
Wednesday, 9th April 2008 - 09:27CET
UPDATED: 28 migrants landed in Malta, second boat being tracked
Twenty-eight African migrants were landed in Malta this morning after their boat was intercepted some 28 miles south east of Malta yesterday evening. The boat was reported by a fisherman and tracked by the AFM until the migrants were transferred to patrol boat P51 and brought to Haywharf, the AFM maritime base.
Meanwhile, informed sources said the AFM is tracking another boat carrying migrants, although this does not appearing to be heading towards Malta.




RSS
Comments
Malta has been exerting pressure for 5 years, but to no avail. Moreover, the EU said that it cannot interfere with what Libya (the departing point) does, let alone intervening in all the countries you are saying.
The EU is taking us for a ride in this matter, and will continue doing so. Always talk, and no action. And it has no jurisdiction forcing member countries to accept our immigrants.
I have already mentioned preventive solutions. Like tracking mother ships, refuelling boats to proceed towards Italy (whatever the relations), pressurising Libya to accept those that left from there as soon as they are rescued (whatever the UNHCR says).
The status quo cannot continue, especially if the EU tightens its controls and continue sending back here those who manage 'to proceed'. Its physically impossible.
Whatever the 'worldwide' condemnations.
In this issue, there are no solutions without casualties.
Those who care for the future of Maltese society should pressurise the govt. to stand up against international bullying.
Although it will now do nothing, as per the electorate's wish.
One can blame colonialism, but as Profs H Frendo said in a Times article on Zimbabwe, it is now a lost case.
It is stupid to think that our govt, is happy with the situation. It simply has no courage to take decisive stances. Which it should.
It is stupid to be naive and accept to be blackmailed by immigrants not telling authorities where they came from. (having something to hide? )
Choosing the simple way out (emigrate) will not help them solve the problem. Unless they suffer their own problems, no efforts will be done to solve them.
To begin with, if Africa is poverty ridden, why make large families? To dump the surplus onto us? How will they learn?
Thinking with the heart in this matter, is not going to be always in our 'harmonious' interest.
The SAR zone (which extends almost to Crete) may have made sense when the Royal Navy was there in strength - now Malta is expected to serve a large area which should be the responsibility of Italy and Greece.
If Dr Gonzi were to bring this up at a serious EU session, the issue would, I'm sure, be recognized. The larger EU countries - UK included - need to address this problem together, rather than leaving it to Malta alone.
While burden-sharing is something we should insist on, arguments such as "Not one illegal immigrant should be granted refugee status", calling their arrival "an invasion", etc. are extreme in my book.
Malta is an active member of the international community and therefore has its obligations, although I agree that it should receive all necessary help to deal with the challenges it faces due to its size.
That is why we have a democracy. AN and IE did not address any other issues seriously no, you are right and I agree.
But for example people like Sandro Pace reasoned that unlike other electoral issues, the consequences are irriversible, therefore he gave this issue priority in the best way he could. I agree with Sandro 100%.
Being a democracy you have a right to do vice versa, i.e consider all the other electoral issues instead of the illegal immigration, and give your vote to MLPN. This means that you were sane enough to realize that neither AN nor IE are fit to be in government (and I agree). But it also means that you were insane enough not to realize the irreversible consequences of illegal immigration. It was about choice, and the people made their choice.
When I saw the election results I said to myself "majority of people clearly do not see the illegal immigration as a fore coming crisis, so why should I be a part of a non significant minority ?"
Right of centre parties like the PN do not want to deprive their capitalist paymasters of the cheap labour they crave, so they make no serious efforts to curtail immigration.
On the other hand, left of Centre parties like the MLP know that once immigrants and their families get the vote, they will overwhelmingly vote left. So left wing parties welcome mass immigration.
The result is that doing nothing to stop immigration is the one important policy on which the PN and the MLP agree.
Citizens who are worried about the mass invasion of their country can only express their concern by voting for clownish no-hopers like AN and IE. Most people refuse to do so -- and so the MLPN duo continues to reign supreme.
And Mr Tabone - did IE or AN seriously address any other issue? That is the real tragedy for if any one of them had a credible program I'm sure they would've fared much better. Unfortunately our bipartisan system leaves few choices - as Norman Lowell himself professed on Bondi+ last Monday.
IE is not an electable party! Its fun watching Lowel argue his views on youtube and Bondi+ but the Maltese gahan simply is not interested in taking him seriously!
AN tackled the illegal immigration issue in their electoral manifesto but they failed to keep focus on this issue alone. AN spoke about all sorts of issues not just illegal immigration, so the problem was that if one voted AN on the issue of illegal immigration then one would also be endorsing their views and proposals on other issues. AN should have kept and strengthened its role as a pressure group on illegal immigration, it would have retained its credibility, strength and appeal. Eventually they would have probably become even electable as a political party but in their first 5 months of existence wanted to replace PNMLP, with policies on all the subjects under the sky.
PN are in Government and they should take a strong stand on illegal immigration, this is what the people of Malta want. As Europe's smallest country we do have a lot of strength if we want to use it. Malta can veto any decision by the EU. Unless the EU helps us out on this issue we should paralyze the EU operation by Vetoing anything that requires voting by Malta - we did loose this chance with the new EU constitution - Poland vetoed this when they wanted to get their way on other issues.
The governement of Malta should rest assured that the Maltese people in their absolute majority will be behind it, if it takes a strong stand on this issue. We simply need to unite as a country putting aside any political differences and take a common much harsher stand.
I am afraid, you are preaching to the converted. And I agree.
Elections are no single-issue matter, but the message to the govt. given by those mere votes is that it is ok to be lenient. And there is no other message.
I gave this issue a priority in my utmost expression of democratic right. Whatever defects those voices had. Cause unlike many other electoral issues, I deem the consequences as irriversible.
One can still be naive and hope for EU 'factual' aid or pressures, and not buying our island to colonise it (with financial aid), politely avoiding the problem.
When enough should be enough, the solutions are only in our hands, ie in Valletta, Castille.
There should come a point where Malta shall no longer be responsible for its 'inactions'. Otherwise the govt. would be failing our society and future generations.
Obligations first and foremost, to the national interest.
Not one single illegal immigrant should be granted refugee status. The refugee Convention is way out of its sell by date.
Whoever intercedes for them should be sent with them to protect them in their own country.
Maltese Government, tell whoever wants us to keep them here to go and tell it to the marines.
The Maltese people are really fed up with them.
What are we waiting for?
A repeat of Briston and Paris?
For Maltese people to take the law in their own hands?
WHAT?
They, like all foreign settlers and workers are taking the work of Maltese persons, lowering wages and the standard of living of Maltese persons.
WE ARE RELAAY AND TRULY FED UP!
And also you have to put weight on the issue. Does the light bulbs promised by the PN, or the reception class promised by the MLP, carry the same weight as the invasion of our country ?
A remedy is clearly called for and unless pressure is made on Libya by the EU or efforts are made to trace the ships which are launching these boats we won't make any headway.
Whilst I appreciate your concern, we might as well start welcoming the immigrants with red carpets and flowers. Only 2 parties in the election showed concern for the problem, which are AN and IE. Together they got 1545 votes.
1545 out of 290799. This simply mean that the rest of the voters, were happy with the other parties who did not mention anything about the problem. Being such a minority who really care about the problem, there is no point to keep on caring. The hypocrisy about the Maltese people is that everyone complains as if Malta is going to sink, but then look at election results !!
As soon as the weather improves and the sea calms down we are literally invaded! and where are we supposed to keep the new migrants?
we should be expecting much more this summer. The governmental should use its voting power to veto and block any EU decision to put pressure on the EU to concretely help and implement burden sharing in the case of illegal immigration.
It is clear that these are off-loaded from some mother-ship. What is being done to track and monitor such ships and not given the chance to dump illegal immigrants where we can pick them?
Every aim should be directed towards these efforts, by force if necessary.
Why is not Frontex an all-year round operation? Simply, we cant have our southern neighbours decide how much african immigrants we should have. Neither our northern one deterring us from taking preventive actions.