AN disagrees with MLP proposal on persons with disability
Azzjoni Nazzjonali “absolutely disagrees” with the MLP’s idea of housing persons with disability in a restructured St Luke’s Hospital, saying their place was in the community, where they would be taken care of by their families.
AN leader Josie Muscat expressed his firm belief, from years of first-hand experience, that persons with disability could be taught to play their part in society, without being a burden on those who took care of them.
He maintained that it also made more economic sense to help their families, rather than pump millions into another “modern monster”.
According to AN’s manifesto, family members, who took care of dependent elderly relatives, would benefit from an income tax reduction, or rebate, equal to the minimum wage, and would continue to do so once the person in their care died, for the amount of time they were being cared for, though not exceeding three years.
The benefits could be extended to couples, where one was suffering from an illness like multiple sclerosis and had to be looked after by the other, Dr Muscat said.
The idea was to incentivise families to look after their elderly, though he agreed it could give rise to abuse – something AN is totally against.
Whoever dared to abuse would pay a harsh price and would never dare again, setting an example, Dr Muscat said. “Every abuse is a form of theft and what is wrong has to be stopped,” he said of the fact that social benefits have to be reviewed as they have become a burden on society and on the hard-working citizen.
Dr Muscat did not agree that governments should shoulder all responsibility and stressed that AN was against handouts.
At the same time, the country could not be stingy towards persons with disability. Society was obliged to help them even more since they were not to blame for the problems they were born with, he said.
Children with disability had the right to the same educational assistance, meaning facilitators in independent schools should be paid by the government, as in the case of Church and State schools, he said.
AN believed in the government’s principle of subsidiarity, whereby serious NGOs were helped. But their fragmentation had to be avoided to avoid duplication of work and make better use of human and financial resources, Dr Muscat said.
If the Apoġġ agency needed so much staff, then the country was really undergoing a crisis, he said. “Shouldn’t we first see what is wrong with Maltese families and children so that Appoġġ would not need to grow, before pumping more money into it to the point of explosion?”
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
ALBERT FENECH
Feb 26th 2008, 10:45
The AN is putting forward some good and positive suggestions regarding home care, particularly tax reduction or rebate in the case of a partner looking after the other sick partner at home rather than consigning them off to a state hospital to put the full burden on the state. My mother cared for my father (with Dementia and Alzheimer's) for over three years at home, at great sacrifice and very high cost of employing a 24-hour carer. Despite this enormous expense and despite his total helplessness, my father was still charged income tax on his pensions. I wrote to the PM as well as to his role of Finance Minister many times, suggesting such a rebate, but the pleas fell on deaf ears. This is going to grow and grow into an enormous problem (people are living longer) and will eventually cast a great burden on the state and the Maltese tax-payer. This is a very good and praise-worthy proposal by the AN. Well done.
Sandro Pace
Feb 26th 2008, 08:59
and........perhaps you can start cyber booing instead of inserting a valid argument stating where you disagree.
But probably you are not capable of that and resort to the monkeyesque instinct of booing.
Fortunately here one is allowed to finish an argument civically.
Corinne Vela
Feb 25th 2008, 19:20
"Something sensible from AN for once," I thought. Then I read beyond the second paragraph.