Chamber queries new inquiry into police beating allegations
The Chamber of Advocates has called on the government to clarify why it felt the need to appoint Judge Albert Manche' to hold an inquiry into the death of Nicholas Azzopardi when Magistrate Antonio Vella is conducting a magisterial inquiry into the same case.
Mr Azzopardi's family is alleging that Nicholas Azzopardi died as a result of a beating he suffered at police headquarters. The police have said he tried to escape custody and hurt himself when he jumped over a high wall behind headquarters.
The Chamber in a brief statement said there should not be duplicate processes on the same case because of the potential risk of conflicting conclusions.
It was also important not to give the impression that there was lack of confidence in the judicial process, the Chamber said.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
Updated: Shot migrant in critical...
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
Yana Mintoff: Family speaking to...
Petrol price up 6c
In Discussion
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Antoine Bartolo
May 1st 2008, 07:29
Why should the chamber be worrying about conflicting results? If everyone does their job properly then there should only be one outcome! The chamber's comments can lead someone to think that they believe that individuals leading the inquiries might be either un-professional or worse even un-ethical........
Vanessa-clair Farrugia
Apr 30th 2008, 20:40
Then another inquiry is called, and another, and another, until two inquiries have matching results...
What else?!
P Sultana
Apr 30th 2008, 20:39
I don't quite agree with the Chamber's argument. Let the second investigation serve as a control mechanism on the first. If both investigations give the same result we have the comfort of knowing that the conclusion is probably correct. Disagreement, on the other hand, means that there was a risk of miscarriage of justice.
R. Schembri
Apr 30th 2008, 18:29
Suppose the magisterial inquiry and the judicial inquiry reached different conclusions, what then? Surely the best option is to have just one inquiry to investigate these serious allegations.