Sunday, 27th April 2008 - 13:03CET
George Abela calls for a fair contest
Labour leadership hopeful George Abela today called for a clean leadership contest and said that should he not be elected, he was prepared to work with any leader as long as the contest was fair.
Dr Abela told a public activity in Qormi that the opposition he was finding for his bid was not coming from floaters or the opposition party, but the party machinery and its inner circles.
He said he had not disclosed anything new when he said that the party in 1997 while in government, had been considering a change of policy on the EU. The issue was discussed internally and informally . They had spoken on "convergence" and Dr Sant had written a position paper about it. Evarist Bartolo subsequently wrote two articles, in Maltese and English, about the subject, and The Times had commented editorially.
Dr Abela said the best thing which George Vella (the then foreign minister) could do was to say he was not involved in the talks, but he could not really contradict him, as he had tried doing. Neither could Dr Sant. Indeed, Dr Sant, who had spoken about the matter, should say the whole story, Dr Abela said.
Dr Abela spoke on his plans to make the MLP an inclusive party and the people's natural choice and insisted that the party would not be able to win elections with the same team it had now.
He said that Malta should be a committed member of the EU and said Labour should work for Malta to benefit from the EU while removing the disadvantages which membership could imply. He criticised the government for taking Malta into Partnership for Peace without consultation and criticised the government's offer for the Speaker to be nominated from among the opposition MPs, saying it was aimed at giving the government a two-seat majority in the House.
Dr Abela said the two things which had irked him most so far were (MLP general secretary) Jason Micallef's comments about him as the electoral process was being launched and Dr Sant's comments (where he backed Dr Vella over what happeend in 1997).
He said the leadership contenders were engaged in a clean campaign between them, and others should leave it that way.
He praised MLP Acting Leader Charles Mangion for his conduct.
Dr Abela said his past was a guarantee of success for the MLP's future.
RSS
Comments
Another point on JM's campaign, he said Vote Joseph get Joseph, but with last weeks news that AS is supporting JM, i can imagine that pn's slogan for the next general election would be Vote Joseph get AS!!!
I respect all your comments but, I do not respect those people who make false accusations on what really happened yesterday at Qormi. Oki, know I would like someone to compare in detail both manifestos/visions made by GA and JM - JM's new vision (the list - that offer a stronger finance)? than one can comment on who has the better political views/future for mlp. After I read both visions/manifestos, I prefer GA as our future savior and winning leader as he has a clear idea on how to manage and organize our party.
The times of Malta missed a phrase that GA said, "I am no one's puppet, and I will never be no one's puppet" not like JM who is AS puppet. So, first, it is clear enough that he respects Mintoff opinion but he is not driven away by Mintoff's opinion on how to lead. Secondly, GA made it clear that he is in favour of the EU, but Mintoff, in his short speech, also said that the Republic is being taken away from us from the EU and PfP, so it means that Mintoff is against the EU - oh, he has something in common with AS ideals. So, it is clear enough that both of them does not have the same opinion on how to govern. Mintoff went there only to here what GA had in mind, and not to show that he is influencing GA or any other past relations. On the other hand, GA accepted Mintoff's appearance and did not throw him away/called him a traitor.
I cannot understand why are you blaming GA for defending himself on the past issues. GA does not have anyone to explain what happened in the EU meetings (GV was not present and AS will never admit that these meetings were real) but the only evidence on this matter are the newspapers and Lino Spiteri - but, no comments from Montalto.
Can you please quote page and paragraph in the 1996 Manifesto of the Labour Party where these two points were presented to the electorate? All we had was, repeat, cheap electioneering and blurred statements by Dr. Sant. Even the VAT removal was included in the manifesto and then later the MLP concocted a replacement by the name of CET.
Very simply. Does my friend Mario Sant believes that the favourite contender and well greased by the party machine is any different from the others. According to what we read he formed part of the MLP strategists for the electoral campaign, and unfortunately our party finished on the losing side for the third time running.
If I am gullible enough to believe what I read in the nationalists media, I am not an exception, because the party machine is trying to tip the balance in favour of Muscat by contending that Dr. George Abela is being pushed down our throats by the same Gonzipn media.
Maybe only a straight answer from Muscat will rectify the matter.
If there's anybody suffering from grave paranoia and siege mentaility... it is certainly George Abela.
1) In 1996, both the withdrawal from the PfP and the freezing of the EU membership application were parts of the MLP electoral manifesto - so the people knew what they were voting for.
2) The offer of the speaker's post is being rejected because of the unfair conditions attached to the offer - namely that the one chosen has to be an MLP MP - thus doubling the Government's majority - and other conditions about how and when voting should take place.
as a former MFA president you sure know something about football. You know what an own goal is, don't you?
Seems like it's been Own goal week, doesn't it? First we had Riise (Liverpool), then Lucio (Bayern) .....now you?!
Can't you see that you're destroying your own slim chances with what you're saying? What exactly are you after?
There is no chance this Party will ever get the votes of the floaters. Not a chance.
You hit the nail on it's haid, i agree hundred percent with what you've said. Also I Dr.Abela would like to know how can it be more fair then it is. All the contestants have the same opportunities.
How does one define 'fair'?
Here is one definition: In the unlikely event that Dr Abela is chosen as leader, then the election will be dubbed 'Fair'.
However, when the results come out and somebody other than Dr Abela is declared the new leader, then all hell will break loose and we will be in for a flood of 'analysts' and 'consultants' crying 'Foul!' for all they are worth!
If ever Dr Abela had a slim chance of being elected leader, it seems to me that, by being publicly 'endorsed' by the maverick who voted against his own Government back in 1998, Dr Abela has undoubtedly shot himself in both feet!
What is so upsetting that the government joined the Partnership for Peace without consulting the opposition? Did the MLP in government in 1996 consult the then PN Opposition that it was withdrawing? Same as the freezing of the application to join the E.U. All there was, was Dr. Sant's cheap electioneering about both matters. Dr. Abela was part of the MLP leadership at the time.
Why is the MLP reacting negatively to the offer of the position of speaker? After the election, a number of MLP opinionists claimed that this and the position of President should be offered to the MLP by virtue that it lost the election by 1580 votes. Did Mintoff offer any positions to the PN in 1981 when he took over the government with a minority of votes?