• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Making good use of taxpayers' money

With reference to the letter Enough Is Enough At The Shipyards by Tony C. Cutajar (March 24) let me try and explain the following:

I am a shipyard worker and have been ever since 1971 and, believe it or not, I am proud to be a shipyard worker, regardless of all that has been said against us.

Obviously, I will never permit people like Mr Cutajar to damage our reputation. It's a pity Mr Cutajar didn't say where he works/worked or maybe he is retired and just living on part of the tax I paid throughout these 37 years.

If, for argument's sake, I earn Lm8,000 a year, the government or, should I say the "taxpayer", would have to fork out Lm700 because the remainder would be coming from foreign currency generated through work carried out in the 'yard.

Now let's look at different sectors on the island and compare them with the 'yard workers.

For example, every policeman, soldier, doctor, teacher, local mayor, beach cleaner, civil servant, member of Parliament (all 69 of them), the President and the First Lady etc are paid from money coming from the "taxpayer" because none of them bring in one single cent (euro) to the island (in foreign currency).

Not to mention all those shops, retail stores, banks, post offices, lotto receivers who only recycle the same money we bring from overseas.

Seeing that Mr Cutajar is so worried about the 'yard being a burden on the country, I ask: Where was he when we (the taxpayers) were forking out Lm120,000 a year to a foreigner who was supposed to be bringing the 'yard on its feet? Now, mind you, don't forget that this foreigner was only responsible for 1,700 people whereas the Prime Minister, who is responsible for the whole nation (400,000), earns a meagre Lm22,000. Does Mr Cutajar know that in the 'yard we still have another three foreigners earning an average Lm70,000 a year each and does he know that the 'yard still employs foreigners whether or not we have anything to do in the 'yard?

If Mr Cutajar is really worried about the "taxpayers" why did he not criticise those responsible for all those foreign consultants this government has appointed?

Does Mr Cutajar know that the government appointed consultants just to supervise the Manwel Dimech Bridge project at a cost of nearly Lm500,000?

So, does Mr Cutajar have any solution should the 'yard close down? And what would happen to the families of the 1,700 workers there, not to mention the families of the nearly 200 agents that deal directly with the 'yard?

Would Mr Cutajar please leave us alone and let us earn our daily bread because the government has enough problems to deal with.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Joe Martinelli (on 5/4/08)
How much Mr. Xerri makes and how much others like soldiers, policemen and even the Prime Minister make, is totally irrelevant.
The problem with the shipyards is not how much the workers and administration earn, it is the lack of efficiency and the lack of cooperation with administration. Mr. Xerri, for example, did not explain why two years ago substantial progress towards eliminating the loss was made, only to be followed the next year with a larger deficit when the value of the contracts had increased.
It is also worth noting that the trades he mentioned and including the parliamentarians not bringing a single cent to the economy is pure hogwash. All are providing a service which, if not there, Mr. Xerri will no doubt be the first to complain and with regards to the PM and the MPs, who does Mr. Xerri think that we should replace them with? As it is someone should put forward a member's bill to double their salaries pronto because MPs on either side put up with much more from their constituents than Mr. Xerri ever has to worry about.
Besides, Mr. Cutajar never mentioned wages - not one single time.
Yes some 1700 families depend on a job at the shipyards, the problem is, it is the 1700 who do not seem to care that much. They should be running after their Union and ask them for a solution even if it means putting an extra effort to make the enterprise more efficient and hence profitable before it is too late.
Mr. Xerri will never make it in the accountancy field and demonstrates so with his calculation that the taxpayer only has to fork out Lm700 out of his Lm8000 annual salary to keep the 'yards going because the rest comes from foreign currency!! Some valid calculation!! Some solution!!
He then quotes fees paid to consultants. Well and good. The problem with that claim is that Mr. Xerri forgets that these fees are a one off expense, built in the price of the project and necessary in every instance.
The subsidies to Mr. Xerri's salary and the rest of the workers at the 'yard are recurring and have been going on for more than three decades and responsible for millions per year not counting on some Lm300 million written off by the government not so many years ago.

(Resubmitted)
Charles Camilleri (on 5/4/08)
Mr Xerri's arguments do not hold water. He cannot compare the yard workers to the police, the doctors, the teachers, etc who are there to offer a service not to make profit. The yard had absolved more than three hundred millions of our taxes and there is a limit to everything.Many private firms who used to earn a lot of foreign currency had to close down when their position became unsustainable. They did not get one cent from the Govt. Why should the yard employees be privileged. After all the trouble with the yard is the outdated work practices resulting in low productivity. The Alitalia Airlines is in the same predicament and unless someone bails it out (which is unlikely giving the intransigence of the unions) it will be declared banckrupt. There is no more place for subsidies in the E.U. Whether we like it or not the yard unless some miracle happens will have to close down and the workers be trained into other jobs possible with European financial help. This has proved to be feasible in the past and i am sure that the dockyard workers will rise to the occasion and grasp the new opportunities offered. Pls Mr. stop dreaming in the past. The time when somebody owe us a living has long been past.
laurie smith (on 5/4/08)
To john grima your daily bread is subsidised, shame on your government.
Shaun Camilleri (on 5/4/08)
Although that the yard workers have quite a bad name, I do agree with Mr. Xerri here. It is true that the ship yards is not Malta's most efficient entity but Maltese families are living on it, and children of maltese families are getting other jobs and paying taxes as well. I can't help comparing it to Illegal immigrants who also work illegaly, pay no taxes, and are more powerful than the police corps.....just because "they're not inferior to us" due to the darker skin...........I think people like Mr. Cutajar should start evaluating everything before rushing letters to the editor!!
Jhn Grima (on 5/4/08)
I quote Mr. Xerri, 'let us earn our daily bread' . The problem is that if you were really earning your daily bread you would not need to be subsidised, you would be generating enough profit to pay all overheads with enough leftover to cover capital expenditure. I believe there are no subsidies paid to the shipyard at the manoel island and yet I am sure it is a profit making business.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku