Kenneth Cassar of Animal Rights raises an interesting point about Bible interpretation in his letter (March 14). He implies that the Bible contradicts itself in that it sanctions incest, since the children of Adam and Eve intermarried, and, yet, the Scriptures condemn such relationships.

There is an explanation. In those early days of earth's history, when the first human family was given the responsibility to multiply and fill the earth (Genesis 1:28), and when mankind obviously was much more physically robust than it is now (Genesis 5:3ff), it is clear that marriages between those of close kin were normal and necessary. Abraham and Sarah were half-brother and sister (Genesis 20:12). Moreover, Isaac and Rebekah were second cousins (Genesis 22:20; 24:4), and Jacob was wed to the daughters of Laban, his mother's brother, hence, to his first cousins (Genesis 27:43).

The Mosaic law forbidding family marriages, hence incest, came centuries later, emphasis on "centuries". Many scholars believe that the Mosaic law was enacted: (i) to separate Israel from the practices of the Egyptians and the Canaanites, who were notorious for their incestuous, immoral relationships; and (ii) as a physical and mental health measure for the progressively weakening human family.

There is also no doubt that the Scriptures are historically accurate. Nelson Glueck, the brilliant modern authority on the archaeology of Israel, has said: "No archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often led to amazing discoveries".

A striking evidence of divine inspiration is found in the fact that many of the principles of modern science were recorded as facts of nature in the Bible long before scientists confirmed them experimentally.

That the Bible is true is found in the testimony of those who have believed it. Millions of people, past and present, have personally experienced that its promises are true, its counsel is sound, its commands and restrictions are wise, and its authentic message of salvation meets every need for both time and eternity.

I am happy to note that Mr Cassar finds the sacred Book also to his taste. If, in perusing it, he comes across the slightest reference that Christ's last supper was held "in Essene quarters", I would appreciate the information.