Differing views on the Lourdes Home case (2)

I think that Bondi+ (TVM, April 14) did not deal correctly with the Lourdes Home case.

What I mean is that to live with children or teenagers who may have such needs or may be emotionally disturbed is very trying. It is one thing saying things should be done that way and another thing when you are directly involved.

Did the programme explain that some of the disciplinary measures involving beating took place 20 to 30 years ago? In those days, this was commonplace in many homes. So we are judging past events with present-day yardsticks.

I am not saying that there were some incidents which, even compared to what happened in normal families, exceeded the limit. Why did Mr Bondì not say that if it were not for the Church, many children and teenagers would have ended up much worse?

Not even now does the State have the resources to deal with this problem.

I suggest does a programme on the effects of marital separation on children.

To the Church authorities I ask: are these homes being run by crisis management?

If the nuns and other operators are stretched to the limit, is it not probable that certain things happen?

However, I wish to express my appreciation to all those who work in voluntary organisations in the Church and other NGOs. They are doing sterling work.

However, if they feel they are getting tired, or their motivation is waning, they should slow down or even stop before possibly hurting themselves and others.