• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Illegal immigration

Frontex mission still beached

Malta, Italy, France and Germany are at loggerheads over who should be responsible for illegal immigrants saved in Libya's search and rescue area during the next EU anti-immigration patrol mission, Nautilus III.

Various attempts during the past days by Frontex and the European Commission to launch the mission have failed, The Times has learnt.

"We will be holding a technical meeting early next week to try to get everyone together and solve the outstanding problems.

"However, we can only try to facilitate things where it comes to technical matters. The dispute is also of a political nature and there, we can't intervene," a spokesman for Frontex said yesterday.

Nautilus III - a six-month long anti-immigration EU patrol mission covering the Sicily-Malta-Libya strait, was scheduled to start on April 22 but was postponed at the 11th hour because of a misunderstanding among the participating member states.

Although Frontex refused to specify which member state signalled the problem, it is understood Malta and Italy were behind this last-minute hitch. The mission will involve operations inside the zone designated by the International Maritime Organisation as Libya's SAR area and is likely to lead to the rescue of people who have tried to travel to Europe from Libya as a country of transit.

Because Libya has refused to take back people rescued during Frontex missions, Malta and Italy are arguing they shouldn't become the recipients of all illegal immigrants leaving Libya.

France and Germany, however, are refusing to share the burden. According to Frontex executive director Ilka Laitinen, the international rules on division of responsibility are clear.

"First and foremost it is the country in whose search and rescue area the incident takes place that is responsible," he said.

"In the case where it is not possible for that country to admit these people or it is not willing, the second rule is that it has to be the closest safe haven."

Mr Laitinen said, however, that there is also a political question of fairness, referring to Malta's proposal on burden sharing made last year.

Since June, when the proposal was made, the EU council has made no progress on the issue.

Mr Laitinen added that although it is not Frontex's responsibility to solve the burden sharing issue "we are very clearly dependent on what the policy is and how the different member states interpret their obligations".

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Sabine Mayer (on 6/5/08)
Your SAR area is so big, because it is linked to your Flight information region (FIR). There were proposal already in 2005 to reduce your SAR (and FIR) up to 70%, but the Maltese government did not want to reduce it because you get about 6-8 Mio Euro for FIR-services every year. Malta is paying much less for irregular migration every year...
Graham Crocker (on 3/5/08)
Its simply not fair, for a small country like ours to have such a big search and rescue area.
For it to be our search and rescue zone, it should be ours also for oil exploration and fisheries.

Its only fair, we need the money from oil rand fish to take care of these people.

Ask yourselves, why did they give us such an unfair deal?
Simple, we're small and easy target.

Libya extracts oil from our search and rescue region whereas Italy & Greece control fisheries .

Its Bullying, that's what it is. The big boy, picking on the small boy.
The Europeans, have owned and taken care of land before.
Maltese have never taken care of land (we were never Oppressors) .

Maltese Never marched into Africa, and took thousands of Africans into Slavery and stole their natural resources & land, while creating hell out of a heaven.

They are trying to shift the damage they did to them on us.
It is cowardly, unfair and babyish.
A Agius (on 1/5/08)
Who ever mentiond hunting or birdwatchers in this article.They have nothing to do with illegal immigration.Mr Francica if you want to reason out that those poor souls that come here are only ours, than you must reason out that doves and quails are ours to.All I wanted to say is that we need help and we serouisly need help, not only from those two countries mentioned there but from all EC countries or they want nothing to do to help these poor souls ,they only want to help birds arrive safely to their nesting grounds.
kevin francica (on 1/5/08)
Bird watchers from France and Germany came to Malta to watch over hunters to protect "their" birds, yet they want nothing to do with people - illegal immigrants- that end up here. These poor souls are only OURS; birds that migrate over here are THEIRS !
A Agius (on 1/5/08)
The EC must declare that this problem must be shared with all the members and all the illegal immigrants must be divided among all the members but this looks clear that nobody wants this burden behind his doors.The EC only uses its power against small nations such as Malta when it comes to certain problems,we have no strength against these countries.The one technical thing that is for sure is that summer and the good weather have barely begun and illegal immigrants will come and come in hundreds and no german,french or any other state will hold them only the tiny Malta have to face them with our limited resources.
Joseph Calleja (on 1/5/08)
Since the emigrants are found in Libyan waters, why not let the Libyan's be responsible for the emigrants.....I guess when it comes to territory they only protect their oil rights.

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku