A childless couple have made an unica charta will whereby they nominated and instituted each other as universal heirs of their entire estate.

Would the surviving spouse be entitled to the full ownership of the inheritance, and upon the death of one of the spouses, can the remaining spouse make another will?

With regard to the first question, if the surviving spouse is nominated as universal heir, then he or she would be entitled to the full ownership of the estate.

An unica charta will is jointly and reciprocally made by the husband and the wife in one and the same instrument. This will may be unilaterally revoked by either of the spouses and according to section 592 (2) of the Civil Code, where such will is revoked by one of the testators with regard to his or her estate, it shall continue to be valid with regard to the estate of the other.

On the other hand, section 593 (1) provides that where, by a will unica charta, the testators shall have bequeathed to each other the ownership or the usufruct of all their property, or of the greater part thereof, the survivor who shall revoke the will with regard to his or her estate, shall, unless the pre-deceased shall have otherwise ordained, forfeit all the rights which he or she may have in virtue of such will on the estate of the predeceased spouse.

The same rule shall apply in any case in which, although the surviving spouse has not revoked the will, yet such will, by his or her own act, cannot be effectual with regard to his or her estate.

The judicial effects of revocation concerning the unica charta will vis-à-vis the surviving spouse vary, depending primarily, on the content thereof, that is to say that they may bring about forfeiture or not, depending on the type of property mutually bequeathed by the spouses and the terms stipulated in the will, which may contain (as mentioned above) a waiver of forfeiture by the predeceased spouse together with the surviving spouse.

Revocation of the type mentioned under section 592 (2) does not affect the validity of the estate of the predeceased spouse with regard to the surviving spouse, while revocation under section 593 (1), ruling out the possible waiver, is tantamount to forfeiture and hence the nullity with regard to the surviving spouse.

However, though nullity is effected under any of the above-mentioned sections with regard to the estate of the predeceased spouse, vis-à-vis the surviving spouse, validity will continue or subsist with regard to interested third parties.

In fact, section 594 of the Civil Code provides that in any of the cases mentioned above, the fruits from the pre-deceased spouse's demise on his or her estate are to vest wholly in his or her instituted heirs-at-law, as the case may be, without any prejudice to any bequest to any person other than the surviving spouse.

Therefore, the effects of forfeiture may bring about the cessation of the surviving spouse's rights over both the estate and the fruits received thereon of the predeceased spouse if no waiver is made in the unica charta will.

Finally, reader should note that the effects of forfeiture cannot be brought into being by third parties other than those specifically mentioned by law, namely testamentary heirs or heirs-at-law.

Send your legal problems, of general public interest, together with your name and address, to: The Lawyer, c/o The Sunday Times, PO Box 328, Valletta CMR 01 (fax: 2124-0806, e-mail: sunday@timesofmalta.com).

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.