Consumer Claims Tribunal decisions not honoured

It is very important for consumers to know about traders who do not respect decisions taken by Consumer Claims Tribunal (CCT) arbiter, Dr Martin Fenech. These traders do not deserve our custom.

So, if you have referred a case to the CCT, a decision was made by the arbiter in your favour, and the trader refuses to honour it, write to me and send me a copy of the decision.

On my part I will add the cases to our current list of CCT decisions not honoured featured below:

Simone Calaio vs Mr Jones of Cecile Boutique
The decision was made on September 6, 2005. The CCT arbiter accepted Ms Calaio's claim and ordered Cecile Boutique to pay her Lm30.

I appeal to Mr Jones, owner of Cecile Boutique, to pay Ms Calaio her Lm30.

Josephine Attard vs Sandro Bianchi of Flexi Marketing Ltd
The decision was made on June 9, 2005. The CCT arbiter accepted Mrs Attard's claim and ordered Mr Bianchi to pay her Lm400, and Lm50 as moral damages plus expenses against Flexi Marketing Ltd.

I appeal to Mr Bianchi of Flexi Marketing Ltd to honour the CCT arbiter's decision.

Mary A. Smith vs C. Gauci - Waterproofing
The decision was made on January 11, 2005. The CCT arbiter accepted Ms Smith's claim and ordered C. Gauci - WaterProofing to pay her Lm800 plus expenses. In line with our policy, we will continue asking C. Gauci - Waterproofing to honour the CCT decision.

Emanuela and Saviour Brincat vs Radamatic Ltd
The decision was made on August 31. The CCT arbiter partially accepted Emanuela and Saviour Brincat's claim and ordered Radamatic Ltd to pay them Lm500 plus expenses.