• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Updated: Malta must remain neutral, Mifsud Bonnici insists

Former Prime Minister Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici, leader of the Campaign for National Independence (CNI) insisted today that Malta must retain neutrality in the Constitution.

Speaking at a press conference this morning, Dr Mifsud Bonnici said politicians who indicated that the Constitution could be changed should specify their reasons and say the truth.

He did not say who he was referring to.

A few weeks ago, Charles Mangion, acting leader of the Labour Party, said the party was open for “frank” discussions with the government on the Constitution, a comment which was welcomed by Foreign Minister Tonio Borg, who said the government was “all ears”.

Dr Mifsud Bonnici said the government should say the truth, which was that it wanted to have the Constitution amended because the EU Lisbon Treaty, unanimously ratified by Parliament last year, included a clause which laid down that: “If a member state is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other member states shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their powers in accordance with article 51 of the United Nations Charter.” This, he said, was clearly in breach of Malta’s Constiuttion.

When it was pointed out to him that this clause also said that: “This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain member states,” Dr Mifsud Bonnici said Malta had no defence policy and therefore this did not apply.

Dr Mifsud Bonnici said the constitutional clause on neutrality rather than being weakened, actually needed to be strengthened by laying down that Malta would work for general disarmament and the elimination of nuclear weapons.

The former prime minister said Malta also needed to remain non-aligned and should not get closer to the United States. Rather than a cold war, what the world currently had was a real war, with the constant threat of terrorism and the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Michael Catania (on 9/4/08)
Joe Martinelli makes me laugh when he writes that the NP had reservations about all the religious persecutions of Labour supporters in the 1950s. I don,t remember any NP official coming out in support of Free speech,on the contrary they all pussy footed with the then Archbishop. His comments prove what a lot of hypocripts they are.As for KMB a more honest man you will never find. Very much unlike the JPO and Gonzi PN of late.
Joe Vella (on 9/4/08)
A. Daley, if it was not for Dr, George Borg Olivier achieving his goal and negoiated Malta's Independence from Britain, Malta becoming a Republic wouldn't have been possible. Perhaps Malta would have ended under DIRECT British rule as it had happened in 1958.

George Borg Olivier succeeded to make Malta a SOVEREIGN STATE, equal among all powers, without shedding one drop blood. And that is an achievement in itself. That couldn't be said for the large number of countries who fought for their Independence through out history.
A Daley (on 9/4/08)
Joe Martinelli, kindly do not try to change history. If the NP had reservations regarding the mortal sin imposed on the MLP, and MLP delegates being buried in non-consecrated grounds in the sixties, then why did the NP participate in such elections the likes of which only known to have taked place in undemocratic countries. I give you another reason why you are trying to be blatantly ignorant of what happened. You say that NP had no power. Were we not supposed to be independent in 1966? In that election and after the so called independence, the NP had the reigns in it's hands, and could have easily told the church in Malta that what they were doing was antidemocratic and against Christ's teaching. Yet they held elections in most antidemocratic circumstances. Had it been for the Nationalist Party, Malta would still have British soldiers on it's territory and a foreigner as Head of State and that’s after accepting independence as dictated by the British Govt. Even here you are trying to change facts. Mintoff did not sell anything but wanted to be like the British, and his slogan was, (If the British suffer, we suffer, if the British get richer, we get richer as well), in fact if you read the documents of the time you will find that the British realised that this integration was going to be very costly for the UK exchequer, far from selling Malta. Then Gonzi came out scaring people that our religion will turn into Church of England and all the other blatant lies. One could have argued against what Mintoff wanted for Malta, but to try and escape from the responsibility of what happened is tantamount arrogant to say the least. Malta was sold for pittance when the Nationalist Party signed the Independence agreement which gave us 2.5 million in grants for 10 years and 2.5 million in loans from the UK. When Labour was elected in 1971, the Govt. did not even have sufficient funds to pay the Civil Service! Hallina man!
Joe Martinelli (on 9/4/08)
I agree with Sergio. KMB has the right to say what he pleases and we have the same right of not listening to his side of the argument.
Mr. Daley needs reminding that the Nationalist Party had no power nor desire to impose sin over those who read il-Helsien or voted MLP. On the contrary, the NP had its reservations about the action taken by the church since it argued that it was extremely divisive. And right it was otherwise there would not be such a lingering sour taste in the mouths of many such as Mr. Daley's.
As it turned out, however, the failure of Integration which would have sold our sovereignty for a pittance, turned out to be a Godsend.
A Daley (on 9/4/08)
Dear Alex Grima. Dr. Mifsud Bonnici has every right to express himself and whether we agree with him or not, only time will tell as to whether he is right or wrong. Secondly Dr. Mifsud Bonnici has every right to express himself because it was his party, the MLP that fought hard and against all odds, including the British Govt. of the time to bring about the present Republican Constitution that gives the individual the right to say, and believe whatever one wants. Unlike the sixties under Borg Olivier when reading Il-Helsien was a sin, attending MLP meeting was a sin, voting MLP was a sin. The same happened when Mintoff wanted integration with Britain before he asked for INDEPENDENCE in 1958.
Sergio Galea Vincenti (on 9/4/08)
@ Mr Grima:

It is very easy to judge Dr. Mifsud Bonnici based on prejudice and propaganda.

No one can say that he is not an honest Maltese who was cast at the deep end when he was appointed first, Designate Leader (in 1980) and then Leader of the MLP in late 1984.

The truth is that were it not for him, the country could have passed through more dire circumstances and these circumstances would not have been only due to certain elements in the MLP.

In addition to this, few - except those on the inside - knew of what the man managed to do in the period between 1987 and 1992 to deliver the Party to the state whereby the new leader was then able to forge a Party which contested successfully the 1996 elections.

Of course, his position on the EU and neutrality may be argued and disagreed with but no one can say that he does not have the right, the competence or the experience to put his position forward.

He should, indeed, be admired that in this small country of back stabbers and turncoats, we have people like him who are honest and coherent - even though not everyone may agree with them.
Alex Grima (on 9/4/08)
Dear KMB, leave it to the politicians please ... the real ones that is! For the sake of your nation and people, either move on, or stay in the history books ... Personally the history books is exactly where I think you belong, covering a mere page and a half of the most insignificant chapter on Maltese politics!

Poll

Do you think divorce should be introduced in Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku