• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Megalithic temples can get their protective shelters... finally

An artist's impression of the protective shelters and visitors' centre at the megalithic sites.

Archaeological investigations around the Ħaġar Qim and Mnajdra megalithic temples have been completed, paving the way for works on the protective shelters and visitors' centre to start imminently, Reuben Grima, Heritage Malta's senior curator, prehistoric sites, said.

"Construction work can proceed apace, within days and weeks - not months," he said, adding that the December 2008 deadline would be adhered to despite any delays.

The project had to be completed by the end of the year, he stressed. "We cannot slip on that due to the EU funding, which lists the December 2008 deadline as an obligation," he said, confirming that the project was still on schedule.

It dates back six years to 2002, when the application was first submitted. In 2004 an outline development permit was approved followed by the issue of the permit a year later.

The stage that was reached yesterday was the result of a "lengthy and thorough procedure" while some delay was due to the fact that the Malta Environment and Planning Authority had stopped functioning for a couple of weeks after the election.

Dr Grima was speaking outside the Mepa premises where "reserved matters" on the construction of the visitors' centre, the protective shelter on the megalithic sites and the park facilities, were approved.

The groundwork has been laid - practically literally - and Heritage Malta now has the approval, following a number of "hoops it had to jump through", Dr Grima said. "But the process deserves the time it had taken. We had to be sure and reassure everybody concerned that no stone was left unturned for the best possible solution."

Certain design details were dependent on extensive archaeological excavation that had to be conducted at the sites of the centre and the shelters, Dr Grima explained. The process has been completed and, in the light of the results, minor modifications have been made to the design in close consultation with the Superintendence of Cultural Heritage, which advises Mepa.

The idea was for the foundations of the membrane tent structures to have the least possible impact, he explained.

The development permit had been subjected to a number of reserved matters, which fundamentally consisted of technical details on how the tent structures would be installed and anchored to the ground as well as the foundation levels of the visitors' centre.

On this last point, archaeological investigations indicated that the amount of rock cutting would have exceeded that predicted. The plans were, therefore, amended, resulting in the fact that the visitors' centre, located in the existing car park, has been reduced in volume and its height lowered by a metre, project manager Robert Sant explained.

The "trimming" of the stone allowed for the lowering of the structure's skyline, he said, adding that an approved method statement was adhered to, under the surveillance of the Superintendence of Cultural Heritage.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

J. Borg (on 19/4/08)
We're going to ruin them - especially with the visitors' centre and all
can these (if at all needed be set-up underground - at safe distance - or ringed off by trees.
The proposed cover whilst artistic - will spoil the character and soul of the temples.
have we really sought the advice and direct input of the highest international authorities in this area? after all this is international heritage we have here!
Owen Sant Angelo (on 19/4/08)
This article mentions a lot of concern about the foundations of the tent structures, and nothing at all about the interaction of the temples with the sky and sun which is probably _the_ reason why they even exist in the first place.

From http://www.heritagemalta.org/mnajdratemples.html:

"At the summer solstice (21st June), the rays of the sun light up the edge of a megalith to the left of the doorway, connecting the first pair of chambers to the inner chambers. At the winter solstice (21st December), the same effect can be seen on the corresponding megalith on the right hand side.
On these particular days, the temples are opened to the public at sunrise to view this extraordinary event."

I was lucky enough to view this effect in person during the winter solstice of 2006 - it was a truly magical event that each and every one of us should have the privilege of attending at least once. It has been so for the past 5000 years. Can Dr. Grima re-assure us that we will be able to enjoy it again next year once the 'protective shelters' are up?

Don't get me wrong... I totally agree with preserving this world heritage site for future generations to enjoy.

Perhaps the tent membrane itself will be translucent, or retractable to allow interaction of the site with nature as required? More detail to set our minds at rest please....
Liam Kelly (on 19/4/08)
Dr. Grima has been talking about this for a long time, its about time it actually commenced. Basically, anything to help preserve these stones should be welcomed in my opinion...too much in malta resources are exploited untill its too late, so this SHOULD help, considering it has been benchmarked against similar projects accross europe.

martin saliba (on 18/4/08)
How on earth can this project be finished by December. I am assuming the any digging will be done manualy using picks and shovels. Most people know that heavy machinery cannot be used as these may damage the temples. In fact all quarries that operated in the vicinity of the temples were ordered to stop work a few years ago as it was said that the vibrations emmited by the heavy machinery could cause damage to the temples.
Richard Cachia Zammit (on 18/4/08)
I know very well that visitng these temples once the tent is built won't be the same experience as now and I totally agree that the surrounding is as important as the temples themselves but we cannot overlook the fact that the elements are damaging these temples. No use comparing them with other monuments, you have to consider our climate and our sedimentary rocks. The stones are now being eroded at an alarming rate and something has to be done and the only solution is to protect them from the elements. If this is the best solution, I don't know but definitely something has to be done.
Paul Cachia (on 18/4/08)
This is horrible, that whole temple is designed around the sun, taking the sun and sky out of the picture is equivalent to climbing up a tall building to get a better view only to find no window to look out from. Instead why don't we protect them from vandals by building a guarded perimeter around them as opposed to this obscenity. Those stones have been exposed to the elements for thousands of years, their only threat is vandals not the sun or rain.


Luciano Micallef (on 18/4/08)
The submitted artist's impression for the Megalithic temples reminds me of a project suitable for NASA. It has completely obliterated the visual experience of the temples, suffocating its soul and removing its magic. We might conserve the stones, but none of its true spirit. In compensation we have shifted the impact on the visitor's centre.
John Mizzi (on 18/4/08)
Is Stonehenge covered? Are we going crazy? These sacred places where built so the ancients could keep track of astronomical bodies which in turn on certain occations they used them to make rituals. If covered how can we study and enjoy them like our forefathers did? A recent study at Stonehenge showed that the ancients believed that these stones they carried there had healing properties. The temple sites could also be a special places that might be under a spring or special rocks that might be still creating some natural energies that could have benefited the people. This could also apply to our temples and if we disturb them too much we will loose their amazing magic. Once enough science is applied not just archaeology to understand why these temples where built on these special places we will be possibly very surprised.

So in short we need to try and restore and maintain them to their original form without much disturbance.

Please do not rape these places for the sake of our future generations, science and tourism!!
Ian Grech (on 18/4/08)
I agree. Covering up is not an issue here.
Adrian Cardona (on 18/4/08)
I can understand the need to protect these monuments, but, to me at least, covering them up is completely ruining their environmental context, which is a huge part of their attraction. Is Stonehenge covered? Is the Colosseum covered? Was this the only possible solution? Is there anyone else who considers this tent as a desecration?

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku