comments.

Besides the magisterial inquiry, which began on the day of the fall on Wednesday, April 9, the government on Tuesday ordered another investigation to look into the alleged police beatings.

The original inquiry might take another week and it seemed unlikely to be concluded by the end of the week as the government was initially expecting, sources said yesterday.

Meanwhile, the Chamber of Advocates last night issued a statement calling for an official clarification on the function of the two inquiries, to ensure the process is not duplicated and potentially lead to conflicting conclusions.

"The Chamber notes that (retired) Judge Albert Manche is assigned to conduct a special inquiry into the circumstances of Nicholas Azzopardi's death, while Magistrate Anthony Vella is already conducting a magisterial inquiry into the same incident. It is important that it does not come across that there is a lack of confidence in the judicial process," the chamber said.

However, Justice Minister Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici said when contacted that he had full faith in the magisterial inquiry, but he wanted to ensure that no stone was left unturned in this investigation.

Correction

In a story which appeared yesterday in The Times, entitled I Was Beaten Up At The Depot, in connection with the allegations being made by Nicholas Azzopardi on his deathbed, former Assistant Commissioner Emmanuel Cassar was reported to have assisted the inquiring magistrate when the late Mr Azzopardi was questioned.

It was not Emmanuel Cassar - who is no longer a member of the police force - but Assistant Commissioner Michael Cassar who accompanied the magistrate. The error is regretted.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Albert Gauci Cunningham (1 week, 5 days ago)
It is disgusting how some people have no respect for a dead human being and try to foment political arguments even at this stage.........there is nothing to accuse and nothing to defend at this stage Mr.Charles J Buttigieg......we are neither a judge nor the jury....no newspaper, no coloumnist and no blogger has the right to put the family or the Police Force in a bad light until proven guilty or otherwise..........or are some people so bitter that they are ready to sensationalise and surpass all limits of democratic decency to bash their opponent?? Shame, shame, shame on you!!!!!!
James Portelli (1 week, 5 days ago)
Many questions still linger in my mind...
1) why didn't the interrogation at hospital get recorded word by word ?
2) what benefit could Azzopardi get from inventing all this story ?
3) How qualified was the doctor in consideration ? Is he a forensic expert or a houseman ?

There is no politics involved in this, just questions that need clarification. The whole truth, unfortunately could have only come out if the victim was still alive. Sadly enough this is not the case.
Joseph Ellis (1 week, 6 days ago)
It is a trite silly of Mr Charles J. Buttigieg to divide those who are critical of the manner the Police Corps has handled this tragic incident and those who are not into Labour-leaning and PN sympathisers respectively. This is a serious matter which transcends petty party politics.

On the other hand, Mr Johann Mifsud's conscience is at ease as he is confident that the Police Corps - or rather some elements of it - had no intention of killing anyone. Does this mean that these elements intended to beat the hell out of this guy but not kill him ? And Mr Mifsud should be aware that anyone convicted of child abuse does have rights, let alone someone who is accused of such abuse by a mother who has lost custody of this child.

All should bear in mind that the respect of human rights and democratic liberties is not automatic but has to be safeguarded day in and day out.
Emmanuel Mazzitelli (1 week, 6 days ago)
The sooner the truth is unearthed the better. It will serve good both to the Police force and us the citizens. If there is absolutely no foul play in how the police handled the matter, then the credibility in the police corps will not be dented. If there is some foul play involved then let the culprits pay.
I still find that there are many grey areas that need to be resolved.
Johann Mifsud (2 weeks ago)
I'm sure that the police have no intention to kill anyone, irrelevant of who the person is and on what he/she is being investigated. The only true in this story is that he was being investigated on child abuse.

Charles J Buttigieg (2 weeks ago)
Comments made by Labour leaning individuals are of an accusing nature,those by PN sympathisers are defensive. This was the same situation when the Nardu Debono tragedy was unfolding only the sides were different.What a sorrowful state our country is in!

