
Friday, 28th March 2008 - 18:32CET
Gonzi sees time for review of local government
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said today that 15 years since the first local councils were elected, the time had come to review the progress made in local government.
"I believe the time has come to strengthen this experience and translate it into more effective measures for the benefit of society," Dr Gonzi said at the swearing in of councilors elected on March 8.
Dr Gonzi has retained ministerial responsibility for local government within his own portfolio.
He thanked the councillors and candidates who failed to get elected for having presented themselves to serve the people
He stressed that the new government would back the councils and better coordinate with them so that development could take place in a sustainable manner and the people could enjoy a better quality of life.
Dr Gonzi laid stress on accountability and proper financial planning and said the government would seek ways how it could help the councils source more EU funds which they were entitled for.
He said councillors should be well versed in legislation concerning local government and guidance given by the Department of Local Government needed to be followed. Councillors also needed to respect the role, laid down by the law, of their executive secretaries. The secretaries, on the other hand, needed to ensure that they did what was expected of them by law, and nothing more.
The Prime Minister urged those present to allow more space within which young people could come up with new ideas and initiatives.




RSS
Comments
You keep referring to 'Regional Governments' - maybe you are confusing the term. I am referring to Regional Councils - not any higher entities.
Not many years ago in Southwestern Ontario there were a lot (mainly rural) of councils which were amalgamated into a Regional Council. Just imagine the present councils in Malta say in District 1 - Valletta, Hamrun, Floriana, parts of Sta. Venera and part of Pieta. All these areas have respective councils when as you know, these towns are separated by a street. In fact Annunciation Street - one side is Hamrun and the other side is St.Venera!! So, what is wrong by having one larger council headed by one Mayor in charge of the whole district?
As an example -Refuse collection, at present five councils are contracting with with more than one contractor and I am willing to bet a coffee that if this 'super' council had to deal with one contractor, the cost would be lower, it will be more worthwhile for the contractor, in turn he will probably give a much better service because he has more at stake than providing for a much smaller area at present. There is absolutely no reason why it will not work. You may have got the impression that I was talking about another level of council. I was not. What I was leading to is REPLACING the bits and pieces all over the place with a more efficient, larger, better staffed council. I understand that the PM has taken these councils under his wings. Would it not be better and simpler if he had to deal with 13 councils rather than 54?
With reference to New York, are you suggesting that the mayor there has fewer people-area-bureaucracy-services etc to deal with than the whole of Malta and Gozo?
While you stated that this system will not work in Malta, you never explained why.
While this item will soon disappear from this site, I hope that somehow we will maintain contact since I do hope to visit during the Summer.
Joe you cannot compare Malta with that of NY. If I am not mistaken NY still have the same political structure to that of Metropolitan Toronto prior to the City of Toronto Amalgamation. Regional Governments in Ontario have juristication over certain things, like roadways that cross a number of municipalties withen the same Regional Juristication. In Conclustion, regional governments, at least in Ontario, did not replace the local government. Both level of governments have thier responsabilities in certain areas as prescribed by the creator in Ontario's case by the Ontario Legislation. One did not replaced the other.
Believe me, if New York has one mayor and London England has one mayor why would Malta and Gozo need 54?
If there is representation from all the towns within the district, your concern regarding ganging up does not hold water, since all representatives belong to the same council. Besides, I get somewhat annoyed when I hear that 'this will not work in Malta'. Make it work. We have to grow up and we cannot stubbornly cling on an archaic system. Status quo is no longer acceptable - we have to move forward. We have to compete in every aspect and we cannot progress unless we become more efficient.
We have to abandon the island mentality. Yes we are still surrounded by an ocean but we are now an integral part of Europe and please let us shake off our sense of inferiority, roll up our sleeves and get going. Wasting time to make sure we are politically correct to the minutest detail sometimes grinds progress to a halt. We need a steamroller not a pair of skates!
With full cooperation from the Opposition, I think it is about time that a very important reform regarding the local council should be that a date is set, let us say, in the third year of the coming legislature when the election for all the local councils in Malta and Gozo takes place on the same day.
Taking into consideration that every five years as members of the European Union, we now have the elections for the six members which will be representing Malta in the European Parliament, this would mean that :
* in 2009 we will have the Europarliament elections,
* in 2011 we would have the local council elections all on the same day, and
*in 2013 the General Elections.
Going back to the local councils,
this leads to the idea that the local councils term should be extended to five years, in line with the legislature of the National and European parliament. For this to come into effect in some cases it would mean that the term of certain local councils is shortened, while in other cases it is extended. But this would be only an exemption to the rule, till the local council elections mechanism will be geared to the suggested effect.
So if the Government and Opposition still wants to keep the political parties hold on these councils, at least they will spare us the trouble of an ever-ending political run up for the general elections, reflected annually through such local governments.
Regarding the local government, in my opinion, ideally, the best decision will be to leave the local council well of the border of any political interference and all those interested to serve their locality should do so independently, free from any party ties.
But, yes, I must admit that perhaps this is only wishful thinking, though it is not that far-fetched considering there is Department for Local Councils which is sort of responsible for surveying the way, these councils operates and precisely the Prime Minister holding the local councils within his portofolio.