• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

California court jails Maltese man for 36 years

Arnold Schwarzenegger allays prison cruelty fears

A man from Ħamrun, who had been extradited to the US to face charges of defiling a minor over a period of two years, was jailed for 36 years after being found guilty of six of the 20 charges brought against him.

Lewis Muscat, 57, was wanted in California in connection with the defilement of a girl when she was aged between nine and 11.

He was found guilty on four counts of committing lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age and two counts of using force when committing the acts.

He had pleaded no contest and was sentenced on January 17. The no contest plea, while not technically a guilty plea, has the same immediate effect as a confession and is often offered as part of a plea bargain.

The other 14 charges, including the possession of obscene matter of a minor in a sexual act, were dismissed through a plea bargain reached with the District Attorney's Office in California.

The offences took place between June 2003 and November 2005.

Speaking to The Times, Detective Kevin Givens, from the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, said Mr Muscat risked spending 100 years in prison had he not accepted the plea bargain.

Mr Muscat, who lived in the US for 40 years, had been fighting the request for extradition since he was first arraigned in March 2006.

Magistrate Joseph Apap Bologna ordered Mr Muscat's extradition on August 4, 2006, concluding that Mr Muscat "has a clear case to answer in the court of the requesting state".

Mr Muscat then filed an appeal in the Criminal Court asking that his case be referred to a court of constitutional jurisdiction. He argued that his extradition would lead to a breach of his constitutional rights because, if he were sent to the US, he would be subject to torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.

He added that he suffered from mental health problems and was not fit to withstand extradition. The court heard a psychiatrist conclude that Mr Muscat had "normal mental capabilities, like any ordinary man, and is fit to stand trial". The Court of Criminal Appeal, presided over by Chief Justice Vincent De Gaetano, dismissed Mr Muscat's appeal in April last year and ordered that he be remanded in custody pending his return to the US to face charges.

In an effort to make the extradition proceedings smoother, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a declaration to the courts, guaranteeing that the man would not be subject to cruelty while in the Californian state prison.

The declaration was exhibited in court by Senior Counsel to the Republic Donatella Frendo Dimech and Cynthia Scerri Debono together with Police Inspectors Raymond Aquilina and Noel Cutajar during the lengthy constitutional proceedings initiated by Mr Muscat. Lawyer Chris Soler and legal procurator Noel Bianco represented Mr Muscat.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Tania Micallef (on 12/4/08)
The sentences handed out in Malta are ridiculous. As for the Gozo case, I agree that the perpetrators should be punished but so must be all those parents who still feel they have a right to hit their children to discipline them. Unfortunately, in Malta and in many other countries, parents take the easiest route of discipline. It may give short-term results, but the message you are transmitting to the child is that it is all right to hit someone when they annoy you. The child will also feel free to do the misdeed if 'mummy' is not around to catch me out. It's ridiculous - if I slap my neighbour (who might well be bigger and stronger than myself), I'll be taken to court and fined. If I slap my son (who is vulnerable and cannot hit me back), I'm 'doing it for his own good' and I can get away with it, time and again, unless he needs to be hospitalised. Let's not focus on the Gozo case to throw mud and hatred towards the Church, but use it as an eye-opener to change this violent method of chastisement. Those nuns were probably themselves brought up with the mentality of 'spare the rod and spoil the child' - none of them were trained to care for children and gave out what their parents taught them - so much for the 'values' of old we boast about so much.
Noel Cutajar (on 12/4/08)
May I reply to Mr. Borman on this case. I was one of the prosecutors in this case and the person who effected the arrest. The assurance granted by the Governor as any person whether a criminal offender or not does not deserve to be ill-treated for his deeds. Yes, he deserved to be sentenced for life (as he will be 100 when he is out) but that does not give us a right to be public lynchers. I for one spoke on harsher penalties in these cases and no protection should be afforded to the names of any pedo. In the UK and other countries there exists a register of names of sexual offenders which is done to protect the neighbourhood but still one has to move with caution.
Joseph Vella (on 11/4/08)
Our Church leaders should take note.
Well and good maybe the abuse in Lourdes home was not of a sexual act but still the perpetrators are 'scotch free' in Malta because our law sits back when the Church is involved.
Kevin Zammit (on 11/4/08)
Mr. Borman ... granted the irony is not lost, it's a formality and Americans are sticklers for it anyway. It's what makes such a huge country so successfull.

As for the article it simply reported what happened as a good reporter is bound to do.
Kevin Zammit (on 10/4/08)
Granted we need to revise some of the punishment but I'm sure Maltese judges are not happy to see child abusers go free. Let's not be too cynical I'm sure we have have judges that know what they are doing.

Things are different over there. The report did not say anything about parole. California has a 3 strike system, he may be eligible for parole after 10 anyway, that's why he went for the 36 instead of the 100. Why do you think they give a hundred year sentence ... because people live longer in the U.S?

You should see how well the system is working ... crime is on the up and recidivisim has increased because of poor prison systems and overcrowding.

Grass is always greener on the other side of the fence ...
M. Bormann (on 10/4/08)
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/politicalmuscle/2006/09/schwarzenegger__4.html - link from Los Angeles Times of September 23rd '06 - "Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has assured the government of Malta that an accused pedophile will be treated with fairness if he is extradited to the U.S." - I think most will sense the obvious sarcasm and cynical tone of this quote. It's easy to see that we are ridiculed for demanding assurance that this sick pedo is going to be treated humanely. He will be treated like every other criminal in the U.S., which one assumes is humanely. Foreign countries ridicule us, and rightly so - we're still in the 1940s, and they're in 2008.

Chris Vella (on 10/4/08)
Thank you California!

Note to Malta: This is how it is done. Get your priorities straight and straighten up your act !
Maria Dolores Fenech (on 10/4/08)
Thank god he was taken to court in the US and not in Malta where he would certainly have walked away scott free. Our courts should act likewise to protect our children and not the abusers!
Charlie Galea (on 10/4/08)
Maybe the Maltese courts will follow the same example when it comes to handling out punishment to offenders of sexual abuse towards children,
Though the Maltese courts deserve to be congragulated for making this offender face the justice that he deserves.
Anthony Slater (on 10/4/08)
Now that is a proper sentence..

Not like the pathetic wrist-slapping judgements that are pass down to child abusers here in Malta.

Talking of which, when is a Sex Offenders Register going to be implemented in Malta?
simon sullivan (on 10/4/08)
and why do our courts not affect such punishment on sexual offenders (amend the law if necessary). to add insult to injury in Malta we then protect the criminals identity. nonsense....name and shame !
A. Vincenti (on 10/4/08)
This is the law taken seriously. Not like in Malta when we had similar cases and the perpetrators were either left scott free or given lenient sentences. By comparison we reward molestars back here. Which now brings to the attention the recent case in Gozo. The Gozo bishop, now that he has proof that things went badly wrong in an institution there should bring the people to justice and serve (an expected lenient sentence if found guilty by the law courts) and not give them refuge. If this is not done, he is an accomplice to whoever did wrong with the kids.

Poll

Who would you like to win the MLP leadership election?

  • George Abela
  • Evarist Bartolo
  • Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca
  • Michael Falzon
  • Joseph Muscat


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku