WSC 'goodwill'

I quote from The Times of November 9: "The Water Services Corporation cannot be held responsible for the quality of rainwater flowing into Mr Mintoff's well... As a sign of goodwill, the document stated, the WSC had cleaned Mr Mintoff's wells and...

I quote from The Times of November 9: "The Water Services Corporation cannot be held responsible for the quality of rainwater flowing into Mr Mintoff's well... As a sign of goodwill, the document stated, the WSC had cleaned Mr Mintoff's wells and repaired the water catchment system at The Olives. The WSC also cleaned the sewage system clearing obstacles which, it claims, had been caused by the roots of Mr Mintoff's own trees".

Two very simple questions: Does the WSC show the same sign of goodwill with all other citizens or only with Mr Mintoff? Who paid for this "sign of goodwill"? The WSC chairman or the taxpayer?

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.