Advert

USA Cycling sees violations in testing process

USA Cycling's chief operating officer Steve Johnson has lashed out at the recent doping allegations made against seven-times Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong.

French newspaper L'Equipe alleged last week that Armstrong's urine samples contained the banned blood-boosting substance EPO in 1999, the first year he won the world's greatest cycle race.

American Armstrong has denied ever taking performance-enhancing drugs during his career and has never failed a dope test.

"This isn't a 'doping positive'," Johnson told Reuters by telephone from USA Cycling's headquarters in Colorado Springs.

"This is just a publication in a French tabloid newspaper. That's our perspective.

"To me, this is an issue for the French people.

"They seemed very concerned about it and frankly I don't care what they think. And I don't think Lance does either."

There were no tests in 1999 to detect EPO, a drug that increases the level of red blood cells and endurance.

However, samples from the 1999 Tour were kept and have been recently re-tested by an anti-doping laboratory in Chatenay-Malabry outside Paris.

"WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) and the US Anti-Doping Agency, they've all defined a process for collecting samples, managing samples, testing the samples, identifying the people who are involved," said Johnson.

"They have certain rights in the process. None of that has been followed in this case."

Normal procedures

Officials from cycling's ruling body, WADA, the French sports ministry and the Tour de France all agree normal anti-doping proceedings had not been followed.

Chatenay-Malabry laboratory officials concede the tests were carried out for only scientific purposes and had no legal value because only one sample was tested.

"This whole thing isn't a big deal for Americans," said Johnson.

"What Lance has accomplished is so much bigger than just the Tour de France. That's only part of it."

Advert

0 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Advert
Advert