Having said that during the Nardu Debono's case the accusers were proved right,I suspect this time the final conclusion will be as that of Wilfred Cardona. Sure hope I'm wrong.
john schembri (2 weeks ago)
"what interest has a dying man to lie?" This is hindsight at its best. Let us wait for the results of the investigations .
And there is no comparison to Nardu Debono's case. He was not suspected of planting bombs on the doorsteps of police officers and public officials.
David Battistino (2 weeks ago)
@ Hector Farrugia - Well said I agree with you 100%

jimmy magro (2 weeks ago)
Have the inquiries secured all the footage at the police headquarters and the hospital? Are there any records of what happened, minute by minute, from the time the victim arrived at Police HQ? Can someone explain why a person called to the Depot made to wait for four hours? Has the Police Commissioner suspended the police officers who had the custody of the deceased? Have the inquiries secured the alleged crime scene to collect pieces of evidence, DNA, etc? Or we appoint two legal persons to have a legal report that goes to the shredder as soon as it is handed to the competent authorities?

Something, somewhere there is more to tell !!
Maria Whitehead (2 weeks ago)
justice will always prevail and truth will always surface sooner or later, so why don't we all just give some breathing space for the appropriate investigations rather than try and label people by using political or social agendas. Having said that, I am very curious about how some readers believe a "weed" sized policeman can toss a man of that size over a wall? still trying to figure that one out...
l borg (2 weeks ago)
what interest has a dying man to lie?
escape from the depot?
i heard that story in the eighties about thelate NARDU DEBONO
however by time the truth came out
Hector Farrugia (2 weeks ago)
Let the inquiries take their course or have you already decided instead of those in the know? I have full faith in Commissioner Rizzo. And I know that should there ever be any arrogance on the police side, he will surely weed it out. Let the investigations go on, you faithless lot.
John Schembri (2 weeks ago)
Why would a police officer throw a well built man over a wall, knowing that the area was monitored by Closed circuits cameras.
Police never report that a person attempted suicide , they report that he fell. The officer who was duty bound to take care that he would not escape probably never expected this to happen .
Interrogations should be done in a more transparent way , it seems that we never learn from past mistakes.
James Sultana (2 weeks, 1 day ago)
Why was this part of the story - that a policeman got injured trying to save the victim from jumping - only made public now ?

What was the reason not to mention it earlier ?

Why, if not at that time, it took a couple of days after the victim`s parents press briefing to discover that inside the police force there is a policeman who has got doctor-certified bruises from that incident ? Weren`t these on record beforehand ?

Did the victim run away on his own and jump immediately ? If yes how could someone try to stop him from jumping ?

Why were we first given the impression that he victim "was found" in the ditch below ? If someone tried to save him, then there was no need to "find him" .... it was a known fact that he was in the ditch, no ?
Joseph Ellis (2 weeks, 1 day ago)
The Police Commissioner refuses to comment on the case as there are two pending inquiries when he should have called an internal inquiry from day one and informed his minister of what had happened. Then, however, the legendary unnamed sources leak information to particular media. Obviously, these leaks are intended to spin this tragic circumstance in a manner which dispels any responsibility on any member of the Police Corps.

Thus, we were told that this poor man was being investigated on child abuse, as if such persons do not have any rights but we were not told that he had won full custody of his child from his estranged wife.

Why did the Police Corps not give its side of the story from day one in order to dispel any suspicion ? The conduct of the Police Corps in this particular event has given rise to serious concern by the public at large and the government did the right thing in appointing an official inquiry to investigate all the circumstances of this case. One would, for example, like to know why Mrs Azzopardi happened to be at the CID yard at the same time as her husband was under arrest.

The inquiring magistrate will look at this tragic case to see whether criminal charges can be brought against anyone but the official inquiry will presumably look at the case from an administrative angle to see whether there may have been systemic failures in the workings of the Police Corps, failures which need not be criminal in nature. Thus, it does make sense to have two separate and different inquiries. However, if the official inquiry brings up shortcomings which are criminal in nature, then, criminal action should be taken against the identified culprits. The report should not be left on a shelf as happened with the Depasquale report on the Safi incidents on which no follow up action was taken in spite of the fact that one soldier was identified as having committed unwarranted violence.

Noel Cutajar (2 weeks, 1 day ago)
...but this is not a movie.
A Bezzina (2 weeks, 1 day ago)
"which the doctor confirmed were exactly compatible with somebody trying to hold onto someone hanging from a wall". Would the scratches on the forearms and chest injuries of the officer be different if he was dangling someone over a wall? I've seen this in the movies.

Poll

Who would you like to win the MLP leadership election?

  • George Abela
  • Evarist Bartolo
  • Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca
  • Michael Falzon
  • Joseph Muscat


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku